Richard Spencer

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

Tucker and The Great Replacement https://t.co/GC4I5c3OPg — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

One of the objects is to work out the kinks before Sunday. Ed and I will return—with special guest "Atheism is Unstoppable." 1 PM ET. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

I will take super-chats via Entropy, if you're so inclined. https://t.co/N0sVbJj9wD — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

I'm going to do a live-stream on Odysee and Twitter tonight, just me. I'll discuss the Tucker Carlson controversy and the Great Replacement. 9 PM ET / 6 PM PT https://t.co/2uwXW8wZnk — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

@russiancosmist @GuiDurocher @RichardCCarrier Do you think we just need *more* conservatism, *more intense* conservatism? Or do you think we should at least ask why conservatives across the world have lost and will continue to lose? — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

@russiancosmist @GuiDurocher @RichardCCarrier I find statements like curious. Currently, there is a multi-billion dollar industry called "conservatism," which appeals directly to middle America and its values. And yet they continue to be displaced? — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

🎯 — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

They are angry. And they are coming. https://t.co/Dk3NbogdE0 — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

@PatrickGanel555 @NickScan92 Alright, that’s fair. I might have misunderstood. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

@PatrickGanel555 @NickScan92 So I do have power! Good to hear that. In both 2016 and 2020, I was part of voting blocks that were victorious. So I, again, don't really understand your point. You become sillier and more deluded the more I talk to you. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

@HighCultHill The title makes it sound like New Atheism, which it is not. Perhaps it was a little bit of crypsis? — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

@PatrickGanel555 @NickScan92 I’ve always been curious about the point of posting this. You’re an anon on Twitter. You no power either. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

@GuiDurocher @RichardCCarrier I actually haven't read Carrier, but I've listened to him interviewed many times. Skribina is an academic and philosopher, but "The Jesus Hoax" highly readable. It's not the academic edifice it perhaps needs to be to have an impact. It's a starting point. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

*The Jesus Hoax* and *REM* are different books, but they seem to be signposts pointing out a new path for Western man—one in which we can achieve a destiny beyond the bounds of Jahweh and Christ. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

Mark Brahmin's upcoming book—REM—touches briefly on the "historical Jesus" question. But its main benefit is its discussion of the means by which Judaism and Christianity influence art and media and the overall psyche of Western man. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

It's true, on one level, that Christians have always misunderstood their own religion. But on another level, they have understood it all too well. How exactly does this process of crypsis and influence and mystery operate? — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

That said, Skribina doesn't fully explain the system behind Christianity: how did it have, and continue to have, such popularity, influence, and power? Just saying that it valorizes the weak and ugly and promotes equality isn't enough. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

I say Skribina's book is "incomplete" in this sense. He features plenty of quotations from the Old and New Testaments, revealing the utterly Jewish and overall heinous nature of these creeds. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

Paul thus invented the leveling, world-rejecting religion that would soon take humanity by storm. Uncovering the actual message of Jesus thus becomes a difficult task; we're dealing with scraps of evidence and one must, by necessity, use intuition and take interpretive leaps. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

Christianity was thus a conscious strategy on the part of Paul. In the wake of the absolute failure of the Jewish revolt on Rome—which led to the destruction of the Temple and crucifixion of the rebel known as Jesus of Nazareth—a "third way" had be found. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

Paul's Christianity marks a development from this basis: the meek shall inherit the earth—and their savior is a Jewish god-man. It's a universalist, leveling, anti-Roman creed—but one which centers on (and protects) Jews and Judaism. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

Judaism marks a kind of "Jahwehist supremacy." According to the Bible, a roving band of slaves, malcontents, liars, and fanatics were "the chosen people" and, indeed, the wicked god they worshiped invented the universe! It's comical and grotesque when looked at with clear eyes. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

The key thing is that everyone involved in original Christianity was a) Jewish and b) possessed by a seething resentment of Rome, much as Jews loathed every expression of Aryan dominance and greatness throughout world history. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

Nietzsche admired Jesus, as a pure-of-heart mystic. Skribina is more inclined towards the "Rebel" or "Zealot" theory, which Reza Aslan recently plagiarized in a book by that title. Jesus was likely crucified as a revolutionary—a wannabe Jewish king, not a rabbi or peacenik. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

In essence, the actual Jesus, if he existed, was something altogether different than the icon of Jesus that came to be known over the past 2,000 years. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

I say that his book is incomplete in the sense that Skribina takes Nietzsche's insight and intuition from *The Anti-Christ* and fleshes it out, but then leaves a lot of questions unanswered. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

Skribina builds an excellent framework for thinking about the historicity of Jesus, the original and real nature of the Christ movement, and who really "invented Christianity." — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

*Tucker’s not racist! No, you’re a racist!* That’s gonna be a really successful strategy, man. Not at all demoralizing to the southern base of GOP voters. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

@TammerR81 @akarlin88 Insanely stupid opinion. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

@akarlin88 Who said this? — PolitiTweet.org