Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 132 of 3941.
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @washingtonpost: “Today is a historic day,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in his nightly address. “The people of Kherson… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @kylegriffin1: Pelosi spokesman responds to McCarthy complaints about the reopening of the Capitol Complex: "The Minority Leader's inc… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@shelly2161 All addressed in the (free) report. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@CopernicusSees Yes, the article very much contemplates that they might not get the House at all—though they are still favored to do so. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@TheChantalSnow If they impeach, they almost certainly will get little done for the duration of the impeachment process. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@jaquerussell Disagree with what...? The article does not take a position to be disagreed with...? — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @oneunderscore__: A lot of people on this site who spent the last three years making a bunch of money calling content moderation a censo… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @SethAbramson: 🔓| NEW at PROOF: Have the Odds of a Biden Impeachment Changed? With control of Congress still up in the air, the questio… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
None of this requires—or even has anything to do with—ending identity-confirmed notability verification on Twitter. That was done out of pure, unadulterated *lust for vengeance* on Musk’s part, aimed at elites he felt had spurned him. Now he cloaks it in a cause. Super pathetic. — PolitiTweet.org
Elon Musk @elonmusk
Mainstream media will still thrive, but increased competition from citizens will cause them to be more accurate, as… https://t.co/MTVMlKlV6D
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
PS2/ In other words, if your reaction to this article, prior to reading it, is to angrily denounce the idea that Biden deserves impeachment, you *more than anyone* need to read this (free) article to understand how and why impeachment may *nevertheless* become a huge debate soon. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
PS/ It’s interesting that the most common response to this thread so far is to point out that there’s no basis to impeach Biden. Of *course* there isn’t—impeachment is a potent political weapon that (in GOP hands) has nothing to do with facts. And this article helps explain that. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@DaveyP_001 Of course. But your comment also underlines that you do not understand what sort of weapon impeachment is intended to be. You could really use this (free) article. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@PaulP38563981 See the article. 😶 — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@Allitnil42 @JanCj39 It’s not about the impeachment leading to a conviction. Hell, it’s not even about the impeachment *vote* in the House. The focus is on the impeachment *investigation*. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@abandy They have no grounds. But that will not stop them if they see a benefit in impeaching him, I promise you. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@Watuppa2 Discussed in the article, FWIW. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@redrose196 The what-for doesn’t matter—it’s the when and how and why *behind* the question of impeachment. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@SWTwoDelta Don’t count on it. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@ArtemisTweet Oh, I don’t think so. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
10/ Most folks don’t realize that the political party that could collapse the GOP already exists—it’s simply waiting for Donald Trump to grab its rudder and end the Republican Party forever. The question of whether to serve Trump’s campaign by impeaching Biden is related to this. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
9/ It’s for this reason the anticipated next PROOF report will be on a topic no one seems to want to talk about—the very real possibility that the GOP tries to withdraw from Trump post-election and Trump responds by bolting from the GOP and running in 2024 as head of a new party. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
8/ This last—rather obscene, but attenuated—thought underscores how the House leadership races this fall, and any shake-ups in House leadership that occur next year, could function as proxy battles connected to the 2024 GOP primaries (likely between Trump and DeSantis, at least). — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
7/ Then there are the more obscure (and distant) repercussions. Could McCarthy’s refusal to promise the House Freedom Caucus a Biden impeachment lead to a House Freedom Caucus member—even, if a *very* distant longshot, Marjorie Taylor Greene—becoming the new Speaker of the House? — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
6/ Remember, a Biden impeachment has *nothing* to do with *convicting* Biden. The Senate won’t convict Biden on any of the scurrilous prospective grounds presented thus far. But it has *everything* to do with the 2024 election, future control of Congress, and the *U.S. economy*. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
5/ So this report looks at the latest data on House control while also playing out a scenario in which the GOP gains control of Congress’s lower chamber. That includes a possibility the House Freedom Caucus will use the impeachment issue to keep McCarthy from the Speaker’s gavel. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
4/ There’s been so much (understandable) focus post-election on the horse-races still ongoing in Arizona, Nevada, California, and elsewhere that there’s been little talk of what’s at stake. Do folks realize the House January 6 Committee will continue if Democrats keep the House? — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
3/ Then there’s the larger picture: impeachment would basically end any hope of major legislative achievements to aid Americans in 2023; would be designed primarily to aid Trump’s 2024 campaign against Biden; would embolden insurrectionists; and would become a key campaign issue. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
2/ It’d be easy to term the question premature if not for (i) the GOP having already filed 8 separate articles of impeachment against Joe Biden (5 filed by Marjorie Taylor Greene), (ii) the GOP will soon vote on its new leadership—with the impeachment issue a key topic of debate. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
1/ This article comes at the question above from every angle: Will the GOP take the House? If so, who will lead it? Will that new leader agree to an impeachment? What are the obstacles? What would the purported grounds be? Would it be successful? What would be its actual purpose? — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
🔓| NEW at PROOF: Have the Odds of a Biden Impeachment Changed? With control of Congress still up in the air, the question of whether Republicans will try to impeach President Biden is at once hard to answer and essential to resolve. Hope you’ll RETWEET. https://t.co/BPsF7dD0sM — PolitiTweet.org
