Eric Weinstein

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

@PMayrgundter The physics community always leans on the same arguments that don’t work. I just try to move the conversation and they move to defense. So it is predictable. But I always hope I will learn something instead. Happy to be wrong. But usually it is just a defense of the Status Quo. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

@arivero Not my read. It took place just before the G-S anomaly cancellation. The Murray keynote is the best summary of the problem that lead to the String Theology. It mentions String Theory but doesn’t focus on it. It is the last gasp before the transition. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

RT @DrBrianKeating: It’s pretty obvious Eric is genuinely interested in fundamental physics. It’s not a grift or scheme. It was a good-fait… — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

@emperor_haplo Happy to learn. But you didn’t say anything yet… so…. Yeah. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

This is incompetent statecraft. And I want the one tool we have: HEARINGS. We need to know what is in our lungs. Our brains. Our hearts. Our children. What is this virus? What are these injections? What is in our children. Feel free to find another feed. But I’m not budging.🙏 — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

Congratulations if you think this came from a pangolin. Mazal Tov if you think it is a plandemic. Mubarak if you think Ivermectin is a perfect solution. Good for you if you think the vaccines are totally safe. I DISAGREE. We are *guessing*. And I’m done guessing. I want to know. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

What I believe is most probable is that we are looking at a BWC workaround through @EcoHealthNYC funded by @doddtra with accompanying injections rushed into production. That is only a guess. Why? Because my government won’t level w me. And PV is good enough to call for hearings. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

I’m looking to end the revolving door between regulators & the regulated. I want *massive* revelations about the Public Health and @doddtra @EcoHealthNYC nexus. Bottom line: check my Twitter bio. I will do anything necessary to get to the bottom of this. This is about hearings. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

So I will use my feed relentlessly to push for information. Investigation. Hearings. I do *not* find PV reliable enough to put weight on. I *do* find PV reliable enough to call for others to investigate their claims. I despise their methods. But I tell them that *directly*. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

I have no plan at all for a CDC/NIH/AMA that I can’t trust. What do I do with newspapers that obviously do not report all the news fit to print on this topic? How do I deal with Pharma companies that hire their previously underpaid regulators? Ergo I must take what we can get. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

It’s wonderful that many of you feel like this situation is obvious. I think it is not. Many of you believe hearings are impossible or would do nothing. I disagree. Many of you feel PV is always wrong or always right. I don’t see that. What I KNOW is that I am being deceived. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

It’s not beneath me. I’m a father starved for reliable information by my government, who had to make family decisions for my kids. You’re seeing a man in pain with no biological or medical training. This feed pushes for hearings all the time as we used to do. And I still do. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

This was my PV decision tree from last night. Are we on Branch A, B or C? My guess is that you don’t yet know either. Can this be cleared up without hearings? If not, why not join me in calling for hearings? But if you are in a position to know, please tell us how. Thanks. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

But James breaks real news as in the Amy Robach hot mic tape just as he also exaggerates and distorts what he has at other times. Are you in a position to say where we are on the PV spectrum? No one can say how real this is without supporting evidence. Are you in that position? — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

Have you seen materials that fan keep those of us who are confused from speculating? Specifically: Is this person EXACTLY who PV claims he is? Is this a drunken date? Is this man creating intrigue to seduce? Etc. Methods that are nauseating & prone to error are used here. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

No one is arguing that the video is not explosive. What is dividing us is whether it is what James O’Keefe says it is. He is neither always wrong as his critics say nor always correct as supporters claim. And his methods are disturbing & prone to picking up drunken date bragging. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

*Batesian Autocorrect doesn’t know it apparently. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

@pcervigon Autocorrect. Damn. Thanks! — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

@Jamesfooty1 See I was thinking pads of paper, pens, and a whiteboard or blackboard. Maybe some coffee. A bit of LaTeX. But that’s just me not getting it. Forgive me. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

@caseylolsen I have no underlying animosity towards Mike. Let’s see what happens next. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

@caseylolsen I’m have no animosity to Mike. Let’s see what happens next. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

@caseylolsen Nah. It’s a sensitive topic. Almost 40 years of string theology. 50 years of stagnation. 70 years of quantum gravity not shipping a theory. I get it. But snark is a tell. The youngest Nobel particle theorist is over 70. I think 8 are alive. It’s really bad. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

@MBKplus Sorry to be slow, but you used a screenshot so I wouldn’t see your response rather than a quote tweet. Not big on snark. But here is a proper response. Didn’t know the history had become so obscure to modern physicists. My bad. Thread: — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

@MBKplus Sorry to be slow, but you used a screenshot so I wouldn’t see your response rather than a quote tweet. Not big on snark. But here is a proper response. Didn’t know the history he become so obscure to modern physicists. My bad. Thread: — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

Lastly, I can't stand anti-collegial snark. We can escalate if you want, but if instead you would like to have a serious discussion next time, it would be my pleasure. Shall we try this again? I'm Eric. Huge fan of what you guys do. Big supporter. Nice to meet you. Thanks. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

I have thought this through. It isn't a cheap shot. And I have waited until the 50th anniversary to be this frontal about it. But it has never been controversial since Planck to suggest that aged failed leaders are a huge issue. I'm not the Funeral by Funeral guy. He was. ;-) — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

As to what's wrong with modern physics: let's start with Quantum Gravity. Bryce DeWitt started a failed 70 year wild goose chase in 1953 that is not working. If we lost 20 years on conflating Bare v Dressed masses, we just lost 70 years on Quantum Gravity. Maybe take a time out? — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

So...feel free to try to snark your way out of this. But I'll stand my ground. We don't need to go "Funeral by Funeral", but I'm tiring of "Calabi-Yau Phenomenology" or Multiverse excuses as a replacement for actual physics. We need to go back to science. https://t.co/3By75Pz2m4 — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

That isn't the issue. The issue is that the leadership is not passing the baton and there are no McInnes or Jewett figures. And professors now don't even know this history it seems! Don't they teach this in Physics class? Maybe it's too dangerous to learn how physics works. ;-) — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

Those 3 conferences fixed the problem of infinites destroying the explanatory power of QED. So I padded the HELL out of those numbers because I think the stagnations are similar with the major problem being leadership. I could be wrong. But it might take $1/2 Million to test it. — PolitiTweet.org