Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 96 of 315.
David Gauke @DavidGauke
@RoryStewartUK A good and insightful summary. https://t.co/lkBVbhOAF0 — PolitiTweet.org
Kieron Bryan @kieronjbryan
š to this England fan for the best vox pop answer today #ItsComingHome #great https://t.co/UnroGO3Tn0
David Gauke @DavidGauke
@RoryStewartUK The boys done great, Rory. — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
@JudithFreedman Youāre probably right. But the last two years havenāt stopped Emma Raducanu! — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
Tremendous. — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
@timfarron Itās a funny old game, Stewie. A funny old game. — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
@RoryStewartUK Itās all about pockets of space. https://t.co/QgfZ5HCIM7 — PolitiTweet.org
Michael Spicer @MrMichaelSpicer
the pundit who says āpockets of spaceā but doesnāt know what it means https://t.co/av3sORQCeo
David Gauke @DavidGauke
RT @gabrielclarke05: ā¦@masonmount_10ā© returns , ā¦@Sanchooo10ā© starts as ā¦@Englandā© make two changes and go back to back four in Rome ā¦@itvfā¦ — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
The way Ally McCoist says ātremendousā is tremendous. — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
How many other parents feel compelled to discuss with their 18 year old child whether theyāre achieving all that they might with their post A-level summer? āNo, getting up before lunch is not impressive. Getting to the 2nd week of #Wimbledon is impressiveā. #Raducanu — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
Read the whole thread on the NI Protocol. But Iām sure the answer is 1ļøā£. — PolitiTweet.org
Dr Anna Jerzewska @AnnaJerzewska
I see 2 options here: 1ā£ UK Gov knew, didn't accept and hoped it can try to renegotiate/bend afterwards or 2ā£ UKā¦ https://t.co/LY0i195yxs
David Gauke @DavidGauke
RT @NewStatesman: Reducing carbon emissions is not about jobs and growth and it will not be cost-free, writes @DavidGauke. https://t.co/VeKā¦ — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
RT @DavidHenigUK: Oh look, UK government ministers once again inciting divisions in Northern Ireland in preference to admitting what they sā¦ — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
Don't let anyone tell you that Germans lack a sense of humour. — PolitiTweet.org
Adam Bienkov @AdamBienkov
Asked to sum up how she feels about Boris Johnson as a person, Angela Merkel replies: "We look at each other, we loā¦ https://t.co/fKO8kwXnnY
David Gauke @DavidGauke
As I was saying yesterday.... https://t.co/GTYNzt6fth — PolitiTweet.org
David Higham @oldtrotter
Sure show me an example of trying to tackle climate change without voters facing any costs or changing behaviour. https://t.co/kZaqQvabaZ
David Gauke @DavidGauke
RT @DavidGauke: Politicians of all stripes argue that taking steps to reduce carbon emissions will be good for jobs and growth. Sadly, takeā¦ — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
RT @MikeHolden42: @DavidGauke https://t.co/yjisS5XcNZ — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
RT @TheDaliMale: @DavidGauke Moved to nearby Bradford https://t.co/nxiQ6yFsAy — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
@Dieter_Helm It's an excellent read - and makes a powerful case. — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
RT @jhawksworth5: Good article by @DavidGauke - there are strong arguments for decarbonisation but there will inevitably be some economic cā¦ — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
Politicians of all stripes argue that taking steps to reduce carbon emissions will be good for jobs and growth. Sadā¦ https://t.co/EudZM6Q2Vd
David Gauke @DavidGauke
Does Four Seasons Total Landscaping have a shop in Batley? — PolitiTweet.org
The Telegraph @Telegraph
It was a disappointing night for George Galloway - he came third behind the Tories and Labour Here's his reactionā¦ https://t.co/8e77gHp4FP
David Gauke @DavidGauke
My piece for @newstatesman on why lowering carbon emissions isn't about 'growth and jobs', no matter what many politicians claim. https://t.co/GTYNzt6fth — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
RT @DavidGauke: Reducing carbon emissions is not about jobs and growth and it will not be cost-free. Wishful thinking and boosterism wonātā¦ — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
@emmamrevell Many thanks. — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
Reducing carbon emissions is not about jobs and growth and it will not be cost-free. Wishful thinking and boosterism wonāt be enough to control climate change; it will be necessary to risk some honesty with the public. https://t.co/GTYNzt6fth — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
But it's not an approach that will survive contact with reality. Either governments will avoid the hard choices, in which case we're simply not going to meet the net zero target, or an unsuspecting public will revolt when confronted with the costs. — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
It is not surprising that politicians do not want to confront the public with the consequences of pursuing bold targets ā much better to maintain support by highlighting the opportunities and downplaying the difficulties. — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
This would result in higher costs for consumers - that's the point. This would incentivise a switch to lower carbon lifestyles. If we're not prepared to do that, hard/impossible to see how we get to net zero. — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
If we're really serious about controlling climate change, we should focus on carbon consumption not carbon production (as @Dieter_Helm argues in his book 'Net Zero') which requires a carbon tax + a carbon border adjustment mechanism. — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
That's not to say that these costs aren't worth paying (the scientific and economic consensus is that they are worth paying) but they are costs nonetheless. Kidding ourselves otherwise will just undermine trust & result in inefficient ways of reducing carbon emissions. — PolitiTweet.org
David Gauke @DavidGauke
Reducing carbon emissions will be good news for some businesses and for some people but, in terms of the wider economy, the new jobs created are a cost, not a benefit, and will have to be paid for by taxpayers or consumers. — PolitiTweet.org
