Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 424 of 675.
Burgess Everett @burgessev
@AndrewZelman It is harder than usual to find senators in this environment with press restrictions — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
I did ask Sen. Portman how he will vote tomorrow on witnesses "We'll see" — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
Just to be totally clear, Romney will vote for witness question tomorrow — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
So unless Murkowski is a yes and Roberts break a tie, an exceedingly unlikely scenario, the witness vote fails — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
Lamar: “there is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven and that does not meet the United States Constitution’s high bar for an impeachable offense.” — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
Collins: “I believe hearing from certain witnesses would give each side the opportunity to more fully and fairly make their case, resolve any ambiguities, and provide additional clarity. Therefore, I will vote in support of the motion to allow witnesses and documents” — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
Sen. Moran: “having heard from both sides, the arguments demonstrate that additional evidence or witnesses would not change the material underlying facts that describe the president’s actions.” — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
Loeffler asks the WH counsel about the Biden memo story we just published. — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
I am listening to the Terps game in one ear, so went back and grabbed full list on that question: Alexander, Cruz, Portman, Toomey, Sullivan, Murkowski, Graham — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
Alexander joins a question about whether if Bolton's recollection is true it still wouldn't be impeachable and then his testimony "wouldn't add anything to this case" (!) — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
I am told Senate Republicans are going to try to ask a question about this Biden memo on the floor, drafted by Sen.… https://t.co/BPzmHs5jQZ — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
New w @BresPolitico: As senator in 1999, Joe Biden wrote four-page memo arguing against need for Senate to bring in… https://t.co/gIiM897Hm4
Burgess Everett @burgessev
Minor freakout developing in Republican circles about where Sens. Alexander and Murkowski are going to land. An actual cliffhanger! https://t.co/SE6upUJnNI @marianne_levine — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
@BresPolitico In a number of previous impeachment trials, the Senate has reached the judgment that its constitution… https://t.co/ZU3BQvUFTP — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
@BresPolitico Biden cited historical precedents from impeachment cases going back to the establishment of the Senat… https://t.co/20DzMcAHbJ — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
New w @BresPolitico: As senator in 1999, Joe Biden wrote four-page memo arguing against need for Senate to bring in witnesses in impeachment trial “The Senate may dismiss articles of impeachment without holding a full trial or taking new evidence." https://t.co/Y91czgA7pB — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
@kelsey_snell @mkraju @marianne_levine Nah one compliment for my sworn enemy is nearly too many — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
@mkraju @marianne_levine My first tweet had a typo -- I was going to gripe about how @mkraju keeps finding Lamar — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
Sens. Lamar Alexander and Lisa Murkowski met privately tonight and are still deliberating on witnesses, per person familiar with Senate GOP dynamics. As first reported by @mkraju, Alexander will announce his decision tonight https://t.co/SE6upUJnNI @marianne_levine — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
Sens. Lamar Alexander and Lisa Murkowski met privately tonight and are still deliberating on witnesses, per person familiar with Senate GOP dynamics. As first reported by @mkraju who keeps finding, Alexander will announce his decision tonight https://t.co/SE6upUJnNI — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
Lamar, among others, asks House managers to describe the difference between bipartisanship in the Nixon inquiry vs. now. This strikes me as a hint of where he might land on witnesses. — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
Warren asks if not having witnesses and evidence could legitimize confidence in Justice Roberts, he reads question. Schiff says he wouldn't say that and Roberts has presided "admirably" — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
@igorbobic you look different in your new photo — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
Cassidy asks question, requests that Lofgren respond ... and he gets Lofgren! — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
@marianne_levine @BresPolitico So what can Democrats do? They can offer motions tomorrow after IF the witness vote fails. That could drive things late into the night and into Saturday. McConnell could power through, or his members may want time to deliberate. These questions are still up in the air — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
@marianne_levine @BresPolitico “I’m 100 percent sure of how I’m going to vote. You’ll see soon and you won’t be surprised,” said Toomey, who said hearing new witness testimony would not be likely to change his mind about acquitting the president. — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
@marianne_levine @BresPolitico Thune: “There are a lot of our members … who, if we can prevail on witnesses, want to just move to the final question as quickly as possible and conclude this.” Barrasso: now just a “matter of what delaying tactics the Democrats could us" — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
Republicans grow confident they can defeat witness vote and quickly end Trump trial “hope would be that if we do win tomorrow, that we will quickly close it out,” Majority Whip Thune says in interview @marianne_levine @BresPolitico https://t.co/SE6upUJnNI — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
Save Sen. Collins, at-risk incumbent GOP senators leading the charge against hearing new witnesses despite Democrat's efforts to make sure their stance lingers into November, per @marianne_levine https://t.co/F6miIMBq34 — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
“It’s very important whether or not a group of Democratic activists, part of the Obama-Biden administration were working together for years looking for an opportunity to impeach the president,” Paul explained. He blamed “selective belief in protecting the whistleblower statute" — PolitiTweet.org
Burgess Everett @burgessev
More from a contentious news conference with Rand afterward: "My question is about two people … who have been over… https://t.co/wKrJ0SyTBi — PolitiTweet.org
Kyle Cheney @kyledcheney
NEW: Chief Justice Roberts refused to read a question from Rand Paul that would have named the alleged whistleblowe… https://t.co/NzMQrkSuQ6
