Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 94 of 1290.
Daniel Dale @ddale8
Ban on 24hr/drivethru voting. No morning voting on souls-polls Sunday. New hoops for the disabled + ppl helping. New ID rule. New felonies for elex officials. More power to pollwatchers. More early-vote hours in some counties. Easier to overturn elections. https://t.co/RhZRGoVbVi — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
RT @AC360: The pastor preaching lies about Covid-19 and vaccines and the family grieving the loss of the loved one that went to his church… — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
I broke down 20 key provisions of Texas Republicans’ elections bill. Reading the text was educational for me, so perhaps you will find the article informative. https://t.co/hXyLJPjXKN — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
RT @NikkiMcR: Tucker Carlson falsely claims Joe Biden called white Republican men "more dangerous than ISIS" Biden actually said: "Terrori… — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
RT @jaketapper: @JoshMandelOhio @CNN I un-RTed it so as to redo it with a line explaining to people who you are. Everything else you wrote… — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
My God — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
Blazers-Nuggets is outrageous — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
@ekoreen I kinda admire the ingenuity of the cop-out — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
@andrew_rudick Understood, and I appreciate your civility! — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
@andrew_rudick I don’t want to get in an argument about this; there are so many ways to slice voting data that firm conclusions aren’t wise, and Biden’s claim was so vague. But Manchin’s own self-serving slicing, used to sell himself to a conservative state, certainly aren’t some Gotcha proof — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
@andrew_rudick Because I’m right. His self-data on how often he voted with the majority of GOP includes a very large number of votes where he also voted with the majority of Democrats; see example below. He has not voted more often with a GOP majority alone than he has with a Dem majority alone https://t.co/hj9ctRSGfG — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
Here’s Biden’s public schedule for tomorrow. (Public schedules don’t include all of a president’s activities.) https://t.co/G90ioUwaWU — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
@jamesonstarship That’s a weird read of my tweet. A bunch of pundits and some reporters immediately said Biden was wrong. I made clear that there’s another interpretation of his comments in which he’s right. — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
When I see ambiguity in Biden remarks, rather than proclaiming ‘em false, I get people yelling at me for supposed softness. But I spent SO much time in the Trump era asking experts if there was any possible alternative way to read remarks people were calling wrong. It’s the job. — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
If Biden meant they “vote more with my Republican friends” *than they do with Democrats,* he was wrong. If he meant they “vote more with my Republican friends” *than other Democrats do,* he was right. (One Trump-era measure here: https://t.co/R0FAIxNCgS) He didn’t specify. — PolitiTweet.org
Manu Raju @mkraju
Biden says he has “two members of the Senate who vote more with my Republican friends,” he says, presumably referri… https://t.co/AXZTa5UgUF
Daniel Dale @ddale8
Good piece on the photo that The Daily Mail and others have wrongly claimed is of David Chipman, Biden's nominee to run the ATF. https://t.co/knAvMzdfhz — PolitiTweet.org
PolitiFact @PolitiFact
False. A slew of articles and social media posts say ATF chief nominee David Chipman was part of the 1993 federal a… https://t.co/2prDJBdq3U
Daniel Dale @ddale8
Here’s Biden’s public schedule for tomorrow. (Public schedules don’t include all of a president’s activities.) https://t.co/uGdrhM93KW — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
@WPaulJones2 If you think it's "splitting hairs" to say that the provision that is being described by lots of people as a ban is not a ban at all, then you're followin' the wrong dude — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
@brooklyncybele Correct. — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
@NickZazulia Of course, agree, would never claim 100% objectivity - there are biases and moral questions in all kinds of journalism. But a quick fact check of a legislative provision that is being described inaccurately is, clearly, never an endorsement of the provision, or something — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
I'll try to make it as simple as possible. The new bill says the fill-out-a-form requirement applies to people driving 3 or more non-relatives who are "voting under this section." What is "this section"? Pull up existing law: "Sec. 64.009. VOTER UNABLE TO ENTER POLLING PLACE." https://t.co/1LTnXOZyMa — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
@Merz This is so incorrect that I'm gonna stop engaging. I explained precisely why the Ornstein tweet was wrong and precisely what the bill actually says. That's my job. — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
Fact checks don't take moral stands, friends. A bunch of people are incorrectly describing this provision, and I'm helping people correctly understand what the provision says. You can castigate the actual language all you like. https://t.co/LSIgFXXszw — PolitiTweet.org
Alex Merz @Merz
@ddale8 It says that people associating and traveling together for a legal purpose must register with the governmen… https://t.co/E1h3HkjW70
Daniel Dale @ddale8
No, I'm correct. The language in the bill limits the restriction to people driving non-relatives "voting under this section." Legislation is complicated, but "this section" is a *section about people physically incapable of voting inside the building.* https://t.co/ZRbzsiyHUt https://t.co/5yxzNo7ceR — PolitiTweet.org
Michael Wright @michaelwright50
@ddale8 This is incorrect. There is no language limiting it to driving sick or disabled voters.
Daniel Dale @ddale8
There is lots of criticism of the fill-a-form requirement for drivers doing a good deed. But a) it's not a ban of any kind, and b) it doesn't apply to people driving voters going inside to vote; it's limited to people transporting disabled or sick voters who are voting outside. — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
The bill does not make it “illegal” to drive more than 2 non-relatives. It says people driving more than 2 disabled or sick non-relatives - people allowed to have a ballot brought to them at the curb to fill out in the car - have to *fill out a form* with their name and address. — PolitiTweet.org
Norman Ornstein @NormOrnstein
The outrageous, BS provision in the Texas bill that makes it illegal to transport more than 2 non-relatives to poll… https://t.co/ByFBIOFnz5
Daniel Dale @ddale8
@KFILE Nope — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
@KFILE Kenny: “Chuck, who do you think did it?” Charles: “Jim Ross. I mean Bob Ross. I’m going with Bob Ross. Ross Geller.” Shaq: “How many episodes you watch, Chuck?” Charles: “Man I don’t got time to watch all these mysterious shows.” — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
Here’s Biden’s public schedule for tomorrow. (Public schedules don’t include all of a president’s activities.) https://t.co/FIMlEJ37o0 — PolitiTweet.org
Daniel Dale @ddale8
RT @JoeUscinski: This is important, because the conspiracy theories that QAnon adopted (e.g., deep state, Satanists, elite sex traffickers)… — PolitiTweet.org
