Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 84 of 295.
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
“[People] assume that if you work with the fossil fuel industry, that you're bad and that that's a corrupt motivation. Whereas from my perspective, I would start to assume something good if they were in that industry” With @FlorioGina https://t.co/Thb8d6iIUA — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
“The most shutdowns over the past 10 years have occurred with reliable, resilient coal plants. When coal plants were at retirement age and replaced more cheaply by gas plants, shutdowns made sense. But most coal was retired early, at great cost” https://t.co/I9FKC0DCNP — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Special thanks to @RepPfluger for introducing me today at @RepublicanStudy. https://t.co/tZF5qOF1mK — PolitiTweet.org
Rep. August Pfluger @RepPfluger
.@AlexEpstein is a strong voice for America’s energy future. He takes a smart approach to the complex issue of ener… https://t.co/3duqFmQ73r
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Thanks to @RepublicanStudy for the opportunity to share my “energy freedom” policy ideas today. I am proud to offer an independent, objective policy perspective to politicians of any party. https://t.co/LeGb8nHIAe — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
RT @RepPfluger: .@AlexEpstein is a strong voice for America’s energy future. He takes a smart approach to the complex issue of energy polic… — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
“one of my most powerful arguments has been just that billions of people lack low cost, reliable energy.” Watch the full interview with @PeterMcCormack on @WhatBitcoinDid: https://t.co/Gg4dO3u42J Get Fossil Future: https://t.co/KvYDUsA0dx https://t.co/mEaUDJ2Ztg — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
"As the regulatory state expands inexorably at the expense of free markets and human liberty, we need more people like Alex Epstein." - @tilakdoshi https://t.co/kMOR1Yv9A6 — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
If you're new to my work, follow me @AlexEpstein for extreme clarity on energy, environmental, and climate issues from a humanist perspective. Also, subscribe to my newsletter, featuring lots of concise, powerful, well-referenced energy talking points. https://t.co/NS8O3mRx71 — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Summary: America can stop the decline of our grid and move toward low-cost, reliable, and cleaner electricity by ending all preferences for unreliable electricity: 1. Require tech-neutral reliability standards 2. End all solar/wind subsidies 3. End all solar/wind mandates — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Policy solution: End all mandates for unreliable solar and wind These mandates, which require areas to use solar/wind and shut down reliable fossil fuels and nuclear, regardless of the impact on cost and reliability, should be ended at every level: national, state, and local. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Unreliability preference 3: mandates for unreliables Even beyond paying a premium for unreliable electricity, many states mandate a certain % of unreliable solar and wind—and states are becoming more and more aggressive with those mandates. Another dire threat to our grid. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Policy solution: End all subsidies for unreliables. Abolish the Investment Tax Credit and Production Tax Credit. Stop "green hydrogen" subsidies. Require generators using solar/ wind to pay for the extra infrastructure they need instead of forcing others to foot the bill. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
The combo of no price penalty for unreliability + special subsidies for unreliables means that instead of unreliables receiving far less $ than reliables, they get a huge premium. And more and more reliable power plants go out of business. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Solar and wind subsidies not only drive the shutdown of reliable power plants and loot taxpayers, they also inflate electricity prices. Because solar and wind can go near-zero at any given time, they don’t replace most of the costs of reliable power plants—they add to them. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Another form of subsidy to eliminate: government subsidizing unreliable solar/wind by socializing their costs, such as additional transmission lines or redundant backup capacity. This subsidy further rewards unreliable electricity at the expense of reliables and of customers. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Another solar/wind subsidy of the IRA is "green hydrogen." The IRA forces us to give those who make hydrogen using solar and wind an extra $3/kg. That’s twice the normal market price! This is like forcing taxpayers to pay gas stations an extra $8/gallon! — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
The "Inflation Reduction Act" pretended to be pro-nuclear by including nuclear under "clean energy" subsidies. But since nuclear overregulation makes new plants cost-prohibitive, the IRA’s endless "clean energy" subsidies created an endless trough for solar/wind. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Solar/wind subsidies are driving reliable power plants out of business, leading to higher costs and lower reliability. Ominously, the "IRA" recently extended them *indefinitely*. A future Congress should end solar/wind subsidies, driving lower prices + higher reliability. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
The "ITC" and "PTC" solar and wind subsidies pay utilities to shut down or slow down reliable gas and coal plants whenever the sun shines or the wind blows. This defunds reliable plants, causing many to be shut down. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Unreliability preference 2: huge subsidies for unreliables Subsidies for unreliable electricity, above all the Investment Tax Credit and the Production Tax Credit, force taxpayers to pay huge amounts of extra money to unreliable solar and wind generators. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
With tech-neutral reliability standards, electricity "markets" can function as competitive markets—lowering costs and raising reliability—since all competitors will have to offer the same level of value. Vs. today’s insanity of valuing reliability and unreliability equally. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Any company or academic who believes that solar/wind can be cost-effective generation sources on a large scale should welcome tech-neutral reliability standards. They can try to prove their ideas on the market—not force us to use unreliables and then trust that it’ll work out. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Tech-neutral reliability standards may well lead to innovative, truly cost-effective uses of solar and wind—e.g., solar/gas/battery hybrid generators in sunny parts of the country that can provide reliable electricity at lower costs. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Tech-neutral reliability standards do not prevent solar/wind from being used. They simply require that generators who want to use solar/wind take responsibility for combining it with reliables and/or storage to guarantee reliability. Instead of foisting responsibility on others. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Policy solution: Electricity markets should require all generators to meet technology-neutral reliability standards. FERC and ERCOT (the TX regulator) should set reliability standards that all competitors must meet—not allow some to sell unreliable electricity, as they do now. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
Unreliability preference 1: no price penalty for being unreliable In almost every area of life we pay far more for a reliable service than for an unreliable one. But in electricity, unfair rules make utilities pay the same for unreliable solar/wind as they do for reliables. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
The cause A root cause of America’s cost and reliability problems is extreme preferences for unreliable solar and wind electricity: 1) no price penalty for being unreliable 2) huge subsidies for unreliables 3) mandates for unreliables Here’s how they work and how to fix them. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
The Problem Although America could have world-leading electricity, the American grid is instead becoming a national embarrassment—with rising costs and mounting reliability problems, most problematically in California and Texas but now spreading around the country. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
The Opportunity America, given its combination of abundant domestic energy resources, technological ingenuity, and free-market competition, has the potential to have the best grid in the world—providing electricity that is low-cost, ultra-reliable, and increasingly clean. — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein
End preferences for unreliable electricity Today's grids are being ruined by systemic preferences for unreliable electricity: 1) no price penalty for being unreliable 2) huge subsidies for unreliables 3) mandates for unreliables Congress should end these now. 🧵👇 https://t.co/BaEDxeSBoE — PolitiTweet.org
