Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 79 of 756.
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
RT @RepTedLieu: Any MAGA Republican who argues that highly sensitive documents about human intelligence sources should be declassified and… — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@IMHO1969 If it’s not nuclear related information, then a current President may declassify documents, but not a former President. There is a process of declassification because, for example, if docs are going to reveal U.S. spies, then steps first need to be taken to protect our people. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
Why does the U.S. require a process for a President to declassify documents? Because if that person is going to do something as insane as declassify current documents on U.S. human intelligence sources, then our agencies need to take steps to protect Americans from being killed. — PolitiTweet.org
Morning Joe @Morning_Joe
Classified Material on Human Intelligence Sources Helped Trigger Alarm https://t.co/ZPkCVAga8h
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@rehmann_l I’m not jumping to any conclusions. I’m simply repeating what MAGA Republicans are saying. They’re saying all the highly classified documents that Trump took are now somehow magically declassified. Which means you can read them, and so can your neighbor and the Russians. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
Your reminder that MAGA Republicans argue our nation’s most closely guarded secrets should be declassified and on the front pages of the Washington Post. Even if those documents could cause massive harm to U.S. national security and get Americans killed. Just to protect Trump. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard W. Painter @RWPUSA
Around the globe people who gave us information vital to our national security may be killed because Trump compromi… https://t.co/L7aN3niNMu
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
Democrats are expanding our lead in the polls. We can hold the House. You can help by donating to my leadership PAC which supports federal candidates. You’ll also get a super cool water bottle that I designed. Donate here: https://t.co/GXJzMCYQ1p #mondaymotivation — PolitiTweet.org
Morning Consult @MorningConsult
Ahead of the 2022 #midterms, 47% of voters are most likely to vote for a Democratic candidate for Congress, compare… https://t.co/kxoMdOpFUn
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
RT @Annette_Taddeo: Democrats have passed bills to help w/ pocketbook issues, reduce inflation, and lower costs. Republicans like @MaElvir… — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
Why are Democrats ahead in multiple generic congressional ballots? Because Dems put #PeopleOverPolitics and are focused on lower costs, better-paying jobs and safer communities. What are MAGA Republicans focused on? Ending Social Security as we know it. #sundayvibes — PolitiTweet.org
Sahil Kapur @sahilkapur
NEW: Social Security politics are back as GOP candidates grab the “third rail” in 2022 races Blake Masters propose… https://t.co/OsEb32K69k
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@mommysnewsskirt The post was about making highly classified documents that would put US personnel at risk available to the general public just because MAGA folks want to protect Trump. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@MagBruin The Affadavit that described the documents was filed under penalty of perjury. That is not fake news. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
Any MAGA Republican who argues that highly sensitive, U.S. national security human intelligence sources documents should be declassified and publicly available in order to protect Trump from prosecution, is making a traitorous argument. There’s really no other way to say it. — PolitiTweet.org
The New York Times @nytimes
Breaking News: The Justice Department cited documents that could compromise human intelligence sources in its reque… https://t.co/Vx2S6ouv87
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@MichaelKrause6 @MickMulvaney False — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@thebarrysage @MickMulvaney The Inspector General found that the emails were not properly marked as classified and Hillary did not know they were classified. That is different from Trump intentionally taking documents he knew were classified. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@DanOhh1970 @MickMulvaney The Inspector General found that the emails were not properly marked as classified and Hillary did not know they were classified. That is different from Trump intentionally taking documents he knew were classified. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@MagBruin @MickMulvaney Thank you for following me. I don’t expect Mick to answer me because he won’t be able to come up with a good response. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@crack_biden @MickMulvaney The Inspector General found that the emails were not properly marked as classified and Hillary did not know they were classified. That is different from Trump intentionally taking documents he knew were classified. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@BigelowOaks @MickMulvaney The Inspector General found that the emails were not properly marked as classified and Hillary did not know they were classified. That is different from Trump intentionally taking documents he knew were classified. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@GottaAsk2 @MickMulvaney The Inspector General found that the emails were not properly marked as classified and Hillary did not know they were classified. That is different from Trump intentionally taking documents he knew were classified. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@zach_baylor @MickMulvaney The Inspector General found that the emails were not properly marked as classified and Hillary did not know they were classified. That is different from Trump intentionally taking documents he knew were classified. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@johnnybgood36 @MickMulvaney Trump is not POTUS. He is a former President with no security clearance. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@silveradolord80 @MickMulvaney The Inspector General found that the emails were not properly marked as classified and Hillary did not know they were classified. That is different from Trump intentionally taking documents he knew were classified. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
MAGA Republicans argue that highly classified documents Trump took to Mar-a-Lago about human intelligence sources should be declassified and available to the general public (and as a result also available to adversaries like Iran and Russia). That is cultish, traitorous behavior. — PolitiTweet.org
Maggie Haberman @maggieNYT
Documents related to human intelligence sources were found at Mar-a-Lago. That helped trigger alarm among DOJ offic… https://t.co/N9irztBJcs
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@Sintamyr @MickMulvaney There is no way Trump followed the declassification process. There’s no evidence of it. And even if he did follow the process, then he is a traitor because he would be making our nation’s most sensitive secrets available to you, your neighbor, the media and the Russians. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
Dear @MickMulvaney: A federal employee went to prison earlier this year for taking classified SECRET “documents” to her hotel room. Yep, it was just about documents and she went to prison. https://t.co/QejLO2DOLY Our nation takes classified information seriously. Why don’t you? — PolitiTweet.org
Mick Mulvaney @MickMulvaney
It appears this raid was, in fact, just about documents. As even some on the left have opined: that is simply outrageous.
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@troypallotto Actually, from the Affidavit we do have some idea of what he had. And it’s chilling. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
I think the below may be true. MAGA Republicans are definitely fine right now with the highly classified documents that Donald Trump took appearing in Vanity Fair to show that Trump had magically gone back in time and declassified them. — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Tyler Cohen @briantylercohen
Republicans will literally expose us to a fucking nuclear attack by a foreign adversary if it means they get to pro… https://t.co/SWjF9uFIXy
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@Majesticeagle20 @GOP So you’re okay with highly classified documents that would put US intelligence officials who are overseas at risk appearing on the front pages of The NY Times? Just so you can protect Trump? Ridiculous. Also you don’t declassify documents by taking it with you. There’s a process. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
@mommysnewsskirt @GOP I never made that argument. The Inspector General found that emails on Hillary’s server did not have the proper classification markings and she did not know they were classified. That’s a very different situation from Trump intentionally taking documents he knew were classified. — PolitiTweet.org
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
There is no classification known as “only former Presidents can see them.” The @GOP argument that Trump can access highly classified documents described by the #Affidavit means that so can your dentist and the media and America’s enemies. That’s a ridiculous, treasonous argument. — PolitiTweet.org
Grant Stern is boosted! @grantstern
If Trump really declassified Secret, Top Secret, Confidential, HCS, FISA, ORCON, NOFORN, and SI documents, then Ame… https://t.co/Obp2XtfvNS
Ted Lieu @tedlieu
The MAGA Republican argument is that all U.S. national security documents described in the #Affidavit were magically declassified. That means not only can Trump see them, but also your neighbor. And the Iranians. And the Russians. That’s a traitorous argument being made by @GOP. — PolitiTweet.org
Josh Campbell @joshscampbell
A major point here: The FBI found documents marked "HCS," which refers to clandestine human sources who risk their… https://t.co/VTYTf19CWk