Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet interface.

Showing page 48 of 94.

Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

I did not say or imply that a candidate could do anything to reassure his reelection, only that seeking help in an… https://t.co/vI4DgR8LEz — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

I pointed out how open ended that argument is because politicians honestly believe that their reelection helps the national interest. (MTC) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

Anyone watching my answer would know that it was in response to the manager’s claim that any electoral benefit would constitute an impeachable quid pro quo. (MTC) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

My point is that these are complex issues and that the Framers did not intend impeachment for mixed motive decision… https://t.co/wCKOJTN8hq — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

What it if turned out that a reason he broke his promise was that his political advisors warned him that bombing Sy… https://t.co/atOCzcv3wC — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

I gave another hypothetical. President Obama promised to bomb Syrian military targets if Assad used chemical weapo… https://t.co/Uy728EX9Lo — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

I gave as an example mixed motive President Lindon’s decision to send troops home from the battlefield to Indiana so that they would vote for his party. He genuinely believed that his party’s victory in Indiana was essential to the war effort, but it also helped him politically. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

I said that the 3rd was often the reality of politics and that helping one's own re-election efforts cannot — by it… https://t.co/rO2jjlMQSD — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

What I said was that there are 3 broad categories of relevant motive: 1) pure national interest ( help the militar… https://t.co/NUH7snktiI — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

They characterized my argument as if I had said that if a president believes that his re-election was in the natio… https://t.co/u1v4tJOwbs — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

They characterized my argument as if I had said that if a president believes that his re-election was in the national interest, he can do anything. I said nothing like that, as anyone who actually heard what I said can attest. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

Taking advantage of the fact most of their viewers didn’t actually hear the senate Q and A, CNN, MSNBC and some other media willfully distorted my answers. More to Come — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

(3 OF 3) If Warren knew anything about criminal law she would understand the distinction between motives – which are not elements of crime—and intent, which is. It’s the responsibility of presidential candidates to have a better understanding of the law. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 28, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

She also willfully mischaracterized what I said, claiming that I spoke about “intent.” I challenge her to find that word anywhere in my presentation. I talked about the difficulty of discerning mixed motives. (2 of 3 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 28, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

Warren doesn’t understand the law. My former colleague, Senator Warren, claims she could not follow my carefully laid out presentation that everybody else seemed to understand. This says more about Warren than it does about me. (1 of 2) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 28, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

(3 of 3 cont) To the extent therefore that my 1998 off-the-cuff interview statement suggested the opposite, I retract it. Scholars learn to adapt and even change old views as they do more research. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 21, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

(3 of 3)So I have now thoroughly researched the issue and concluded that although a technical crime with all the elements may not be required, criminal like behavior akin to treason and bribery is required. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 21, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

(2of 3 Therefore, I didn’t research the issue; I relied on the academic consensus that a crime was not required. In Trump impeachment, on the other hand, that is the critical issue, because abuse of power and obstruction of congress are neither crimes nor criminal- like behavior. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 21, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

(1 of 3)To the extent there are inconsistencies between my current position and what I said 22 years ago, I am correct today. During the Clinton impeachment, the issue was not whether a technical crime was required, because he was charged with perjury. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 21, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

Tribe’s call to consider impeaching President Reagan demonstrates how promiscuously he and others deploy the vague term “abuse of power” against political opponents, and why it is not a constitutionally permissible criteria for impeachment. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 21, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

In 1987, Larry Tribe suggested the impeachment of President Ronald Reagan for his alleged role in the Iran-Contra matter: Therein lies what appears to be the most serious breach of duty by the president – a breach that may well entail an impeachable abuse of power …” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 21, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

Tribe so afraid of the Senate hearing my constitutional arguments that he actually says, I “should not be allowed”… https://t.co/VG9uxEqpFc — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 20, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

Tribe is trying to sensor my arguments . The headline of Tribe’s article says it all: “Trump’s lawyer shouldn’t be… https://t.co/Lll0EMNedC — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 20, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

I have since learned that Justice Curtis, defending Andrew Johnson, strengthened that view, and I plan to quote from Curtis’ argument. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 20, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

There is no inconsistency between what I said during the Clinton impeachment and what I am saying now. I said then… https://t.co/KfnVQlTmkP — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 20, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

(3of 3) He is participating in this impeachment trial to defend the integrity of the Constitution and to prevent t… https://t.co/rgTLbixuB2 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 17, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

(2 of 3) While Professor Dershowitz is non partisan when it comes to the constitution—he opposed the impeachment of… https://t.co/d8Np3EzIco — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 17, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

STATEMENT REGARDING PROFESSOR DERSHOWITZ’S ROLE IN THE SENATE TRIAL - Professor Dershowitz will present oral argume… https://t.co/YBTOgiyh6U — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 17, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

Take me up on my challenge. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 12, 2020
Profile Image

Alan Dershowitz @AlanDersh

To all my Twitter detractors who presume, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that I engaged in sexu… https://t.co/T1RWJsBTyv — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 12, 2020