Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 515 of 886.
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
RT @ThePlumLineGS: @tribelaw The roadmap offered by @tribelaw avoids this problem, while keeping alive the possibility that if opinion shif… — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
“Whether one tends right or left, Warren’s importance to the political dialogue transcends the eventual fate of her campaign.” — @RicPatterson. Read his brilliant piece in @BulwarkOnline here: https://t.co/tB67A7qNbr — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
RT @theblatt: .@tribelaw floats an intriguing option: After impeachment inquiry, if Senate is lost cause, House could opt to enumerate hig… — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Excellent thread by @ThePlumLineGS building on my @PostOpinions piece this morning — PolitiTweet.org
Greg Sargent @ThePlumLineGS
This is a great piece by @tribelaw outlining how House Democrats can pursue an impeachment inquiry, without it nece… https://t.co/4PUDDqg1nG
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
75 years ago today: D-Day. We owe them everything. My prayer: Let us not betray all they fought for. — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
You bet — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Here’s my modest proposal for #ImpeachmentInquiryNow: I want it to build a bridge on which the #ImpeachTrumpNow advocates and the #NoImpeachment crowd can meet — and move forward together to protect constitutional democracy. In the June 6 @washingtonpost https://t.co/g3fs0UZ6bB — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
This is a helpful start, but the House shouldn’t draft Articles of Impeachment before doing an #ImpeachmentInquiryNow. Putting the cart before the horse is as bad as delaying the vital process of mounting that horse. That’s what the House has to do — now https://t.co/e534trurX4 — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Proud to see my 1990 book “Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes” invoked and quoted so insightfully in @NewYorker by my remarkable colleague, Professor @JeannieSuk Gersen. Thank you, Jeannie! https://t.co/I1LW0256Ur — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
RT @PDSoros: @Harvard_Law Professor and 2001 #PDSoros Fellow @JeannieSuk discusses the intersecting histories of eugenics and abortion, and… — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
People rightly worry about our deeply divided country, but the remedy isn’t to bury the chaos that surrounds Trump’s crimes and the coverup. It’s for Congress to expose the truth and educate the nation: #ImpeachmentInquiryNow Anything less just deepens the chaos and thus division — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
75 years ago today. D-Day. Speechless. — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Did the dude get in front of HRH again? He had just one job there — and he screwed upeven that one. — PolitiTweet.org
Farid Zakaria @farid_zakaria
@_youhadonejob1 @newsplatter Yes she can. https://t.co/a5vaxPKXU1
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
I’m not making Trump predictions but describing settled law. @AlanDersh misreads the justices who didn’t fully agree with the majority in Nixon v US (1993), ignores the 6-justice majority, and misreads Bush v Gore, disregards the Constitution’s text, structure, and history. Bad. — PolitiTweet.org
Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh
Compare my predictions against @tribelaw when it comes to Trump and see who’s been proved right more often. End/
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
.@RepKarenBass just said to @AliVelshi that impeachment by the House does nothing unless the Senate tries and convicts POTUS. She is wrong. Impeachment doesn’t REMOVE Trump unless the Senate convicts but it can do a lot even if the Senate is in Trump’s pocket. Watch this space! — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Self-contradiction is a problem only for those who adhere to Aristotelian logic. If X & ~X are both accepted, then everything is true. And false. Barr & Trump don’t roll that way, @neal_katyal. Hadn’t you heard? — PolitiTweet.org
TheBeat w/Ari Melber @TheBeatWithAri
"That is just a flat contradiction. Barr three months ago, to get his job, saying one thing and now saying somethin… https://t.co/6c1TzcWtCV
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
The @AlanDersh theory that the Chief Justice (or SCOTUS as a whole) could intervene to stop an impeachment on constitutional grounds is idiotic. Advising Trump he could be rescued that way wd be legal malpractice. Too bad pundit malpractice isn’t a thing. https://t.co/Y7OsIgF7Gi — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Courts are more likely to enforce subpoenas like these once the hearings become part of an impeachment inquiry than they are as long as the House refuses to bite that bullet. As matters stand, it’s too easy to depict it as stonewalling v. footdragging. https://t.co/tI9I0eiZCa — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
You MUST read this. It’s what the abortion debate is really about. If only all judges were like the great @ngertner . . . https://t.co/EPsJmZ0nev — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
The ground is shifting hourly. Resisting a formal House impeachment inquiry is becoming increasingly untenable politically as well as legally. Letting fear of @senatemajldr and his Senate cronies drive what the House does gets less defensible by the day. https://t.co/qeqoJ8p1R8 — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Question to @JoyceWhiteVance: Do you trust AG Barr to let DOJ prosecutors deal with Nader as they should to get information that might incriminate Trump? — PolitiTweet.org
Joyce Alene @JoyceWhiteVance
A second child pornography conviction would come with exposure to a long sentence. Nader should be highly motivated… https://t.co/lGChV29XB7
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
This dismissal by Judge McFadden on standing grounds could’ve come from an Obama appointee. That almost nobody will believe that is a testament to the sick way Trump & McConnell have collaborated to remake the judiciary in the Federalist Society’s image. https://t.co/F8YrKVk9sR — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
I beg to differ. There was a vast amount we didn’t know and many crimes (like at least a dozen obstructions of justice) that he hadn’t yet committed. Being known as a corrupt jerk on Election Day can’t become a defense to impeachment a couple years later https://t.co/0n6Qf46beA — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
It’s a clue we need to study but one we need to put into context. There was no Fox TV, FB, Twitter, etc., those days — and the relevant timelines aren’t quite aligned. https://t.co/pNonnKwOS3 — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
The faster the better — PolitiTweet.org
Elie Honig @eliehonig
Another Court (this time a federal court of appeals) expedites a case involving a subpoena battle between Congress… https://t.co/wHfjfgDy23
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Better than no hearings at all on Trump’s crimes, but that’s pretty faint praise. https://t.co/NrhqhDlgRN — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
Here’s the conversation @RepRaskin, @harrylitman, Erwin Chemerinsky, and I had a couple days ago about #HighCrimesAndMisdemeanors https://t.co/tLtlHjBtAU — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
RT @talkingfedspod: The most important episode we've done to date hits tomorrow morning: a really great discussion on "High Crimes and Misd… — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
The Nixon history refutes any idea that the constitutional functions of impeachment and trial are as neatly separated between the House and Senate as the roles of grand jury charge by indictment and petit jury trial to verdict and sentencing would suggest. Just ask @JohnWDean! — PolitiTweet.org
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
In today’s environment. IMPEACHMENT would inevitably mean more than simply charging the president with high crimes and misdemeanors. It would necessarily represent a decision that POTUS had committed severe offenses against the nation. My proposal simply recognizes that reality. — PolitiTweet.org
