Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 412 of 3941.
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@JeffDCDC Many thx Jeff — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@SheaLadivabich Substack is ad-free by design (from its inception years ago, before I had even heard of it) — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@MoreMolecules Indeed. (And yes, I thought of this report as being like a book.) — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@Resatc34Resa đđ — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @SethAbramson: (đ) BREAKING NEWS: New Revelations Further Implicate Ginni Thomas in the Events of January 6, and Usher in What May Be th⌠— PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
PS7/ When I said âconstitutional crisis,â I wasnât exaggerating. I donât know how America goes forward with Clarence Thomas on the bench *without* a full federal investigationâby both Congress and the FBI/DOJ apparatusâinto who may have incriminating evidence about Ginni Thomas. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
PS6/ If I were the losing party in either the KENNEDY case or the MAINE case, I sure as hell would be focused like a laser on the possibility that the head of the group that won those two cases with Thomasâ vote *may* be in possession of evidence that incriminates the manâs wife. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
PS5/ The report has been updated to note that First Liberty Institute was the entity behind *both* the historic attacks on the Establishment Clause that Justice Thomas signed onto this week, despite the fact that the head of FLI may have correspondence that incriminates his wife. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@TryChick It's up now! — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@kris417 Should be up now! — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @hugolowell: First on @GuardianUS: Hearing tonight that the secret witness for tomorrowâs Jan. 6 committee hearing will have an entourag⌠— PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
PS4/ Based on what I know, if I were with the FBI and involved in seizing the phone of ex-presidential lawyer John Eastmanâand if I were looking for encrypted messages on that phoneâIâd be looking for messages to/from Ken Klukowski, Rudy Giuliani, Jeffrey Clark, and Ginni Thomas. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
PS3/ For those wondering if this new PROOF report is relevant to the just-announced FBI seizure (in New Mexico) of the cell phone of Trump lawyer John Eastman... oh, hell yes. John Eastman is probably the *second*-most referenced person in this new report. https://t.co/ilYhgC633A — PolitiTweet.org
Barb McQuade @BarbMcQuade
One of last weekâs search warrants was for John Eastmanâs phone. That usually means DOJ seeks encrypted messages. I⌠https://t.co/jveaglTO1t
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @SethAbramson: (đ) BREAKING NEWS: New Revelations Further Implicate Ginni Thomas in the Events of January 6, and Usher in What May Be th⌠— PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
PS2/ I donât know if Klukowskiâor anyone else for that matterâis tomorrowâs surprise witness. Iâve no info on this beyond ABC News reporting that it *isnât* Pat Cipollone, and Ali Alexanderâs likely false implication itâs him. I promise to tweet the moment I learn anything solid. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
PS/ Many thanks to all PROOF subscribers. Anyone who likes can get full access to the ~200 reports at PROOF, in under 60 seconds, for five bucks. Just go to https://t.co/94g4fNJ989. https://t.co/SKfZsElZHO — PolitiTweet.org
Manatees and Trees @timotheetee
@SethAbramson This may be the most important article you will ever read. I feel ill after learning this much about⌠https://t.co/jL7fCaNZ0t
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
25/ The Committee has asked Ginni Thomas to come forward. She has said she will...and there is no reason to believe her. She must be subpoenaed ASAP. Just so, Ken Klukowski must be subpoenaed. Clark and Eastmanâother key witnesses in thisâhave already pleaded the Fifth Amendment. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
24/ But PROOF is in a position, as federal investigators are now, to curate all of the available *evidence* to create a timeline of events and a network of associations tracing how and why and when Ken Klukowski came to end up at DOJ *and* who was in a position to know his plans. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
23/ One thing is clear: anyone involved in taking even *one* overt act to place Klukowski at DOJ in December 2020, who did so with knowledge of what Klukowski planned to do once in that job, was involved in a criminal conspiracy. The FBI and DOJ will have to determine who did so. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
22/ But PROOF isnât called PROOF because it guesses. PROOF curates evidence from far-flung reliable sources in the manner of a criminal investigation because I have substantial experience in criminal investigations. The Klukowski fact-pattern pointsâover and overâto Ginni Thomas. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
21/ Even if one had done no research at all on Klukowski, if a far-right lawyer with his credentials (Antonin Scalia Law School, Liberty University, The Federalist Society) were to suddenly appear on Trumpâs radar, anyone in the know would *guess* that Ginni Thomas was involved. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
20/ So itâs with this in mind that you should understand that Ginni Thomas was atop a *number* of pro-insurrection entities in fall 2020, was involved in helping to *form* Trumpâs legal teamâhaving spent years aiding Trump with staffingâ*and* helped author its post-election plan. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
19/ A fourth thing to understand is that Ginni Thomas wasnât just a Trump presidential adviserâshe was felt to be the *pushiest* and most *arrogant* of Trumpâs advisers, and it was felt that she acted this way *because* she knew how important her husband was (is) to Donald Trump. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
18/ A third thing to understand is that Ginni Thomas and Clarence Thomas arenât the typical couple. I can think of no couple in U.S. politics that has been routinely reported onâincluding with their friends as sourcesâas almost *obsessively* sharing *everything* with one another. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
17/ A second thing to understand is that Thomas was (is) as ardent an insurrectionist as anyone in America. She wanted Trumpâs enemies jailed and has spread the most insane conspiracy theories about the 2020 presidential election. One canât overstate how far right Mrs. Thomas is. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
16/ Ginni Thomas had (and has) personal ties to most of Trumpâs legal team, to countless members of Congress, and even to dangerous radicals like Ali Alexander. And as much as any single individual in the January 6 pantheon, she sought to *leverage* her access and her influence. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
15/ One of the many things those who have read these reports know that many others do not is that Ginni Thomas is not just a radical activist connected to Clarence Thomas. She was a Trump presidential adviser with privileged access to Trump, Meadows, Bannon... really, *everyone*. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
14/ And the *first* PROOF report on Ginni Thomas has just been unlocked (đ) and is below. PROOF is proud to have been on the leading edge of national coverage of Thomasâs role in the events of January 6 since the report here was published in January 2022: https://t.co/I58beieYgt — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
13/ The *second* of the three major investigative reports on Ginni Thomas PROOF has done was made available to the general public (đ) and is below. Iâve previously noted that the House has been in touch with PROOF, has cited PROOFâs work, and reads PROOF. https://t.co/kHPtpEygOE — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
12/ Perry was undoubtedly involved, but the story clearlyâbased on the evidence the Committee had and new evidence PROOF has now publishedâgoes beyond Perry. It takes a deep dive into Klukowskiâs past to uncover the story. This is what PROOF has doneâand it leads to Ginni Thomas. — PolitiTweet.org