Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 61 of 178.
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
When the world is in its productive phase, it insulates top minds. It pays them to stay away from short term market incentives. When the world is in its extractive phase, it subordinates top minds. And you can read about this in my new book for $29.95!! Plus, if you act now... — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
@Web_IV Really? News. Science. Community. Romance. Family. Civics. Military. Healing professions. Work on your approach? It’s neither fair, nor kind nor accurate. — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
Markets functioned best when they did not overpower ALL non-market forces. Not every good idea is a business. But we are now teaching people that non-market ideas are almost always D.O.A. That would be a terrible way to lose capitalism. Family, culture, science etc also matter. — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
@illogicalUSA @HeritageGuitars Lemon burst. Nothing against Gibson. I have dreams about Flying V's and @AlecBenjamin once let me play his ES335 (on stage!) which I will treasure for ever. But @heritageguitar folks are powerfully persuasive and I have been favoring this beauty over my 26 year old mexican Strat. — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
@WriteintheD *Majorana — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
@illogicalUSA @HeritageGuitars. Don’t own a Gibson. — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
@DrBrianKeating I am not aware that the standard model and GR “work fine”: CKM, PNMS, Strong CP, Mass Hierarchy issues, CC origin, origins of internal symmetry, initial singularity and black hole singularity, Miniboone, etc. all require explanation. If that’s what she means, I say it’s wrong. — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
@WriteintheD Axions to handle Strong CP. Sterile Neutrinos with Majorans See Saw to handle mass hierarchy. Inflatons to mediate inflation. Etc — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
Let’s hold off on the scoring of internet points and see if she can clarify. I think it is just a wording problem. — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
I agree with her wholeheartedly on A). I hope she just means A). Because she would be dead wrong on B) & C). The Yukawa couplings & quartic potential of the Higgs as stated are extremely ad hoc. And seemingly correct. I don’t think she would ever make that error scientifically. — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
Sabine is describing 3 separate practices. A) Predicting extremely poorly motivated particles to stay busy. B) Predicting seemingly Ad Hoc solutions where there is a genuine need long before there is motivation (e.g. the Higgs particle). C) Predicting Well-motivated particles. — PolitiTweet.org
Sabine Hossenfelder @skdh
It's 2022 and I still have particle physicists coming at me defending searches for particles they have invented tha… https://t.co/zy94CllPl4
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
@MimeTravel I’m not. But there is only one way to find out. — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
@HaackRick @White_Shadow81 Is PCR a Straussian critique of Fauci’s COVID response? Or is PRC a message to Chinese handlers in Beijing? We should ask @realclearpolicy. ;-) — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
@HaackRick @White_Shadow81 Lexicographical order is “Fealty”?! Take a walk outside brother. Not everything is politics. Promise. — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
@White_Shadow81 I chose alphabetical. — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
@sneakin @elonmusk Addressed. Thanks. https://t.co/vUFGiwYF2n — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
@jetpen https://t.co/twBP8ARlrF — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
@sneakin @elonmusk https://t.co/CkDXh91Im5 — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
So if #ufotwitter ever wanted to know why I didn’t take #UFO seriously, it was because I thought it was *preposterous* given lack of evidence. And if #ScienceTwitter wants to know why I spun on a dime, it’s because it IS linked to the post-Einsteinian physics of our survival. 🙏 — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
Hence my interest in UAP. UAP from distant worlds would be a strong indication that it is possible to diversify our shared risk which is that all known technological life is dependent on one atmosphere linking our three main existential risks: A) Climate B) Pathogen C) Radiation — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
If life is abundant & we’re not the top of the hierarchy (which is reasonable to me), I’d guess that UAP would be here if that is possible in Einstein’s successor theories. The absence of UAP is strong but *inconclusive* proof that Einstein’s restrictions persist in all theory. — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
But if we can leave to explore the universe by going beyond Einstein, anyone else out there can visit. This brings us to UFO/UAP. Assuming a distribution of life in the cosmos:: some life is behind us in science, with others ahead. A (loose) argument then links UAP to survival: — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
But if we can leave to explore the universe by going beyond Einstein, anyone else out there can visit. This brings us to UFO/UAP. Assuming a distribution of life in the cosmos. Some life is behind us in science, with others ahead. A (loose) argument then links UAP to survival: — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
I’m not going to complicate the basic story with caveats. That’s the basic plot. Either there is freedom to leave based on new ideas, like GU, or the Einsteinian restrictions will persist. If they persist; we probably can mildly elongate survival here by decades via wisdom. — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
Under Newton, we were free to explore the cosmos: 1686-1905. Einstein then enforced house arrest to our solar system:1905-Now. @elonmusk then said chemical rockets could get us 2 more spheres w Newtonian laws. But survival hinges on going *beyond* Einstein, not back to Newton. — PolitiTweet.org
Philosopher Kin (& Bridport Litter Picker) @rogerahicks
@veryonlinetony @EricRWeinstein @Clubhouse Did you really say that, Eric? Like EVERY civilisation before us, not d… https://t.co/BPVio3KpW8
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
Why? Because in Science you are allowed to question. To guess. To err. To correct. To change your mind. To retract. To speculate. To grow. Because in Science you have duties of collegial behavior. Every scientist is a crackpot in “The Science.” Remember that, if nothing else. — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
Science > “The Science” — PolitiTweet.org
Mike Hart, M.D @drmikehart
I am now permanently banned from @LinkedIn for sharing peer-reviewed research. Censorship has gone way too far.… https://t.co/XYmnRCSynZ
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
Every graph that can show the same effect, shows the same effect. — PolitiTweet.org
Walter Hickey @WaltHickey
not gonna lie the first time I generated this data and chart it was so jaw dropping I immediately checked to confir… https://t.co/wenDJhnnVx
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
@420samurai This is you? If so, I remember both of your generosity of spirit. I try to keep these with me at all times. https://t.co/wmjWyQtaLf — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein
@NGamblin You don’t mess around! Gorgeous. Congratulations!! — PolitiTweet.org
