Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 83 of 829.
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Every lawyer should know that just simply stating "in my humble opinion" doesn't relieve them of potential liability. In fact, this could constitute defamation per se as harming her in her professional capacity. Pay attention Mr. Chamberlain. Pay close attention. — PolitiTweet.org
Will Chamberlain @willchamberlain
Meet Elizabeth Deutsch. She's currently a law clerk for Justice Breyer. And, in my humble opinion, she's the most… https://t.co/66gDX7ok2O
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@EMarieTweets Explained here: https://t.co/iSQpVX0Mws — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Not only is it unhelpful to speculate abt identity of leaker (who does have some potential #whistleblower protection from prosecution) but especially unhelpful, and frankly unprofessional, to speculate based on absolutely no evidence whatsoever. Literally, she's making things up. — PolitiTweet.org
Justin Baragona @justinbaragona
Fox News anchor Julie Banderas: "This is why this was leaked. I mean, we all knew it was a Democrat who leaked it." https://t.co/TvqqdWxEI9
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
RT @CGCComics: While Star Wars #42 released in December 1980 (this copy graded CGC 9.6) is widely accepted as the first comic appearance of… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@SaraKropf @kylenabecker @HoleHistory @capricelroberts And I agree that no crime (based on known facts to date) applies if draft was simply "leaked", at least not one that doesn't require tortured interpretation of statutes. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@SaraKropf @kylenabecker @HoleHistory @capricelroberts There could be #whistleblower component to distribution of this draft opinion that precludes prosecution by DOJ policy. Certainly won't protect against disciplinary action or professional/ethical review. https://t.co/iSQpVX0Mws — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
BTW, here is DOJ policy on one of the statutes he references. https://t.co/iSQpVX0Mws — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Neither of these laws will ever be applied to the SCOTUS leak, nor do they apply other than with really tortured interpretation of statute. This is really unhelpful & appears reflective of talking head trying to just say something "new" during their segment. — PolitiTweet.org
Acyn @Acyn
“There’s at least two federal laws that I think may have been violated… Theft of government property… disclosure of… https://t.co/kGKPTwvjez
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Looks to be vindication for a lawful whistleblower. https://t.co/8XabR9Q6PR — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
https://t.co/8XabR9Q6PR — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@BradMossEsq https://t.co/txAnEuZKvE — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Alas, the OH results just cancelled me! That's showbiz! — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
I'll be on as soon as they stop discussing the OH GOP Senate results! — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
RT @WalshFreedom: I’ve had so many GOP base voters today tell me this exact thing: “Joe, this leak was the real insurrection.” @MarkSZaidEs… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
RT @emilybrooksnews: Also: What could consequences for leaker look like? @MarkSZaidEsq, @BradMossEsq, & @JonathanTurley say leaking draft p… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Those who run the Federalist disgrace it with their extreme, usually legally or factually inaccurate, views more so every day. Some (but not all) #January6th participants committed actual insurrection, as a matter of law. But Federalist won't admit that. — PolitiTweet.org
Bad Legal Takes @BadLegalTakes
https://t.co/erRnL4jF9M
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@GabiMccauley @CNN @thelauracoates Yes — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
I am scheduled to be on @CNN tonight w/@thelauracoates during 9 pm hour (sometime after 9:20 pm) to discuss leak - and potential consequences to leaker - of #SCOTUS draft opinion that would overturn #RoeVsWade. Some preliminary comments are here: https://t.co/nEylorrRTP — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
RT @GwynneMaggie: Dreamt I was arrested (baseless of course!) and my first call was to @MarkSZaidEsq, relayed through a helpful State Dept… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Respectfully, and especially as an attorney who represents #whistleblowers, I don't find it helpful to speculate on who might have leaked draft SCOTUS opinion. I've already seen widely speculative views hitting both left & right. — PolitiTweet.org
Michael Beschloss @BeschlossDC
Anyone have an opinion about who leaked this draft decision about Roe v. Wade? And what was the leaker’s motive?
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
18 U.S.C. § 1503 - "obstruction of justice" as an act that "corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice." Not applicable. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Journalists take note for future time when you receive a leaked document. — PolitiTweet.org
Benjamin Freed @brfreed
This is how you protect sources. https://t.co/CLGfa7WyIq
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
RT @BadLegalTakes: https://t.co/RaJ1QqZLrE — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Which undermines anyone's assertion that leak of draft could be pursued as criminal obstruction of Court. — PolitiTweet.org
Greg Stohr @GregStohr
BREAKING: Roberts confirms authenticity of draft Dobbs opinion, says it doesn't represent anyone's final position.… https://t.co/S8UsrZBhSw
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Excellent thread on prior SCOTUS leaks. It might not happen as often as does w/Legislative or Executive Branches, but there's history. Truthfully, most leakers - even of classified info (which is criminal) - are rarely identified. — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Peters @jonathanwpeters
It's remarkable, the leak of what appears to be an initial draft majority opinion. SCOTUS generally has kept its se… https://t.co/JXiMHTdTxE
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Extremely doubtful leak itself would ever be prosecuted even if stretch could be made to fit per generic statute. Would apply to too many daily situations. But professional consequences could occur to leaker & if they lie during investigation then criminal penalties could apply. — PolitiTweet.org
SCOTUSblog @SCOTUSblog
JUST IN: The Supreme Court confirms the authenticity of the draft opinion revealed last night by Politico. The chie… https://t.co/fkHSXfTIKQ
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Having experienced #whistleblower attorneys who know how to navigate system makes a difference. @wbaidlaw @AndrewBakaj @BradMossEsq — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
We are still reviewing but @DHSOIG report looks to be significant vindication for our #whistleblower client #BrianMurphy whose lawful efforts bravely reported misconduct during Trump Admin at highest levels of @DHSgov. https://t.co/XceUBKA8b5 — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@emilybrooksnews @BradMossEsq @JonathanTurley @AndrewCMcCarthy Could square peg be pushed through round hole, i.e., force criminal fit? Possibly. But then it would likely apply to so many other daily situations to be untenable for DOJ to pursue. Firing offense, yes? Criminal application, doubtful. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@JunqueiraLiv We get capes. — PolitiTweet.org
