Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

11/ And yet, as of December 21, 2020, Trump had never met or spoken with Jeffrey Clark. The House January 6 Committee seemed to think that Rep. Perry was the sole person behind the December 22—regulation-violating—Trump-Clark meeting in the Oval. I think they don’t have it right. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @SethAbramson: (🔐) BREAKING NEWS: New Revelations Further Implicate Ginni Thomas in the Events of January 6, and Usher in What May Be th… — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

10/ Added to those unprecedented oddities, what are the chances such a guy shows up to his first day of work with a doc he’s written with a Trump lawyer—and that just days after his hire his new boss is suddenly offered an illicit Oval Office visit? It’s Watergate-level intrigue. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

9/ Who hires an obscure election lawyer to work in the environmental-law division of DOJ in the midst of a presidential transition, when he might lose his job just 38 days post-hire? And for that matter—as Rachel Maddow asked—who has the *pull* to even make such a hire *happen*? — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

8/ I saw the excellent Katie Brenner of MSNBC say that she had tried to ask former DOJ colleagues of Klukowski about him, and it seemed that no one could even remember that he had been at DOJ. It was an ominous—and I should say "further"—sign something was not at all right here. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

7/ So it was just 96 hours ago that the nation learned about Ken Klukowski. He was not someone who researchers or journalists or authors had focused on, and candidly it took many in that sphere 24 to 48 hours to realize that Klukowski had suddenly become *central* to a coup plot. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

6/ Tentatively, I will say that it looks like the platform is back up and open for readers. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @SethAbramson: (🔐) BREAKING NEWS: New Revelations Further Implicate Ginni Thomas in the Events of January 6, and Usher in What May Be th… — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

5/ (FWIW, PROOF subscribers get every new report via email instantaneously—so at least thousands and thousands of people are reading the report right now! That said, I am pretty frustrated with Substack, ATM.) — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@The_Jett_Cam Will fix ASAP once I regain access to the platform. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

4/ Did I just break Substack? In any case, the entire website is now down. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

3/ This report doesn’t merely synthesize information provided to the public last Thursday but not expressly connected to Ginni Thomas—though it certainly could have been—it also curates a sizable tranche of new evidence connecting Ginni Thomas to Klukowski and his DOJ placement. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

2/ I believe this PROOF report provides sufficient evidence to indicate to any federal criminal investigator—and I used to be one—that, as an initial matter, the chief suspect to be the author of Ken Klukowski’s placement at DOJ, which was Step 1 in a coup plot, is Ginni Thomas. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

1/ After last Thursday’s bombshell-laden House January 6 Committee hearing—which I live-tweeted at the link below—a key question being asked by CNN and MSNBC was this one: how the hell did Ken Klukowski get placed at DOJ in mid-transition in December 2020? https://t.co/J52vY2QWc9 — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(UPDATE) The article is up—see my pinned tweet. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(🔐) BREAKING NEWS: New Revelations Further Implicate Ginni Thomas in the Events of January 6, and Usher in What May Be the Gravest Constitutional Crisis Since the American Civil War I hope you will subscribe, read, and RETWEET this urgent PROOF report. https://t.co/qhG0hxHqFg — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@Ginsburg I do not think it would be Brooks, for a variety of reasons. If it is not Cipollone, and apparently it is not, I would think it has to be either Alex Holder or someone completely out of left field. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@OriginalAngie Posted about it — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

Jonathan Karl—a *very* reliable reporter—says the witness tomorrow is *not* Pat Cipollone. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @SethAbramson: (📢) A new report on Ginni Thomas should be published at PROOF tonight. Stay tuned and subscribe below if you wish. This w… — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @lrozen: “Aides refused to divulge what additional evidence they planned to present on Tuesday or who would be testifying, saying that t… — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS6) Holder has definitely moved up in the rankings given his recent revelation that the Trump family knew that they were inciting violence on January 6 and intended to do so. A reader says Cipollone has been ruled out, but (*to be clear*) I have *not* seen that reporting yet. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

This is who Alex Holder is, BTW. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS5) I continue to believe Cipollone and Holder are the most likely, with Brooks a distant third and Alexander a distant fourth after that. I do not think it is Meadows. But all this is *of course* just idle speculation; I would never claim to know if I do not (and I *do not*). — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS4) Apparently Ali Alexander is claiming—or strongly implying—it's him. I don't know. If yes... well... God I hope the Committee has read *every word* at PROOF, because Alexander is one of the most dangerous men in America and putting him on live TV may well be actually insane. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS3) Just came back—have been head down on this new report—and saw people thought I meant "about" as in Ginni Thomas *being the witness*. No. Almost no chance of that. I meant the testimony could *concern* Thomas's actions. Holder is possible, but is he worth a special session? — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS2) As for who the surprise live witness could be—who the Committee, for the first time ever, is not announcing in advance—here are the top four candidates right now (in alphabetical order): ▪️ Ali Alexander ▪️ Mo Brooks ▪️ Pat Cipollone* ▪️ Alex Holder *Most likely candidate — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(UPDATE) Almost finished. This report will blow the doors off the barn. — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @SethAbramson: BREAKING NEWS: House January 6 Committee to Hold Surprise Hearing at 1PM Tomorrow; Topic Unknown But Some Anticipate Bomb… — PolitiTweet.org

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

RT @MacFarlaneNews: The committee released names of witnesses for *prior* hearings. They're NOT doing so ahead of tomorrow. It adds a l… — PolitiTweet.org