Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 64 of 180.
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
Wokeness itself is anti-white. It’d be shocking if she were woke and not railing against whites, even if she were white herself. — PolitiTweet.org
New York Post @nypost
'Woke' Department of Defense equity chief has history of anti-white Twitter posts: report https://t.co/Ew7efQfeA0 https://t.co/IE7a5fX2o6
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
RT @JoelWBerry: The Babylon Bee's video making fun of Rings of Power now has more likes than the actual Rings of Power trailer https://t.co… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
What follows after conception are various stages of development. And none of those developmental stages mark the beginning of a new life. Only conception marks the beginning of a new life. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
We genuinely believe that life starts at conception because it is an objective, indisputable fact that life starts at conception. It is the definitive moment at which a new life—which did not previously exist—begins to exist. — PolitiTweet.org
Chris Hayes @chrislhayes
I've said this before and will say it again. The movement that drives abortion policy in the GOP genuinely believes… https://t.co/c9aM96lKau
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
RT @LiveAction: .@LilaGraceRose powerfully responds to abortion advocate on @DrPhil: "Laws are meant to protect the weak. Who is the weake… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
RT @stclairashley: Libs of TikTok ROASTS Taylor Lorenz https://t.co/ItVbG22ScN — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
Seth Dillon DESTROYS Ben Shapiro with facts and logic. https://t.co/Phh4GObVkk — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
RT @ChristinaPushaw: “Hi Chaya, I am writing my 18th article in the Washington Post accusing you of terrorism! Do you have a comment on why… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
RT @conservmillen: “How did we get here?” can be answered just as accurately by pointing to the right’s cowardice as it can by pointing to… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
Hey @Forbes, why don’t you show us where Libs of Tiktok claimed that “most surgeons” perform gender-affirming surgeries on minors? — PolitiTweet.org
Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok
“Minors aren’t getting “gender affirming” surgery except for when they are.” Just incredible journalism https://t.co/u9UtRuomVX
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
RT @wokal_distance: My threads about defining and naming wokeness was just featured on @Not_the_Bee!!! This is very cool 😀 https://t.co/Y… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
@Cmcjjpp He strongly objected to characterizing miracles as “violations” of natural laws. He described them as new events that were fed into the natural system from the outside from a supernatural source. The natural laws accommodate those new events; they do not preclude or prevent them. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
@Cmcjjpp He strongly objected to characterizing miracles of “violations” of natural laws. He described them as new events that were fed into the natural system from the outside from a supernatural source. The natural laws accommodate those new events; they do not preclude or prevent them. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
The rigid regularity of natural laws is what makes it possible to identify a miracle. Without rules, we could never notice exceptions. So, far from precluding miracles, the laws of nature are what make it possible for us to perceive and believe in them. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
Science studies nature and its laws. The laws of nature describe what will happen naturally, in the absence of supernatural intervention. The events you referenced are examples of supernatural intervention. They’re not “inconsistent” with science; they just aren’t natural. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
@MattWalshBlog Mentioning this is terrorism. What’s it like being no better than ISIS? — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
@Soteriology101 Amen. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
Fact check: True. — PolitiTweet.org
Luna M @lunam62
@SethDillon When a Palm Beach Post reporter called Dillon on April 22 to discuss his social-media strategy and his… https://t.co/Qekj2gr1tX
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
@lacasse_rol I did not say that anyone who can identify as a woman is a woman. And it does not follow that if everyone could identify as a woman that everyone would. That’s ridiculous. In fact, everyone can, based on their definition. And their definition is insane, stupid, circular, etc. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
@lacasse_rol No there aren’t. They define woman as anyone who identifies as a woman. There are no barriers other than self-identification. And that renders the term completely meaningless. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
It justifies lethal force if there’s a threat of imminent death or great bodily harm. A baby presents no such threat. The whole point is that abortion is *not*, in fact, self-defense. — PolitiTweet.org
Glau @GlauSciathan
@SethDillon So... You don't think self-defense justifies lethal force. Interesting. I look forward to your analysis on gun law. /s
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
If you’re singing about how invincible and unstoppable you are, I’m going to assume you break down and cry daily. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
.@TaylorLorenz just confessed. https://t.co/8YxgdDRHTn — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
@lacasse_rol The fact that anyone does at all is what makes the word meaningless. If I say anything I refer to as a pencil actually is a pencil, then the word "pencil" instantly loses its meaning; it no longer refers to a specific object. My use of that term no longer conveys information. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
This is obviously absurd. But it's even worse when you consider that already-born children are actually—not just potentially—burdensome. If we apply the reasoning that's used to justify abortion to toddlers and teens, then we should be able to kill them in self-defense, too. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
Pro-abortion arguments are primarily self-defense arguments. The baby is viewed as a threat to one's freedom, both physical and financial. And that potential for harm is what's supposed to justify lethal action. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
@lacasse_rol I didn't say that everyone identifies as female. That's your straw man. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
The future is here. https://t.co/tm46L5ihuI — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
If being female has nothing to do with your biology—if it's just an identity—then what are you even identifying as? If anyone can belong to the category "female," then the term is utterly meaningless. It's just a synonym for "miscellaneous." Never stop mocking this nonsense. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Dillon @SethDillon
If you can identify as female—i.e., if you can identify as having physical characteristics that you do not, in fact, have—then you can identify as anything. A white person can identify as black. A short person can identify as tall. An idiot, like Matt here, can identify as smart. — PolitiTweet.org
Matt Hoh for Senate @MatthewPHoh
For all the people demanding an answer as to what a woman is: A woman is a person who identifies as an adult female… https://t.co/qOlUIo43RM
