Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

19/ Do you recall this stunning report that just came and went like it wasn’t *mind-blowing*? TRUMP JR. to MEADOWS (pre-election): “We have operational control. It’s very simple—we have multiple paths [to win the election]. We control them all.” Um, WTF? https://t.co/TIIiTrO75r — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

18/ Here’s where the law comes in. PROOF has now—with this breaking news report—detailed an 8-point legal scheme by Trump’s lawyers to invest the judicial branch in its coup plot. This mirrors the 7-point Trump scheme that the HJ6C says was focused on *executive*-branch actions. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

17/ In other words, there was a test run for the May 2022 Dobbs leak 18 months before the Dobbs leak and that test run was immeasurably worse than the Dobbs leak because it was conducted as part of a cross-branch coup scheme that right now no one is reporting on or investigating. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

16/ I’m not trying to be coy here—the evidence suggests that the Dobbs leak was a Thomas-camp leak designed to pressure Kavanaugh and Barrett to overturn Roe. And it now appears Eastman thought he could use the same leak channel to pressure Kavanaugh and Barrett in December 2020. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @SethAbramson: (🔐) BREAKING NEWS: Trump Attorney John Eastman Responds to Allegations of Seditious Conspiracy with the Most Problematic… — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

15/ And Eastman’s hiding of those leaks puts him in such stunning danger of imminent federal indictment and imprisonment that it would take an enormous amount of loyalty not just to a cause but to a *person he has been dear friends with for decades* to justify that level of risk. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

14/ The lies told in Eastman’s just-published Substack essay are all part of a common plan or scheme that actually stretches back months and includes his 100+ invocations of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination before House investigators: he’s hiding SCOTUS leaks. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

13/ Worse still, it appears Trump lawyers *factored this privileged access to SCOTUS deliberations* into their coup plot, which means anyone who was leaking to Trump lawyers in December 2020 was assisting in a seditious conspiracy. And I think you all know where this is going. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

12/ The evidence suggests Trump’s lawyers repeatedly had non-public intel on secret SCOTUS deliberations in December 2020, 18 months before the evidence indicates—see the PROOF report below—Thomas or Alito aides began leaking on Dobbs to WSJ and Politico. https://t.co/WSumoeIOGf — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

11/ So now you have a sense of the stakes here. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

10/ That’s right—the far-right leak campaign originating inside the Supreme Court, which Justice Roberts says is one of the biggest threats to the Court in its history and began this year, in fact appears to have begun in December 2020 and relates *primarily* to the insurrection. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

9/ But it is *also* confusing because of the stuff that is truly shocking here: the stunning synchronicity between the December 2020 Supreme Court leaks *no one ever reported on* and the ones that Republicans decided to howl about when they arose in the Dobbs case in May of 2022. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

8/ The reason I call this report complex is because there are so many moving parts: multiple Trump lawyers; multiple dates, from December '20 to now; multiple forms of contact between Eastman and Ginni Thomas; multiple cases; and multiple forms of relief sought (e.g. injunction). — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

7/ ...the Proud Boys-and-Oath Keepers or, as in this breaking news report, Trump Legal-and-SCOTUS. Trump’s in the background—sometimes foreground—of this story, but the fundamental plot is one devised and executed by lawyers. I previewed this problem here: https://t.co/rl3tUpB9oN — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

6/ Because the focus of the HJ6C has understandably been on Trump, every hearing topic is naturally Trump-focused: Trump-and-Pence, Trump-and-DOJ, Trump-and-his-campaign advisers, and so on. It leaves no room to elide Trump from the picture for even a moment and consider, say... — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

5/ No one believes Clarence Thomas will ever recuse himself from a January 6 case—and few believe Ginni Thomas will ever give a cooperative interview with the House January 6 Committee. And the recently published (last 24 hours) lie-filled rant by John Eastman encapsulates *why*. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

4/ ...if you’ve been following January 6 news for the last 18 months you know how the story of Jim Jordan—sorry, Ginni Thomas—goes: it starts in claims of having nothing to hide and being willing to talk to the HJ6C and ends in lawyers, litigation, stonewalling, lies and silence. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

3/ This is almost impossible. The Committee has six months left in its lifespan and only four hearings left in its currently announced run of televised hearings (which have been incredibly well done and uniformly explosive). It has asked to speak to Clarence Thomas’s wife, but... — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

2/ I’ve tried to keep the legalese to a minimum here, but the fact remains this breaking news report is about the urgent necessity that the House January 6 Committee pivot to turn what’s presently an oversight investigation into one co-equal branch into an investigation of *two*. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

1/ Eastman’s Substack essay—the fact of it; its text; what it says and doesn’t say; the lies contained within it, both the painfully obvious and unhidden ones and the ones it takes an ardent January 6 researcher to see—is merely the jumping off point for a *very* complex report. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(🔐) BREAKING NEWS: Trump Attorney John Eastman Responds to Allegations of Seditious Conspiracy with the Most Problematic Substack Essay Ever Published I hope you’ll RETWEET this. Headline aside, you’ll find it’s about a potential coup scheme at SCOTUS. https://t.co/qIzaTL65h3 — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @CNN: Former Nixon White House counsel John Dean tells CNN's @wolfblitzer why he thinks the January 6 insurrection is "multiple times wo… — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @maggieNYT: A day after a portrait of Pence in danger, Trump attacks him again https://t.co/GflVj5K7tQ — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(UPDATE) I hope to have this breaking news drop at PROOF at 9PM ET tonight. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @SethAbramson: (PS) I should have emphasized that this breaking news is not just about John Eastman but also about Ginni Thomas, Clarenc… — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @SethAbramson: (📢) FEED NOTE: PROOF will publish a breaking news report on disgraced Trump attorney John Eastman tonight. Stay tuned and… — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS) I should have emphasized that this breaking news is not just about John Eastman but also about Ginni Thomas, Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court leaks, Donald Trump, the coming Dobbs decision, and a lot more information you have not read before. You will not be disappointed. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @SethAbramson: (📢) FEED NOTE: PROOF will publish a breaking news report on disgraced Trump attorney John Eastman tonight. Stay tuned and… — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(📢) FEED NOTE: PROOF will publish a breaking news report on disgraced Trump attorney John Eastman tonight. Stay tuned and subscribe below ($5 a month, cancel anytime) if interested. https://t.co/94g4fO0JZH — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@GayleSRose Incorrect. — PolitiTweet.org