Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet interface.

Showing page 84 of 332.

Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

A third possibility is that he started off Covid-19 thinking this was the chance to be the Hero who Saves Mankind for which he'd been waiting for 25 years. He grasped the vax too tightly, and when bad results came in, he ignored them. So he's part Frankenstein, part Monster. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

Another possibility is that Gates has gone full Monster. He wanted to trick the world into taking shots that would kill them because of his concerns about over-population. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

Now we get to Covid-19.... One possibility is this is more Dr. Frankenstein behavior on the part of Gates. "To a man with a hammer, every problem looks like a nail." To Gates, every problem is a technology problem. Ignore failed technology and its costs, because... TECHNOLOGY! — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

But some of these attempts had unexpected consequences. Malaria netting was used to fish-out rivers in Africa, destroying them. Some vaccines backfired, causing polio, blindness, and death to hundreds of thousands in Africa and India. That's very Dr. Frankenstein-ish. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

They did some wonderful-seeming things against diseases. For example, they distributed millions of insect nets across Africa to prevent malaria, and funded vaccines across Africa and India, even funding the creation of their own. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

Bill & Melinda studied the matter for a couple years, and by around 1998 decided that what they would do with their billions is conquer disease in the developing world. They would do this through education (especially female), development work, and vaccines. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

For Buffett, that was: 1) Nuclear war. He funded the creation of the hotline between the Kremlin and the White House. 2) Overpopulation. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

Buffett's advice on charitable works was: Pick the one biggest issue you can solve, and solve it. For some people, that means, "I am going to make my local junior high school library the very best junior high school library in the county!" — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

Melinda married him, and had one goal: rehabilitate the image of Bill Gates. They already were rich. Bill & Melinda consciously set out to make him beloved by humanity, a hero to mankind. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

Old-timers from the 1990s may remember how Gates had a reputation as a ruthless operator. The press excoriated him as a robber/baron and the DOJ hunted him. "If Bill Gates saw a competitor drowning, he'd stick a garden hose down his throat." - Warren Buffett c. 1995. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

I do not know what Bill Gates is NOW, but I know what he WAS. I know because we had three people in common between us, and I heard all about him from them as the years ticked by. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

Remember that in the story of Frankenstein, the name of the monster is not "Frankenstein" (though our movies treat it that way). The name of the monster is, "The Monster". The young romantic passionate doctor/scientist who wants to save the world is, "Dr. Frankenstein". — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

So now we turn Bill Gates. I see two possibilities: 1) Gates is a Dr. Frankenstein, a man so carried away with technology he is blind to the risk to humanity; 2) Gates is a monster resembling Hitler. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

Until then, said Arendt, evil was indeed only accomplished by MONSTERS. Giants of a sort (think Lucifer in Milton's "Paradise Lost"). The REAL lesson of Eichmann, she said, was how the 20th century created men capable of evil, but a banal kind of evil. Bureaucrats, flunkies... — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

She claimed Eichmann had not even particularly disliked Jews: when Hitler gave him the assignment, Eichmann first sought to deport Jews to Palestine. But when that option closed, he set up the death camps, with no more thought than one would give creating a train schedule. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

What Arendt say (quite controversially) was not a monster, but a bureaucrat. A gray man in a suit. A flunky. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

The world's press showed up to the courtroom specifically built to accomodate them, and wrote the obvious predictable and obvious story: "There in the courtroom was this MONSTER who had killed millions of Jews!" But Arendt saw something more... Before I continue... — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

Adolph Eichmann, architect of Hitler's "Final Solution" for the Jews, was tracked down in Argentina, whisked back to Israel in 1963, and stood trial for architecting the murder of 6.5 million Jews in concentration camps. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

Here, this discussion brings back thoughts of Hannah Arendt's "Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil". Many of you should know the story by this point, but I will brief it concisely. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

@MrBulwarker I think you may be right. 10% of humanity now realizes they do not need the other 90%. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

The area of possible disagreement is Bill Gates. Here my thoughts are fuzzy. The worst suspicions of some of you MAY be correct. But I am puzzling it out for myself, and wonder if the truth is or is not more complicated. Is Gates just a monster? Or is there more to the story? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

OK. So it turns out that we all see eye-to-eye about just about all of it. Covid-19, CCP, USG, Fauci, FDA/CDC/DOD, Ivermectin/HCQ, and the "conspiracy theories" into which they fit. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

Before I go on I want to find out if I lost my audience. It seems we agree on: "How'd it happen (biologically & politically)?"; "Who was behind it?"; "Why?" for many players. But is my audience willing to entertain these deeper "conspiracy" explanations? Bezmenov & Genocide? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

The second deeper-Why? is not just to take us over, but to DESTROY us with genocide (following this pattern): 1) Panic people (so they are fight-or-flight); 2) Tribalize them (masks & vax cards vs. "anti-vaxers") 3) Demonization ("Pandemic of the unvaccinated!") 4) Genocide — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

The first deeper-Why? is a Bezmonov Psyop to takeover the USA: 1) Demoralization 2) Disorientation 3) Crisis 4) Normalization Demoralization was brought about by Covid (+ lockdowns, masks, and the dissension they brought) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

Still sticking on the "Why?" we now come to two deeper possible explanations. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

@RBellitzia I never use that. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

Big Pharma? The explanation is, "money". No great mystery there. And for many at CDC & FDA, with their patents, licenses, and stock holdings, the same explanation applies: Greed. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

@RBellitzia Which? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023
Profile Image

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

@WSR202 I corrected my list. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2023