Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet interface.

Showing page 93 of 266.

Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

John, the Chief Justice did not decline. You voted to block my proposal. Why are you and Trump so afraid to allow an impartial judge to decide on requests for witnesses and documents? That’s how we conduct FAIR trials in America. — PolitiTweet.org

Senator John Cornyn @JohnCornyn

Senators Schumer, Warren, Van Hollen, and Congressman Schiff each tried to suck the Chief Justice into the vortex o… https://t.co/DAfMVvJdNn

Posted Feb. 2, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

RT @SenSchumer: We forced a fourth vote on @ChrisVanHollen’s amendment to require Chief Justice Roberts to rule on motions to subpoena witn… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 1, 2020 Retweet
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

RT @SenateDems: Senate Democrats forced a fourth vote on @ChrisVanHollen’s amendment to require Chief Justice Roberts to rule on motions to… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 1, 2020 Retweet
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

Under the Senate rules, we can direct the Chief Justice to make the initial determination on witnesses and documents. Furthermore, the Constitution gives us the “sole Power to try all Impeachments.” By opposing my amendment, Republicans have shown they don’t want a fair trial. https://t.co/qlWnIZ4xO1 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 1, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

RT @DSenFloor: Sen. @ChrisVanHollen offered an amendment to require the Chief Justice to rule on motions to subpoena witnesses and document… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 1, 2020 Retweet
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

If we can't agree on anything else, we should be able to agree on this: Let’s have an impartial process by having the Chief Justice decide which witnesses and documents are relevant. I will offer this amendment tonight. But, no matter the result, the truth will come out. https://t.co/uzp01EUzwJ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 1, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

By blocking the sworn testimony of key witnesses, GOP senators just told America they are more interested in covering up the truth than finding it. For the first time in our history, they blocked all witnesses in an impeachment trial. There is no vindication in a sham trial. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 31, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

I didn’t have a chance to ask the White House defense team, but they should elaborate on how “constitutional crimes” as discussed in the book—which the White House defense team included NINE TIMES in the President’s brief—differs from what they call “common” or “ordinary” crime. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 31, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

It's worth noting too that Charles Black and Philip Bobbitt cite Nixon’s use of impoundments to hold back congressionally-appropriated funds as one of “the most constitutionally consequential charges against him.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 31, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

They also call the idea that a president must commit a statutory crime to be impeached one of the seven fallacies—or common misconceptions—about impeachment. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 31, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

Here’s what “Impeachment: A Handbook"—the book the President’s own lawyers called an “authority on impeachment”—says about Dershowitz’s argument: “the limitation of impeachable offenses to those offenses made generally criminal by statute is unwarranted—even absurd.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 31, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

The other day, Mr. Philbin kept referencing “Impeachment: A Handbook." So I did some digging. Turns out, in that same book, the authors call conspiring with foreign governments to assist a campaign a HIGH CRIME. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 31, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

I just joined @maddow to talk about the Q&A portion of the impeachment trial, what we can expect next, and why the entire Senate, both Republicans and Democrats, should trust Chief Justice Roberts to decide on witnesses, evidence, and claims of executive privilege. https://t.co/GM4kUS5Lc8 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 31, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

Sekulow said it's “constitutionally inappropriate” to allow the Chief Justice to decide on witnesses and documents.… https://t.co/LhyMOMSkkL — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 31, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

Our question to both sides: Are you opposed to having the Chief Justice make the initial determinations regarding the relevance of documents and witnesses to the impeachment charges, particularly as the Senate could disagree with the Chief Justice’s ruling by a majority vote? https://t.co/4nqjzBegEm — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 31, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

Well said, @RepAdamSchiff. The House Managers agreed to have the Chief Justice rule on witness testimony and to respect his decisions. Why won’t the President’s lawyers? I hope my Republican colleagues will vote yes on my motion to make this impartial idea a reality. https://t.co/Osr5CqlmNZ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

This is absolutely repugnant. Doing this would send a statement to any future whistleblower: If you use legal channels to expose abuses of power, you will be retaliated against. We live in a democracy, not an autocratic state. https://t.co/c27grVlD1D — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

Remember this, when Trump said his tax cuts for the wealthy would “start to rock” the economy to growth rates of “4… https://t.co/7JENIuOpWd — PolitiTweet.org

Joe Scarborough @JoeNBC

The US economy limped along with 2.3% GDP growth a year after Trump’s massive tax cuts for the world’s biggest corp… https://t.co/GLQATLCcWp

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

RT @SenateDems: Question from @ChrisVanHollen: What did National Security Advisor John Bolton mean when he referenced “whatever drug deal… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020 Retweet
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

The Trump Tax Scam for the wealthy and big corporations has pushed the annual deficit over $1 trillion and now the other shoe is dropping—Republicans say we have to cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid to foot the bill. Get the word out. — PolitiTweet.org

Jake Tapper @jaketapper

Federal spending: CBO projects a decade of trillion-dollar deficits and soaring US debt - CNNPolitics https://t.co/vgOPTujU4y

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

On Friday, I plan to offer a motion that will require Chief Justice Roberts to: 1. Subpoena witnesses and documents if he determines they are relevant. 2. Rule on any claims of executive privilege in order to expedite the trial. https://t.co/z7rc3PYZzA — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 30, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

The President’s defense team couldn’t answer my question on Bolton. It’s yet another reason we need to hear directl… https://t.co/d9XII5GjWV — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 29, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

My first question to the President's defense team and the House managers: What did National Security Advisor John B… https://t.co/gkbpmYMh8M — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 29, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

My first question to the President's defense team: What did National Security Advisor John Bolton mean when he referenced “whatever drug deal Sondland and Mulvaney are cooking up on this” and did he ever raise that issue in any meeting with President Trump? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 29, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

Today will begin the Q&A portion of the impeachment trial. Senators will have the chance to ask questions to both the House managers and the President’s defense team. I have a few prepared, which will be written on this notecard and asked by the Chief Justice on my behalf. https://t.co/EX9I1zdBPh — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 29, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

The EPA’s response today ducks the main question we asked: do they plan to enforce the pollution reduction targets in the Chesapeake Bay Agreement? Failure to enforce puts the heath of the Bay at risk. Without stronger assurances, we must take them to court. https://t.co/UGaECN45zg — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 29, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

Trump's one-sided plan is a recipe for even deeper division and undermines efforts to achieve a viable and sustaina… https://t.co/T8pz7LwUAj — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 28, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

I believe all Americans deserve the truth, regardless of political party or what cable network shows they watch. Let me know which facts you disagree with from my interview on Fox, @realDonaldTrump. Don’t you want the whole truth and nothing but the truth? https://t.co/V7LRG17092 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 28, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

This one-sided proposal is a cynical maneuver calculated to be rejected by the Palestinians and then green-light illegal annexation. It undermines decades of bipartisan U.S. policy and international law. Far from the “deal of the century” this is the “disaster of the decade.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 28, 2020
Profile Image

Senator Chris Van Hollen @ChrisVanHollen

Timing is everything here. The Trump plan is not about advancing peace. It’s a deliberately timed ploy to interfere in the Israeli elections by distracting attention from Netanyahu’s formal indictment for bribery today and to divert from Trump’s impeachment proceedings. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 28, 2020