Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 209 of 873.
nilay patel @reckless
@SnazzyQ The garment hook really got me — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@JasonAten @gruber it was perfect the other way — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@gruber Apple is saying it's "metadata buttons" on background when it's a lift from 3.1.1 which makes it abundantly clear???? That is rich https://t.co/TAeZTFoG4O — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
RT @backlon: Apple won the vast, vast majority of issues Epic tried to bring up, but also I feel like all of those were long shots. But the… — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@accretivegrowth @gruber @pkafka @backlon Except the one claim which we are discussing here, and which remedy appears to contain significant ambiguity that any developer can litigate — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@accretivegrowth @gruber @pkafka @backlon Judges don't often write opinions with strident language about increasing competition and transparency and forget to close the biggest loophole possible, I guess — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@accretivegrowth @gruber @pkafka @backlon Well, that's a footnote. She's saying Epic's hypo of doing Apple IAP with different payment processors would not result in a change. But it's another deeply gray area https://t.co/X0zIE1Oc2j — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@gruber @pkafka @backlon What's interesting is that it doesn't matter what Apple thinks -- if someone puts in a buttons that pops a webview and Apple says no, it goes to the court to decide — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@pkafka @backlon Sure. What if you pop a web view? — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
The most important story out of the Epic / Apple ruling https://t.co/mpTOr60mpc — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@pierce I do what I can — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
RT @pierce: "Apple did not respond to a request for comment on the difference between buttons and external links" is the most @reckless sen… — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@eriqgardner Well, that. Also if it does that it will have to set a rate that makes sense, build a tracking and collection system that can be audited, and generally engage with this as the status quo instead of appealing it and requesting a stay — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@pkafka @backlon Ruling suggests YGR found this rule to be very bad and wanted to just get rid of it, narrowly. https://t.co/RZjSUxDpyl — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@bradkovach I might not be clear enough: this button is a good EXAMPLE of a "button that directs customers to a purchasing mechanism." Apple cannot prohibit any such buttons anymore, incl for digital goods. — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@bradkovach read the post! — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@joshhunt Yes -- because it's physical goods. And now a very useful example of a button that directs users to a purchasing mechanism — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@pkafka @backlon I think Apple wants that to be the case very badly — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
Here is a very very important button that directs customers to a purchasing mechanism. Apple is no longer allowed to prohibit these buttons in apps. So... are the doors wide open? https://t.co/3qTQVMj6rf https://t.co/zpqgHzeXUw — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
Here's me on the most important question from the Epic / Apple injunction: what's the difference between a button and an external link? https://t.co/3qTQVMj6rf — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
(Yes we are doing an emergency Vergecast. Need to finish all the coverage on the site first tho!) — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
Judge not terribly impressed with how Epic started this fight with Apple https://t.co/52Vz4Vs6BC — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@radiocolin Yes. I would not buy the spin here at all — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
Apple's anti-steering rules are "an incipient violation of antitrust law" regardless of Epic failing to prove its case, says judge. https://t.co/O0Wh05jMxE — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
Judge not impressed with analogies between the (digital) app store and (physical) retail stores at all https://t.co/DpGmPsiFnx — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
Relevant for future armchair antitrust analysis: the court disagreed with both Apple and Epic's proposed market definitions and came up with its own https://t.co/JJwfxMkYdW — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@sostevensays @iglehart97 @reksveks Easy to be confident when I am looking at the text! — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@iglehart97 Read the ruling. It will be instructive for you. — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@iglehart97 You know I am looking at the ruling, right. You should try looking at it too. https://t.co/Bpt2fN4k09 — PolitiTweet.org
nilay patel @reckless
@sostevensays Sorry boo — PolitiTweet.org
