Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 81 of 902.
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
How did this happen? In some ways, it's a story about the radicalization of the normies. But there are also connections between "Alt-Lite" and right-wing figures and Russian assets that should be more critically examined... — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
What's important is that 8 years ago, it was people like me saying these things, and I was much less well known at the time. Now, these pro-Russian talking points have matriculated to figures that are communicating to mainstream Republicans, Candace Owens being the best example. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
FWIW, the notion that "Ukraine is fake" is increasingly unrealistic. After a brutal invasion, Ukrainians have probably become the most nationalist people on the planet! — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
These were my talking points, too, in 2014, when there was something of an anti-war Left and Right consensus against Maidan. When I reiterated them, I recognized them as talking-points. I reject them now, of course. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
A lot of mainstream commentators have reacted to this saying, "She's ignorant." Candace Owens is not ignorant; she's been given pro-Russian talking-points, and any effective talking-point has at least some basis in reality. — PolitiTweet.org
Candace Owens @RealCandaceO
“Ukraine wasn’t a thing until 1989!” https://t.co/CpmfX90wCB
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
“For a world without Nazis” I always thought Dugin’s conflation of neo-liberalism with fascism was mere rhetorical hyperbole. In fact, the meme has become the primary slogan of the Russian war effort. https://t.co/PlWRCtMElG — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
@bawitdabrah I’ll do a Space on Depeche Mode. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @Heghoulian: Putin is the ultimate postmodernist. He’ll script a positively medieval narrative if it serves his purposes, while (presuma… — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
@Poensgen_JK @EventmanagerVie “Unbelehrbar” ist die beste Beschreubung der Rechte. Man muss weitergehen. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
@bawitdabrah Haven’t I answered this already? Black Celebration. Violator, close second. 101 is one of the greatest concert albums ever. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
The most important Space I’ve done thus far. https://t.co/aBXontFfiD — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @AlanRMacLeod: “It’s one thing for sarin gas to be used on people in far away Syria who are Muslim and of a different culture. What is E… — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @juliaioffe: Channel One, the Kremlin's flagship TV channel, is discussing "the Nazification of America" and how Nancy Pelosi sieg heils. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
Join me in my Space! https://t.co/aBXontFfiD — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
@Poensgen_JK Yes — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
Set a reminder for my upcoming Space! https://t.co/aBXontFfiD — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @Wormsley: A dimwit's favorite pastime is playing gotcha games, digging up who said what when as "proof" that the person's current views… — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @Wilson__Valdez: He flew all the way to Poland to do....this. https://t.co/kV9UplVpF9 — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @SplendorEternal: This article is an absolute delight to read. If you believe in Pan-Westernism at all, or in “Fortress Europa,” you sh… — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @SplendorEternal: I am so proud to be a part of the broader American conservative movement - a movement dedicated to Eternal Values such… — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @thewiretwo: @RichardBSpencer The most annoying category of natsec and career military folks are those who argue for endless military in… — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @thiccgenius: The Chicago bears accidentally making an inflammatory, sectarian statement about Irish politics is maybe the funniest NFL… — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
@gadolic As I clearly stated, it should be done in the territory not yet controlled by Russia. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
At this point, three options are possible. 1) Russia wins over the next 3-6 months; 2) Ukraine becomes the site of a horrible, years-long insurgency; 3) Ukraine is divided and the bloodshed stops. Why choose options 1 or 2? Declare a #NoFlyZone! — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
Public opinion is so strongly behind the Ukrainian cause that simply abandoning it now is impossible. Additionally, supplying millions of rounds of ammunition simply delays the inevitable. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
West Ukraine could be established as a NATO protectorate and eventually brought into the European Union. East Ukraine is already in the Russian sphere; that is, it's already been lost. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
Public opinion went from "We need a no-fly zone now!" to "holy shit—let's not start WWIII." There's a lot of nuance in between those two positions. A #NoFlyZoneOverUkraine should be considered. I hope we establish it as soon as possible. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
Establishing a #NoFlyZoneOverUkraine—more precisely, over the territory not yet controlled by Russia—would transform the current conflict into a Cold War battle with established lines. Not ideal, but much better than the status quo. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
Currently, the Ukraine war amounts to a major power exerting its will over a small country—one with lots of friends and help but a small fighting force and no nuclear capacity. This could lead to a long-term, horrible insurgency. No one wants that—including Moscow. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
Putin is not an insane mad man bent on world destruction. He is a rational, though brutal, actor, who will use force, even nuclear force, if pressed. But he also understands the consequences of a nuclear exchange—which are dire for him. — PolitiTweet.org