Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 282 of 496.
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
RT @EasySimon: @Veritatem2021 Only if you want to include NATO's expansion in to the debate That is not why the conflict is concentrated i… — PolitiTweet.org
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
RT @ClarkeMicah: 1/2 .@alfred_wickham, how does it feel to take part in a McCarthyite smear campaign? As my late brother believed in non-ex… — PolitiTweet.org
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
RT @ClarkeMicah: 2/3 .@alfred_wickham Interestingly, the Iraq war fanatics tried the same techniques against the war's opponents.We were 'd… — PolitiTweet.org
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
RT @Iromg: Peter joins me @TalkTV tomorrow. Literally anything could happen — PolitiTweet.org
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
And all because I caught .@popovaprof in a factual error about the Kiev coup she says didn’t happen . That was when she started to dislike details, I think.. — PolitiTweet.org
K S @guyinspace
@ClarkeMicah @PopovaProf Shameless lying from Popova.
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
Here is the grotesque and totalitarian propaganda flyer tweeted by @alfred_wickham, with its 1984 message that doubt about the war is treachery and the product of Kremlin propaganda. We are on the road to imposed thought, if people do not identify and resist this slime. — PolitiTweet.org
Alfred Wickham @alfred_wickham
@ClarkeMicah Mr Hitchens, does it feel good to sell out to a fascist aggressor? I don’t think it’s very British. D… https://t.co/1GnH9h8p0E
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
2/2 Key quote :'The goal of Russian propaganda is not to render you 'pro-Putin' but to make you doubt sufficiently not to take an openly pro-Ukrainian stance',. So it embodies the appalling idea that doubt is a thought-crime, which places you in the enemy camp. — PolitiTweet.org
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
1/2 Fascinating propaganda tweeted by .@Alfred_wickham. Needs deep analysis but one key message is that doubt itself about the war is a pro-enemy action. Neutrality or silence are blameworthy. As in 1984, the citizen must shout for victory,or be considered disloyal. Sinister. — PolitiTweet.org
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
@when_cats_away It is soft totalitarianism, cutesy and Norman Rockwellish, but with a simple McCarthyite message - dissent is treachery and independent minds are working for the foe. After the fear propaganda for Covid panic worked so well, this will probably work too. — PolitiTweet.org
Hunca-Munca @when_cats_away
@ClarkeMicah @alfred_wickham Wow. That these people actually make a poster invoking a cutesy WWII feel to try to su… https://t.co/Cjbti1X4Bi
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
3/3 .@alfred_wickham. Every dubious government pursuing dubious policies seeks to portray dissent as treachery and to claim that sceptics are working for a wicked enemy. Vladimir Putin uses this exact technique in Russia, and you are using it here. Shame on you. — PolitiTweet.org
Alfred Wickham @alfred_wickham
@ClarkeMicah Mr Hitchens, does it feel good to sell out to a fascist aggressor? I don’t think it’s very British. D… https://t.co/1GnH9h8p0E
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
2/3 .@alfred_wickham Interestingly, the Iraq war fanatics tried the same techniques against the war's opponents.We were 'defending a fascist dictator' if we opposed an illegal invasion.But in those days there were fewer gullible and ignorant people,and Twitter was in its infancy — PolitiTweet.org
Alfred Wickham @alfred_wickham
@ClarkeMicah Mr Hitchens, does it feel good to sell out to a fascist aggressor? I don’t think it’s very British. D… https://t.co/1GnH9h8p0E
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
1/2 .@alfred_wickham, how does it feel to take part in a McCarthyite smear campaign? As my late brother believed in non-existent WMD, and fervently and unswervingly supported the stupidest and most disastrous war in modern history, I wouldn't seek his approval. — PolitiTweet.org
Alfred Wickham @alfred_wickham
@ClarkeMicah Mr Hitchens, does it feel good to sell out to a fascist aggressor? I don’t think it’s very British. D… https://t.co/1GnH9h8p0E
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
RT @Jonathangosky: Wow! @ClarkeMicah — PolitiTweet.org
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
.@vasilina_orlova, please ask Ambassador Matlock, who I\m quoting, who used the phrase 'illegal coup'. I would not have bothered with the 'illegal', but I prefer to quote accurately. It's a bit of a quibble, isn't it? The point is that such a distinguished person says it. — PolitiTweet.org
Dr. Vasilina Orlova (Василина Орлова) @vasilina_orlova
@ClarkeMicah What do you mean by "illegal putsch"? If that was a putsch, according to you, then the illegal is ridiculously redundant.
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
This is simply false, @popovaprof. But you know that. — PolitiTweet.org
Maria Popova @PopovaProf
@JosephHay92 @ClarkeMicah Yes, he's not for peace. He thinks Russia owns Ukraine. I can't respect an imperialist co… https://t.co/Z0FaZgv21f
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
.@diykitatony. If I were you, I would call you a Holocaust apologist for that stupid remark. As I am not you, I will merely say that it was a crude, indefensible and rather stupid thing to say. — PolitiTweet.org
Armands @DIYKitAtony
@MBSepulveda @JPHughes19 @ClarkeMicah Why stop at events of 80 years past? Why not got to the time when the first H… https://t.co/34XwxaMPP7
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
@nickofnotrades. Of course there was Russian involvement, and EU involvement. But the key event, which in my view set Europe in course for war even more than NATO’s 2008 summit, was brought about by the USA. — PolitiTweet.org
nickofnotrades @nickofnotrades
@neil_abrams @ClarkeMicah Funny how the All-Powerful American Involvement(tm) is always the deciding factor, no mat… https://t.co/LteDyaSCC8
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
RT @pastakudde: @DavidSacks Reminds me of the “the EU is a continuation of Germany by other means” talk by Peter Hitchens — PolitiTweet.org
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
See the Peter Hitchens blog .@phykell. — PolitiTweet.org
Darrin Addams @phykell
@ClarkeMicah Hopefully, they provided you with tea and biscuits though (I couldn’t read the article to check).
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
Thoughts on blood donation, in today’s Mail on Sunday. https://t.co/mcyqUO8A8w — PolitiTweet.org
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
Frommy article on blood donation in today’s Mail on Sunday. https://t.co/5vlo0EvsrD — PolitiTweet.org
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
From my Mail on Sunday column https://t.co/7O3zoyvFI1 — PolitiTweet.org
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
From my Mail on Sunday column today https://t.co/wNe8lgoiWh — PolitiTweet.org
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
Did I mention funding, @jimmy2times19? The most basic knowledge of Ukraine will allow you to realise that the 'Ukrainian people' were and remain deeply divided. I absolutely think the Russians were equally up to no good, and if they had succeeded in a putsch, I would say so. — PolitiTweet.org
James Coughlin @Jimmy2times19
@ClarkeMicah It doesn't matter if the Americans funded it. The Ukrainian people did it and they didn't overthrow th… https://t.co/BKoQOP2Igp
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
Of *course* it does @ulvernielsen. Because the question of who actually wanted the war arises. I was disgusted and furious when I heard of the invasion. I am not wholly sure that everyone in the West felt the same way. — PolitiTweet.org
ulver Nielsen @UlverNielsen
@ClarkeMicah @Jimmy2times19 France did declare war on Prussia. The fact that Bismarck suckered them into it doesn’t… https://t.co/uuTcxosJtS
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
@jsherredadams. No, the Russian invasion is because Russia invaded, and Putin is to blame for this stupid, indefensible action. But it is absurd to pretend that there was no provocation, see Robert Kagan in Foreign Affairs. — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Adams @JSherredAdams
@Jimmy2times19 @ClarkeMicah The Russian invasion is because the US provoked it.
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
A fascinating point. This should have occurred to me . It is indeed interesting .@mfaithfull and I shall now look into it. — PolitiTweet.org
Matthew Faithfull @mfaithfull
@ClarkeMicah @alexnazaryan Interesting to note that there is no such distinction in Russian.
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
And yet, @jimmy2times19, the Russian invasion came eight long years after the putsch, and the huge events (largely ignored by those now obsessed with the subject) which followed it and were in my view caused by it. — PolitiTweet.org
James Coughlin @Jimmy2times19
@JSherredAdams @ClarkeMicah No the Russian invasion is the reason why. Don’t take bullshit
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
3/3 .@Jimmy2times19 I care, because unless we learn the true history of events, we cannot make sense of them, or of anything else in the world. And the less informed we are about actions and their results, the less free we are to act and do good. — PolitiTweet.org
James Coughlin @Jimmy2times19
@ClarkeMicah Who cares for godssake? Stop making it the moral equivalence of the Russian invasion.
Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah
2/3 @Jimmy2times19 ... both lead to death, misery, destruction, displacement etc. Both are morally wrong. My point is that provocation shouldn't be ignored. If it s, then people believe absurd things, such as that France started the 1870 war. — PolitiTweet.org
James Coughlin @Jimmy2times19
@ClarkeMicah Who cares for godssake? Stop making it the moral equivalence of the Russian invasion.