Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 191 of 811.
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @RADIXJournal_: Myth, Symbol, & Religion: An Introduction to REM w/ @MarkBrahmin and @RichardBSpencer https://t.co/IiUbGaiJY8 — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @EuropeanPan: Condolences to the British people for making their own country weaker, reducing its global influence, shrinking its econom… — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
@IlanaMercer Well, I was born in 1978. But I did watch some Nureyev on YouTube. A very different style than what we see now. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
@MattRayLiberty @IlanaMercer Ed’s book builds on both, particularly Rushton’s. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
The Optics Question, Revisited https://t.co/chO6Ut2oqx — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @AOC: It looks like House GOP are going to try to block Trump’s request for $2k tomorrow. Some other items they’ve blocked: - Retroacti… — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
@Thamster2 and will do a casual livestream tonight at 7 PM ET / 4 PM PT. “The Optics Question, Revisited “ https://t.co/UI6jM9Q7iO — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
@Thamster2 and will do a casual livestream tonight at 7 PM ET / 4 PM PT. “The Optics Question, Revisited “ — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
https://t.co/VBRgf431Eo — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @mtracey: The COVID/omnibus bill contains $290 million for the "Countering Russian Influence Fund," which subsidizes "democracy programs… — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @RADIXJournal_: "The Arguments Against 'Race'" https://t.co/TRCWRgOv8P — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @heraclitean11: Literally five hours apart. 🤡🤡🤡 American conservatism is nothing more than a loose collection of stone cold r*tards run… — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
@XSenJ11 @VDAREJamesK @realDonaldTrump Nancy Pelosi has already come out in support of 2k per month. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
https://t.co/zD4cihm95b — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
@AlbusDunadan America cums first. Groypers, not at all. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
@KarlThorburn Even Baked Alaska was pretty funny in 2016. It was a culture of its time. It's not worth returning to. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
Yes, this might seem off-the-wall, but it was Trump's means of transcending polarization by combining his base with Democrats, who are actually interested in national policy. Instead, he embraced "conservatism," so-called "populism," and other platforms that have minority appeal. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
The means of transcending polarization was to dump the GOP, which only recently accepted him and never really loved him. Trump should've focused on major infrastructure initiatives (including "The Wall") and national healthcare. The obvious partners were the Democrats. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
Trump's fundamental failure in 2017—which resulted in a kind of "fools mate"—was his embrace of the GOP and Paul's Ryan's speakership. They enacted some of the most unpopular policies imaginable: incoherent healthcare reform, tax cuts, etc. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
@Apollo_Returns I think the term you’re reaching for is “Freudian slip.” — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
The modern, male equivalent of a chastity belt has been achieved. — PolitiTweet.org
Michael Anissimov @NRxPenguin
Check out my room, girl https://t.co/7axfVPOZWi
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
The politician or party who recognizes this reality is the one with a chance to transcend polarization. Trump has *always* understood this at a gut level. But he lacks the imagination or political will or ruthlessness to break through polarization, as opposed to leaning into it. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
People love this kind of "government" but hate "Washington"—that is, politicians and lobbyists who use the pandemic as cover to send billions to Israel and Ukraine and promote feminism in Pakistan, and whatever else is going in that 5,000-page bill. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
If government just created a $500 billion bill to send $2,000 to everyone over the age of 18, the whole country would be united at Christmas. It's that simple. (Rich people who don't need the cash could be guilt-tripped into donating it to charity or whatever.) — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
People love "government" when "government" means a simple, non-means-tested entitlement. Everyone loves social security and medicare. UBI is now popular, etc. On the other hand, many people hate complicated, unfair welfare programs, and most everyone is suspicious of foreign aid. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
Alright, this will be one of my least controversial, most "normie-friendly," "no-brainer" tweet storms of all time. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @heraclitean11: Personnel is policy. Let’s take a look at MAGA personnel, shall we? Mike Pompeo. John Bolton. Elliot Abrams. Art… — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @mtracey: "$2,000 checks if you vote for Trump" was apparently lost on the genius GOP operatives running the Trump re-election campaign — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @KoenigRiver: 👍 👍 👍 Where has this Trump been for the last four years? This is the guy I voted for in 2016. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer
RT @kaiirosmoment: https://t.co/whdiZHjNAi — PolitiTweet.org
