Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 225 of 829.
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@Bob4Florida Yea, right Bob. Sure. Good luck in selling that and your agenda. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@Mindy30625784 @harryallisonjr That's just not how military ops and decisions are made. And definitely not ones in Israel which does not view pr damage as significant as other countries might. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Can probably count on one hand the number of times this deep water fish washes ashore. Pretty wild. — PolitiTweet.org
CNN @CNN
An unusual fish with teeth as sharp as glass and a body shaped like a football washed ashore on a California beach https://t.co/c1gnQPNxd4
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@Bob4Florida Neither the issue nor the question here Bob. But you might want to work on your own reputation first. Ciao. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
https://t.co/e2ccY8NsgL — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Help us bring #Libyan warlord #KhalifaHifter to justice & hold him accountable. @MattJury_Law https://t.co/xPkhX0W9fc — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@neilkli And another anonymous Twitter person reveals just how ignorant and biased they can be. Yea, I'm a terrorist supporter. 🤣 https://t.co/3FjtY1duOO — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@Bob4Florida Never mind. I see you have a wealth of experience. I defer to you Bob. https://t.co/CGJJr43p8i — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@Bob4Florida Never mind. I see you have a wealth of experience. I defer to you Bob. https://t.co/CGJJr43p8i — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@Bob4Florida You might want to look up Art 51 of the UN Charter. Please do continue to educate me on intl law. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@Bob4Florida Do tell Bob. School us all on who I am. And who you are. Love to hear. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@ProfessorShaw I do not know Israel's proof other than they are apparently claiming Hamas was conducting offensives ops from bldg. All I'm saying is that what that proof is, if any, makes complete difference abt legal vs illegal. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
RT @CREWcrew: "Bad faith bankruptcy" really does not sound good from a legal perspective https://t.co/iKf6dOreGV — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@JregF And this video shows what with respect to intl law? — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@MD_Garza Just read Twitter and you'll see the "ppl". — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@Bob4Florida Do you live in a large bldg in what amounts to a war zone? I have no doubt you'd be upset under your fact pattern, but that doesn't mean it's not legal or justified. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@kam3266 You mean AP statement that said "We received a warning that the building would be hit." The one that said they evacuated everyone safely? But I'm just guessing. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@JameelJaffer Are you insinuating that there are no facts that wld make this a legitimate, lawful military strike? https://t.co/9rHC18CBEc — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Ppl are rushing to judgment abt strike. More details needed. If IDF statement is true, longstanding accepted intl l… https://t.co/x3fV5X9xUJ
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
To be very clear, all I am saying is that more facts are needed & ppl should not be rushing to judgment. Unclear yet if strike was lawful or unlawful. Anyone who says to contrary is showing agenda & bias for one side (Israel) or another (Hamas). — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@Jognop @Vinncent All I am saying is that more facts are needed & ppl should not be rushing to judgment. Unclear yet if strike was lawful or unlawful. Anyone who says to contrary is showing agenda & bias for one side or another. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@kam3266 Uh, no, they did not. That much is known. Advance warning was given for journalists & civilians to leave bldg & area, consistent with intl law. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@harryallisonjr And what if planning and implementation of missile strikes on civilian Israeli targets were being planned from that bldg? Legally justified? — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@Jognop @Vinncent Do you think during WWII the Allies were publicly releasing their evidence for every action they took? Since when is that a thing? — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@extracheesen @JregF Obviously Israel would have had any existing facts in its possession in advance of strike. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@deadxdead @JimLaPorta @reporterjoe @IDF And that's an excellent question. No doubt reasonable minds could differ on answer. Obviously Israel thought so. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@DrewSmokesWeed @the_mjl And what law says that? — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@Barleymasher Depends on what was being done from the building. And it was not civilian occupied when struck in light of the advance warnings. That's what would make strike legal under certain circumstances. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@Jognop @Vinncent Unless you know all the facts, you can't say that. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@schwellenbach @nixonron I have no issue with that statement. It's consistent with what I am saying. It is mostly how others are reporting the story that is the problem. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@ashtonpittman Which is why Israel needs to do more than issue a statement. It needs to provide prove of it. But if it does, legitimate military target & Hamas committed war crime. I don't know which is true. — PolitiTweet.org
