Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 129 of 326.
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
RT @AndrewDFish: Presidential spokesman for @jairbolsonaro said the president will not comment on our reporting that reveals serious ethica… — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
@ChuckGrassley @realDonaldTrump go. off. king. — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
This is an absolute bombshell reporting series out of the @TheInterceptBr — PolitiTweet.org
Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald
3/ We also published an article with numerous encrypted chats from the anti-corruption Car Wash prosecutors proving… https://t.co/U5CHGUOnUH
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
RT @theintercept: An archive provided to The Intercept by an anonymous source includes years of private conversations from the prosecutoria… — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
RT @AndrewDFish: This is by far the most important story @theinterceptbr has ever published. The political implications in Brazil are simpl… — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
Secret Brazil Archive: Exclusive: Leaked chats between Brazilian judge and prosecutor who imprisoned Lula reveal prohibited collaboration and doubts over evidence https://t.co/Bohu50fAmx by @AndrewDFish, @rafaelmmartins, @demori, @alexdesanti, @ggreenwald — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
Secret Brazil Archive: Brazil’s top prosecutors who indicted Lula schemed in secret messages to prevent his party from winning 2018 election https://t.co/o38oteDMk1 by @ggreenwald, @vpougy — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
RT @Ali_Gharib: In 2018, in response to WaPo, the White House cited a Forbes article by pro-MEK activist Heshmat Alavi. There's a rub: “H… — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
RT @theintercept: The Chinese government appears to have launched a major new internet crackdown, blocking the country’s citizens from acce… — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
RT @MazMHussain: Hello, I have a story about that shows the extent to which the debate over Iran policy has been turned into a snake pit of… — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
RT @jsoohen: Review: ‘16 Shots’ a gripping and vital account of the killing of teen Laquan McDonald - Los Angeles Times https://t.co/vo9cBa… — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
RT @FreedomofPress: Today is day *84* of Chelsea Manning's detention for refusing to comply with a grand jury investigation of WikiLeaks. J… — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
New @intercepted: Historian Johanna Schoen on the effort to abolish abortion rights, #RealityWinner's mom @bjwinnerdavis makes the case for why Reality should be freed. Lessons from the Yugoslav Partizans from philosopher @HorvatSrecko https://t.co/HOo0jhZuGJ — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
New @intercepted podcast: Criminalizing freedom — the attacks on abortion rights and free speech in the age of Trump https://t.co/HOo0jhZuGJ — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
@bambamhaupt This "article" is about the one count indictment in April. We are discussing the superseding indictments--17 Espionage Act charges. Try reading those and then come tell me it isn't a grave threat to freedom of speech and freedom of the press. — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
@erichme Did the Trump DoJ give you a bunch of Trump steaks to send this tweet? — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
@bambamhaupt Do you support prosecuting Julian Assange with 17 counts under the Espionage Act for the 2010 Wikileaks publications about US war crimes? Yes or no? Have you researched the implications of this prosecution on freedom of speech? Yes or No? — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
You may think the prosecution of Julian Assange doesn't impact you, but it is, in reality, an attack on your freedom of speech. https://t.co/eJjnMokRnX — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
@oshkamaloshka I can't help you with the serious comprehension issues you seem to have. Have a good day. — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
@JSchwi You read the 17 Espionage charges? No, you did not. That is a narrow charge you are citing that is a computer crime. Read the superseding indictment. That is what we are discussing here. — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
@oshkamaloshka You are truly ignorant of the implications of this prosecution on free speech in general. Feel free to die on that hill of ignorance. — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
@oshkamaloshka This has extreme consequences for all journalists. As a legal matter, it doesn't matter if Assange is a journalist (who determines that? You? The government?). Perhaps you need to do a tiny bit of research on the Espionage Act and 1st Amendment. — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
@oshkamaloshka totally irrelevant to the espionage charges whether he is a journalist or not. — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
@DDIFreeman Do you support prosecuting Julian Assange under the Espionage Act as a publisher? All of the charges relate to the Iraq and Afghan war documents and videos and the State Department cables leaked by Manning. You support that prosecution? — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
@JSchwi you don't seem to understand the actual charges and the history of the law he is being prosecuted under. Perhaps read the indictment before taking a position that says he deserves to be prosecuted for Espionage. — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
@JSchwi what point did you think were you making to me that I have not made in this video or many many many times before? And no, this prosecution should absolutely not happen on the charges he currently faces in the US. — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
@DDIFreeman Please show me the US indictment for "working with a hostile power to release state secrets in an attempt to swing an election" or rape. This is about the Espionage Act. Perhaps do some research before getting on social media to spout nonsense. — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
@JSchwi you clearly decided to write this without bothering to watch what you pretend to be commenting about. — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
The prosecution of Julian Assange is an attack on our freedom of speech. https://t.co/eJjnMokRnX` — PolitiTweet.org
jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill
RT @JameelJaffer: Wait, what? The problem wasn't that Barr used the word "spying," but that he suggested--without evidence--that the spying… — PolitiTweet.org