Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 521 of 886.
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
I’m betting Trump thinks “Orwell” is a the name of a popular reality show. Any takers? — PolitiTweet.org
Robert Shrum @BobShrum
George Orwell 1984: “Black is white.” Thirty five years on, it’s happening. https://t.co/Sh29GflJsz
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Now Trump is reduced to attacking @JoeBiden for moving with his family from Pennsylvania to Delaware when Joe was eleven (11) years old! His desperation is showing. https://t.co/79FWDi7MOd — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
That’s what the media reports say, for sure. My question is when views like these will go public — with or without @SpeakerPelosi’s formal blessing. The Constitution needs to be unbound and unleashed, not kept under wraps. — PolitiTweet.org
Sandy Gottstein @SaveRDemocrazy
@tribelaw @justinamash @RepJerryNadler @jamie_raskin @RepAdamSchiff @tedlieu @SpeakerPelosi @rosadelauro… https://t.co/AAUFrvwRNx
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Exactly. But the law has a way of trumping the Trumps of the world. Watch this space. — PolitiTweet.org
Joyce Alene @JoyceWhiteVance
@tribelaw Same rationale says lawyer client privilege doesn’t apply if a lawyer is committing or covering up a clie… https://t.co/KFMHimsLCc
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
When will some Democrats in the House leadership show as much courage and good sense as Tea Party Republican @justinamash has now shown? @RepJerryNadler @jamie_raskin @RepAdamSchiff @tedlieu @SpeakerPelosi @rosadelauro @StenyHoyer @WhipClyburn — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
No wonder Trump long ago drew a red line at his financial crimes. It looks like they’re about to be exposed in all their gory detail — and odds are they’ll be entangled with this corrupt, money-driven, crime-laundering presidency https://t.co/UaEbqq63tj — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Notably, Jay Sekulow’s lawyers’ statement tonight did not actually deny the truth of Cohen’s testimony to the House Intelligence Committee. The statement just bad-mouthed Cohen yet again. — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
One step closer to an ironclad case for presidential subornation of perjury — this time, through his unprincipled l… https://t.co/gqJcOSUyPV
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
RT @tribelaw: "It is ... not fathomable that a Constitution that grants Congress the power to remove a President for reasons including crim… — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Please note, @Lawrence ⬇️ — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
The serious felonies Trump seems to be orchestrating against McGahn and his firm are codified in 18 U.S. Code § 151… https://t.co/M735TMsfIW
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Please note, @Lawrence ❤️ — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
The serious felonies Trump seems to be orchestrating against McGahn and his firm are codified in 18 U.S. Code § 151… https://t.co/M735TMsfIW
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
RT @tribelaw: The serious felonies Trump seems to be orchestrating against McGahn and his firm are codified in 18 U.S. Code § 1513, which c… — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
"It is ... not fathomable that a Constitution that grants Congress the power to remove a President for reasons including criminal behavior would deny [it] the power to investigate him for unlawful conduct— even without formally opening an impeachment inquiry," Judge Mehta wrote. — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
The serious felonies Trump seems to be orchestrating against McGahn and his firm are codified in 18 U.S. Code § 1513, which criminalizes retaliating against a prospective witness in a lawful investigation — like that being undertaken by the House Judiciary Committee — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
For sure! — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
@ThePlumLineGS https://t.co/9PYtnotZYC — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Trump’s effort to exact that price itself constitutes a federal felony and would be yet another impeachable offense… https://t.co/RtDtApZ6i5
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Trump’s effort to exact that price itself constitutes a federal felony and would be yet another impeachable offense https://t.co/aQGR1NGRPh — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
.@SpeakerPelosi is a master politician but needs to recognize that it’s finally time to begin an #ImpeachmentInquiryNow into WHETHER OR NOT Trump has committed impeachable offenses. Both principle and politics demand nothing less. https://t.co/DcgyFHAIk9 — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
.@RepJayapal & Rep @davidcicilline now agree @HouseJudiciary should begin formal #ImpeachmentHearings into whether Trump has committed impeachable offenses if McGahn obeys Trump’s order to defy the Committee’s subpoena to testify on May 21. @RepJerryNadler @jamie_raskin @tedlieu — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
One step closer to an ironclad case for presidential subornation of perjury — this time, through his unprincipled legal mouthpiece Jay Sekulow. The march toward impeachment accelerates. https://t.co/rsg3R0ZWpv — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Don McGahn clearly cannot invoke Trump’s illegal gag order as a defense to being held in contempt for defying a duly issued subpoena to testify in @HouseJudiciary about potentially impeachment offenses by President Trump. — PolitiTweet.org
(((Rep. Nadler))) @RepJerryNadler
Read my statement on the White House blocking Don McGahn from testifying tomorrow to @HouseJudiciary on evidence of… https://t.co/fHpg0xQEi7
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
This 5/20/19 ruling against Trump should be affirmed quickly on appeal. It’s legally ironclad. https://t.co/Gx0t5xyseX — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
If Trump dares to order defiance of this judicial decision, that will be the constitutional crisis that only impeachment can resolve. https://t.co/oYqtj2zhXY — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
A superb thread. If you care about our country and its survival as a constitutional republic, read and retweet this series of @justinamash truths. Strong and right beats weak and wrong — as @jheil just said on @NicolleDWallace. Begin #ImpeachmentHearingsNow. That means NOW!!!!! — PolitiTweet.org
Justin Amash @justinamash
People who say there were no underlying crimes and therefore the president could not have intended to illegally obs… https://t.co/sHNffTd6cI
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
This https://t.co/z0DoDRSgYJ — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
This WH position can’t POSSIBLY be the law when the House is exercising its power to investigate whether the president has committed impeachable offenses. The OLC/Cipollone view would rip the Impeachment Power root and branch out of the Constitution. https://t.co/2x1Vk1V4AU — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Trump’s obsession with keeping Flynn’s dealings with Russia (and his own knowledge of them) in the dark suggests the president was (and is) being pressured by Putin to clear the path for something that would be understood to betray the United States https://t.co/GUXGk2ZsQn — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
.@RepJerryNadler, @RepAdamSchiff & @jamie_raskin can be counted on to investigate this charge. Impeachable offenses begin with Treason and, relevant here, Bribery by POTUS. @jorie_graham @AriMelber @Lawrence @chrislhayes — PolitiTweet.org
Jorie graham @jorie_graham
@tribelaw @FareedZakaria @JulianGewirtz This is huge. Kennedy seat was given up over fraud in xchange w/Trump. If t… https://t.co/aqnyd9TNfY
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
.@PeteButtigieg: "[W]e need to make sure that we're changing the channel from this show that he's created. Because what matters — and I get it. Look, it's mesmerizing. It's hard for anybody to look away. Me too. It is the nature of grotesque things that you can't look away." WOW. — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Trump’s corrupt uses and self-protective dangling of pardons aren’t just abnormal. They’re perversions and abuses of presidential authority. They may well belong among the potential Articles of Impeachment. https://t.co/LwEIc4e77z — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
If you’re strongly pro-choice, which would you prefer: 1. For SCOTUS to duck all direct invitations to overrule Roe v. Wade altogether but nibble it to death gradually (the current path) or 2. For SCOTUS to energize Dems by smashing Roe outright? https://t.co/QzRXwml9IH — PolitiTweet.org