Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 60 of 452.
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
@ZamirAtNAB Started? They never stopped — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
@frankpallotta You’re welcome — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
Would’ve been better if the MGM deal had been set at $7 billion. $007 billion. — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
For more on DC’s suit against Amazon: https://t.co/VknBrFTnYL — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
@_cingraham Congrats! Looking forward to more compelling cricket content by Chris! — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
Housing market aside, this sounds very Bethesda to me — PolitiTweet.org
Glenn Kelman @glennkelman
1 of 15: It has been hard to convey, through anecdotes or data, how bizarre the U.S. housing market has become. For… https://t.co/Btg9zv98T8
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
DC's contention is that the policy allows Amazon to exert anticompetitive pressure on sellers and the wider e-commerce ecosystem. Amazon's position is that it's no different from any storefront in deciding how to promote (or not) certain items. This should be interesting. — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
Central to understanding Amazon's reply is its Fair Pricing Policy, which states that Amazon may remove seller listings, give them less prominent placement on Amazon's site, or ban sellers in response to "pricing practices that harm customer trust." https://t.co/hcNzxXzjO7 https://t.co/B9vn8RjDQt — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
Amazon's statement on DC's antitrust lawsuit: https://t.co/kuWlvuqRNc — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
Right now it's just DC involved in the Amazon suit, Racine told reporters on a call a few minutes ago. He's not currently working with any state or federal officials on the issue and the complaint makes no allegations that Amazon has violated federal antitrust law. — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
By being unable to offer the same product on other e-commerce sites at a lower price, sellers have to bake in Amazon's fees for shoppers on, say, Walmart's website too, Racine alleges. — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
These higher prices exist, he alleges, because the price that sellers post on Amazon reflects the platform fees Amazon charges to its third-party sellers. — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
At issue are Amazon's terms that allegedly prohibit third-party sellers from offering their products on other websites at a lower price than on https://t.co/sDhpEV8lZp, which DC AG Karl Racine argues keeps prices inflated across the e-commerce market. — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
NEW: The District of Columbia is suing Amazon in DC Superior Court, alleging that its contract terms with third-party sellers governing product prices are anti-competitive and a violation of DC antitrust law. — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
DHS — via TSA — will create mandatory cyber guidelines for pipelines following the Colonial hack, per @nakashimae and @loriara: https://t.co/Z6YP7y3oiK — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
RT @issielapowsky: NEW: Now that the FCC's emergency broadband benefit has launched, digital equity advocates and ISPs alike are scrambling… — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
RT @Iyengarish: A big welcome back to @b_fung, who returned just in time for Apple and Epic's closing arguments! Here's our story from to… — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
(But it seems almost inevitable that whatever decision comes down will be appealed.) — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
Some brief reflections from me on today’s closing: The judge expressed openness to the possibility that Apple may have engaged in anticompetitive conduct, but was more skeptical of Epic’s monopoly claims as well as its proposed remedies, voicing concern about appellate review. — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
She likens this case to a puzzle, and it’s the court’s job to fit all the puzzle pieces together. “It will take me a while to do that." — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
Says there are "thousands and thousands of pages to review." — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
More YGR continued: “I want to try to get to this while the memories of the testimony is fresh and while the arguments are fresh." — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
Apparently the judge in a prior hearing joked about having a decision by Aug. 13 (the date last year when Epic released its Fortnite hotfix that kicked all of this off). She now says only some got the joke. “I am not promising to have this by Aug. 13 but I am going to try." — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
Things really wrapping now. Everyone is giving the judge and each other kudos for a job well done. — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
Apple: “The strategy here is to make the court aware of what Epic is asking, and if that is scary for Apple’s iOS customers… and for this court, that is simply a consequence of what Epic is asking for." — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
We’re entering the final stretch here as each side is being given several minutes to make closing remarks. — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
Epic says that’s misleading, and that its primary remedy calls for allowing for other app stores outside of the Apple app store, not a “store within a store within a store." — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
Apple raises the specter of a “store within a store within a store,” reiterating how apps within these other stores would be unaccountable to Apple and pose risks to consumers. — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
The judge again says to Epic that it hasn’t presented a compelling example of a case involving private plaintiffs where the relief sought has been granted by a court. — PolitiTweet.org
Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung
The judge is now going after Epic, asking how it can call for allowing sideloading in iOS when it has also sued Google, whose Android OS allows sideloading. Epic says just because you permit sideloading in iOS doesn’t turn iOS into Android, and it has other issues with Android. — PolitiTweet.org
