Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 129 of 210.
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
RT @NRSC: Joint statement from @NRSC, @NRCC, @GOP and @realDonaldTrump campaign on @Google's policy change: https://t.co/Dv24yM5HJl — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
RT @TimCameron: Dear @sundarpichai & @Kent_Walker: There is not a lot Trump & Democrats agree on these days. But they agree your recent ad… — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
🤣🤣🤣 — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
RT @GaryCoby: Our Democracy relies on an informed electorate. Google's actions ensures voters will NOT learn about the issues most importan… — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
Our Democracy relies on an informed electorate. Google's actions ensures voters will NOT learn about the issues most important to them. It'll force campaigns to run generic ads appealing to the widest audiences. Voters will care less, vote less, & it'll suppress voter turnout. — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
By severely restricting political advertising, Google is stifling the ability of citizens to participate in our democracy. This will affect voters in the Dem primaries as well as in the 2020 general election. They're clamping down on voter engagement & suppressing voter turnout — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
Google’s latest arbitrary rule changes are a blatant attempt to suppress voter information, knowledge, and engagement in the 2020 election. These actions will lead directly to suppressing voter turnout. — PolitiTweet.org
Brad Parscale - Text TRUMP to 88022 @parscale
@GOP @NRSC @NRCC Full text: https://t.co/gPU18Cc9Bn
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
Google’s latest arbitrary rule changes are a blatant attempt to suppress voter information, knowledge, and engagement in the 2020 election. These actions will lead directly to suppressing voter turnout. — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
RT @parscale: Google’s latest arbitrary rule changes are a blatant attempt to suppress voter information, knowledge, and engagement in the… — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
RT @DiamondandSilk: If the Republican party has no place for Racism, then every Republican should denounce Ana Navarro's Racist Tweet! http… — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
RT @tankcat: Hey @jack I’m news now please approve me to run ads on @Twitter https://t.co/FqDUlKyHNM https://t.co/xIEPoo8RED — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
RT @TimCameron: Wonder if @Facebook’s executive team will do their former colleague a huge favor and keep all Bloomberg News ads out of the… — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
RT @LaraLeaTrump: SO PROUD! The animals thank you, Mr. President! 🐶🐱🙏🏽 https://t.co/uFMdCbPrrn — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
RT @TimCameron: And we have no idea if Bloomberg News is putting money behind anti-Trump ads since both Facebook and Google exclude Bloombe… — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
@robleathern @kevinroose @fbnewsroom @katieharbath No, not a specific org. The data is important to look at in aggregate. Same w/ candidates, orgs, & any advertisers running political or issue ads. Given Facebook is choosing to hide certain orgs, would FB be willing to release a list of the orgs who recieve special treatment? — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
RT @elonmusk: Cybertruck pulls F-150 uphill https://t.co/OfaqUkrDI3 — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
RT @mshields007: WinRed fully operational and crushing it for Elise -> Elise Stefanik’s rise tests new GOP fundraising platform WinRed http… — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
@kevinroose @robleathern @fbnewsroom @katieharbath LOL @kevinroose Don’t think this one would be caught up in Facebook’s political and issue ad rules. We can let this one go once turned off. — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
@robleathern @fbnewsroom @katieharbath How? You hide the ads from public view once they are inactive No one is allowed to export the historic targeting & spend data in aggregate, if paid for by media I support ad transparency. I’m glad Facebook is doing it. I just wish it included all ads influencing our elections — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
@jason_kint @maggieNYT The press is a cornerstone influencer in our political process. Why wouldn’t we want max transparency regarding ads they’re choosing to run, the voters they’re targeting, & the amount of money they’re spending to do so? Make it a separate section. But why hide from the public? — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
RT @GaryCoby: @maggieNYT Are NYT journos barred from discussing this topic since it’s a loophole which benefits the NYT? Or you don’t thin… — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
@maggieNYT Wow. Maggie throwing out a dem operative talking point to deflect from a legitimate question regarding transparency in our political process. — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
@jason_kint @maggieNYT Jason, you feel if Bloomberg News Org writes bias articles to favor candidate Bloomberg and then Bloomberg News spends $100M to show those headlines to swing voters or Dem primary voters, that those ads, the targeting data, & spend data shouldn’t be persevered for the public? — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
@maggieNYT Are NYT journos barred from discussing this topic since it’s a loophole which benefits the NYT? Or you don’t think the media is a cornerstone influencer in our pol process? If the former, isn’t that similar to Bloomberg News turning a blind eye to news critical of Bloomberg? — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
@maggieNYT Maggie, do you support FB scrubbing & removing pol ads, when paid for by news orgs, from the 7yr ad transparency archive? Why wouldn’t we all want 100% transparency? Why hide ads by Bloomberg News that target swing voters in Michigan? What if they spend $100M targeting voters? — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
@maggieNYT Maggie, do you think Bloomberg News’ paid ads on Facebook, regarding the POTUS race and targeted to swing voters or early primary states should be hidden from the public? Or should they be saved to the 7yr political ad archive like every other industry in America? — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
RT @GaryCoby: @jason_kint @NateSilver538 @kevinroose 1. Didn’t run tiny/niche audiences. Trump ads are targeted wider than anyone in politi… — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
RT @GaryCoby: .@fbnewsroom @robleathern @katieharbath: You aware Facebook executives, who worked at FB when the news media loophole was add… — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
.@fbnewsroom @robleathern @katieharbath: You aware Facebook executives, who worked at FB when the news media loophole was added, have left FB to bankroll fake news sites? You’re allowing targeted misinformation, hidden from the public, via a loophole & your execs are funding it. — PolitiTweet.org
Gary Coby @GaryCoby
Can @facebook @fbnewsroom please make a statement on why they’re allowing bias news orgs to run ads targeting swing voters and then hiding those ads from the public by not including them in the 7yr ad archive? — PolitiTweet.org
