Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 63 of 181.
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
“Based upon the evidence, I do not believe the President has committed any high crimes or misdemeanors…” https://t.co/xOUfFJQaOc — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
Here are my remarks on impeachment: https://t.co/locbXPzgL6 — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
https://t.co/p0Xp0J6JlD — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
I recently spoke on the House floor to congratulate my alma mater, the LaSalle Lancers for winning the Ohio Division II State Football Championship! I also commended the Elder Panthers, who came up just short in their Division I championship run. https://t.co/AJOM26fIkN — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
Thank you to everyone who participated in the Tele-Town Hall tonight. We discussed impeachment and how we can move forward as a nation. https://t.co/hchl4yRO7K — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
If you have some time today, please read my take on “Why Impeachment Is Different This Time Around”: https://t.co/0ectYysTLQ — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
Earlier this week, I talked to @DanaBashCNN about impeachment then and now. Watch the footage here: https://t.co/vQS12aQHEY https://t.co/0KDv99Pqew — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
https://t.co/ixlV4hI5Vs — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
RT @CNNPolitics: Rep. Steve Chabot calls the impeachment inquiry "the most tragic mockery of justice in the history of this nation" https:/… — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
RT @RandyLudlow: Ohio's @RepSteveChabot of Cincinnati denounces "travesty of justice" in impeachment of @realDonaldTrump, born out of Dem's… — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
RT @CBSNews: Rep. Steve Chabot says the bar for impeachment is being lowered: "In the near future, when you have a president and you have a… — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
Let’s do our jobs as Members of this Committee and thoroughly investigate these allegations to get to the bottom of what happened. Justice, history and the American people deserve at least that much. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
. @RepJerryNadler we’ve served on this Committee and even as Chairman and Ranking Member alongside each other. If nothing more, I ask that you, at a minimum, take the time to bring fact witnesses to testify about the alleged quid pro quo. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
What Democrats are doing today is a travesty in which they are setting the standard for future Administrations. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
The majority really should hold themselves in contempt for conducting this one-sided biased impeachment investigation, and then attacking the White House for refusing to participate in such a patently unfair process. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
You want to talk about an abuse of power? What the House Democrats are doing here is a clear case of abusing their office for political gain. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
When Congress disagrees with a particular assertion of executive privilege, the remedy is not impeachment. The remedy is to go to court, and let the third branch of government decide who is correct. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
Executive privilege is a time-honored, constitutionally protected right of each and every Administration. And it has been asserted time and time again, by Administration after Administration. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
Let me make this clear — asserting executive privilege is not, in any way, shape or form, obstruction. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
The second Article of Impeachment is nearly as ridiculous as the first. An obstruction charge requires a concerted effort to interfere with or impede a Congressional investigation. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
https://t.co/xVqcSGOa6O — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
But that effort was abandoned because she knows, most Members of Congress know, and now the American people know, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐲 𝐰𝐚𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐚 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
I guess we now know why Nancy Pelosi was focus-grouping bribery as a potential charge. Because she was desperately searching for a crime to justify this 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐦 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
.@HouseDemocrats If that’s the best you’ve got, you wasted a whole lot of time and taxpayer dollars, all because the leftist, Democrat base hates this President. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
Let me put it another way — the entire argument for impeachment is based on a charge that is not a crime (much less a high crime) and that has NEVER been approved by the House of Representatives in a Presidential Impeachment. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
In the Nixon and Clinton impeachments, abuse of power was a tacked-on charge, far less important in those cases than the actual high crimes charged against both men. Here, it’s the main thrust of the House Democrats’ entire case. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
There is another significant difference between the abuse of power charges against Nixon and Clinton, and those presented here. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
Based on the actual facts of this case (as opposed to the hearsay and innuendo compiled by the Intelligence Committee), it doesn’t appear that an abuse of power even took place, and there certainly isn’t enough evidence to support an article of impeachment. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
Fourth, despite all the efforts to establish evidence of a quid pro quo by House Democrats, Ukraine did nothing to assure the release of the aid. There was no public announcement of an investigation. In fact, it doesn’t appear that the investigation was even opened. — PolitiTweet.org
Archive: Rep. Steve Chabot @RepSteveChabot
Third, Ukraine actually received the aid after the President was satisfied that Ukraine had taken meaningful steps to address corruption. Which, again, is an obligation required by law. — PolitiTweet.org
