Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet interface.

Showing page 82 of 211.

Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

Read my full report in City Journal: https://t.co/1HuijNbdB7 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022 Deleted after 12 seconds
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

In sum, San Francisco Unified has created what @LeorSapir has called a "a school-to-clinic pipeline," beginning in elementary school with secret child sexual transitions and concluding in middle and high school with referrals to "gender-affirming" medical treatments. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

In middle school, San Francisco Unified begins promoting a program called "Q Groups," which is designed to "connect students to mental health professionals and clinics that offer gender-affirming health services," such as puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and gender surgery. https://t.co/svgsikph9m — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

According to district policy, parents do not have the right to opt-out of the lessons on "gender identity" and "sexual orientation," which are incorporated into the curriculum for English, social studies, arts, and other subjects. https://t.co/S2nM1jUpwv — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

The district's policy is to facilitate child sexual transitions without notifying parents. "[Students] have the right to be 'out' at school, and to not have that information that they are 'out'—with new pronouns, with a new identity—in any way shared with those folks at home." https://t.co/vzO38DqeSJ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

The district has created a system for facilitating child sexual transitions for its K-5 students, telling children that they may choose a different name and set of pronouns than the ones they use at home, and that this new identity will be kept secret from their parents. https://t.co/TpnRjCZTJA — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

The district also released a guide on "affirm[ing]" students who use "it" pronouns, explaining that it "has a long history being used as a slur to dehumanize trans and gender non-conforming folks," but can be "reclaimed," as African-Americans have done with the "n-word." https://t.co/nSzUQ1fqCa — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

The district teaches students that they can diverge from from "vanilla sexuality" and become part of the "bisexual umbrella," with sexual identity options including "fluid," "pansexual," "omnisexual," "homo-curious," and "hetero-flexible." https://t.co/FiMNrmMXWV — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

According to documents I've obtained from a whistleblower, the district has implemented a radical gender theory curriculum and celebrated "International Pronouns Day," teaching students that they can adopt a wide range of genders and sexual identities. https://t.co/1yQH1Tg3lZ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

SCOOP: San Francisco Unified School District has released a guidebook encouraging teachers to facilitate secret child sexual transitions and to affirm students who use the gender pronoun "it" at school—which, the district says, is the gender-identity version of the "n-word." 🧵 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

@wil_da_beast630 Yup, exactly. Parents are objecting to books that contain pornographic/sexually explicit content and are being *promoted to children.* That's it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

RT @SwipeWright: The public wishing to remove some books they believe to be age inappropriate from public elementary school libraries they… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022 Retweet
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

@janecoaston The whole thread was a discussion about books in public schools and libraries for *children.* And I didn't say "stocking," I said "features," which are not the same. You're free to disagree—and to say "Gender Queer" is good for kids—but honesty would be a good starting point. https://t.co/VZtMksPsPv — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

@janecoaston The whole thread was a discussion about books in public schools and libraries for *children.* And I didn't say "stocking," I said "featuring," which are not the same. You're free to disagree with my point, but a little honesty would be a good starting point. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022 Deleted after 25 seconds
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

@cvaldary I'm also talking about public institutions, which are chartered by and ultimately subject to the regulation of voters through the legislative process. The critical race theorists want to regulate the *private speech of individuals.* Big difference on both counts. Not comparable. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

@cvaldary (Additionally, the CRTists want to regulate the private speech of individuals. I'm suggesting that public institutions that have compulsory power over minors are ultimately subject to regulation by voters through the democratic process. Completely different standard.) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022 Deleted after 58 seconds
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

@cvaldary No, I'm qualifying it in an important way: I'm talking about *children.* You don't think children's libraries should feature copies of Hustler, Mein Kampf, and the NAMBLA newsletter, do you? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

@cvaldary No, I'm qualifying it in an important way: I'm talking about *children.* You don't think children's libraries should feature copies of Hustler, Kein Kampf, and the NAMBLA newsletter, do you? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2022 Deleted after a minute Just a Typo
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

RT @1776ProjectPac: We won 15 school board races in Texas. Then we won 35 races in Florida, flipping 5 counties from liberal to conservati… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 28, 2022 Retweet
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

@martyrmade No way. Would rather work a digital job and purchase food from the farmers. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 28, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

@janecoaston Do you believe public children's libraries should purchase and feature copies of Hustler, Mein Kampf, and the NAMBLA newsletter? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 28, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

RT @Heminator: See my essay "In Defense of Book Banning" on this exact topic -- making decisions about what goes on finite shelf space in p… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 28, 2022 Retweet
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

RT @Amb8819: @realchrisrufo Sowell talks about this in the vision of the Anointed, it’s not censorship if a public library refuses to buy… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 28, 2022 Retweet
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

These books are so "banned," they have their own section at Barnes & Noble. https://t.co/2qjMaTY9hO — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 28, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

There are no "book bans" in America. Authors have a First Amendment right to publish whatever they want, but public libraries and schools are not obligated to subsidize them. Voters get to decide which texts—and ultimately, which values—public institutions transmit to children. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 28, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

@brad_polumbo @kittypurrzog I take the opposite position: symbolic fights are extremely important. It's important to set boundaries within formative institutions—schools, libraries—and then extend protections to society at large, i.e., legislation that makes it harder for minors to access porn online. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 28, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

@brad_polumbo @kittypurrzog "Kids have phones, so the library might as well include lightly pornographic titles" is the same line of reasoning as "kids have access to drug dealers in school, so the principal might as well give them OxyContin." Social approval matters; adults must provide good boundaries. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 28, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

@brad_polumbo @kittypurrzog In a democracy, the voters who fund public institutions get to decide which values those institutions transmit to children. If a public library features Gender Queer (or Mein Kampf), it's an endorsement. And excluding those books is not a "ban"—they're widely available elsewhere. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 28, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

@kittypurrzog Should public children's libraries should include copies of Hustler, Mein Kampf, and the NAMBLA newsletter on their shelves? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 28, 2022
Profile Image

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @realchrisrufo

@SwipeWright This whole thing is bonkers. I think part of it is the "labcoat effect": doctors can launder their personal kinks through a medical journal and they're golden. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 28, 2022