jeremy scahill

Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet interface.

Showing page 313 of 326.

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@ishaantharoor There would be no civilians killed in numerous wedding parties if the US didn't bomb them. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@stephsc44 Irrelevant what I think when discussing constitutional rights. How did I drop the ball exactly? Point out what is inaccurate. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@stephsc44 I didn't write the 1st amendment but it protects racist and bigoted speech. Is there an update of it I m… https://t.co/a9VaWd3YRx — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@selfagency @RealAlexJones Oh I've seen him do this for years. Was joking with you — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@jon__harrington Under the 1st amendment they do (when it comes to racist or bigoted speech). That was my point. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@rxcdk Thanks. Twitter can be a very horrible place for trying to make any nuanced points. Out of context, I would… https://t.co/jtEKa1PCWI — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@GerryGonzalo Haha. So funny that you told me no one cares what I think and then reply to my thoughts. You're a clown. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@GerryGonzalo Yet here you are writing me — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@naijaman Let me get this straight: it is not allowed to discuss what the 1st amendment says? How is that productive? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@GerryGonzalo Thanks for reading my feed. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@rxcdk All day alt right types and racists have been promoting false notion that 1st amendment means no consequences for your racist speech — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@rxcdk only one issue here: is that what the first amendment says? I am not the 1st amendment. The point was respon… https://t.co/FZpYlEobrB — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@rxcdk I have never viewed racism solely from a legal view. Check my work. But the context was about 1st amendment, what it says and doesn't — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@GerryGonzalo And yet here you are reading what I am saying. Dumb ass. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@MichaelEHuck @rxcdk It is if you don't look at the context, take it in isolation and impose your own interpretatio… https://t.co/KD6Oewq9nK — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@rxcdk I was referring to indisputable 1st amendment rights If you look at the context. Also see the preceding tweet. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@DCgadfly @theintercept I'm not defending it. The 1st amendment is. Which is what I was discussing. But have fun lying. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@DCgadfly @theintercept Try reading the entire context. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@queersocialism Yes. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@queersocialism Absolutely the law is selectively applied in racist ways all the time. And has been from the beginning. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@queersocialism No. The context is literally explaining what the first amendment protects and doesn't. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@Tigershah26 No. We are explaining the first amendment. And how it doesn't protect you from consequences of your racist speech. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@queersocialism A lot of "alt-right" commenters seem to think the 1st amendment means you can't be fired for saying racist shit. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@queersocialism Specifically, I was citing that that speech is protected by law. But that doesn't immunize you from… https://t.co/FQWlOrP9Fc — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@queersocialism Yes. I am talking about the 1st amendment and the law. A lot of people seem to think you have a rig… https://t.co/cxKJdkB0m8 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@scenicdriver @pjfleischer Yep. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@selfagency @RealAlexJones This is making me very uncomfortable, Daniel. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

RT @andylassner: @jeremyscahill @RealAlexJones Lol. Alex had to apologize to yogurt two weeks ago. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2017 Retweet Hibernated

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@crobmatthews Lol. Ok — PolitiTweet.org