Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 209 of 829.
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@ATSNLG @RichardWeinbe17 Personally, I do agree there should be a line. But courts have adopted incredibly broad range of activities for scope of employment. Literally 24/7 for some positions. Don't look at what was said. No matter how horrible or defamatory. It's where, why & context that matters. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@ATSNLG @RichardWeinbe17 You can disagree all you want but that's the governing authority of law and precedent. And the 2nd Cir will disagree with you. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
#StargateRules — PolitiTweet.org
Nerdist @nerdist
One step closer to a Stargate. https://t.co/VzMgLx3jMu
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@K99Lorin Hopefully we'll learn more soon. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@DBCooperPodcast @DangerProbe I do still believe there is significant evidence DB Cooper was Rackstraw. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@ATSNLG @RichardWeinbe17 Issue isn't what topic is about. Legal relevance is when comment was made. In this case, in WH Oval Office while serving as president. FYI, deleted my tweet as realized I responded to wrong topic. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
https://t.co/b89K92WTLv — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
https://t.co/BGi8LWJ0fH — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
We solved who #DBCooper was years ago through our cold case team investigation. Well, I thought we had. Apparently it was #Loki. Ok, didn't see that one coming. https://t.co/dxroyASiMH — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@RichardWeinbe17 A JUDGE signed off on it. As for career prosecutors. All part of the partisan conspiracy too? — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@RichardWeinbe17 @MarksZaid That must be it anonymous person — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@images_mc I don't know if we know enough specifics yet but definitely reported by media that judge signed off on the subpoenas. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@Done4nowDone 100% in my opinion. But what do I know, right? — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@zacariaskomins That's definitely not true. Certainly there have been prior congressional corruption cases & criminal investigations, but something like is is absolutely not common. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@capeannsky Definitely exaggeration to say unethical and - possibly - unsupportable (we just don't knew yet). — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@andgegard Tell ppl to quit being hyper partisan — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@dcdeejay How was it obstruction of justice? It didn't obstruct anything. Again, court authorized warrants. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@ChrisAndersen And that's relevant to this.....? — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@JanNWolfe Good quote. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@wexlerwriting Yes, I believe so. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Let's not exaggerate. Many questions to ask abt subpoena of congressional phone records. Very unprecedented in leak context. Real slippery policy slope. But not illegal. Not an "active crime scene". Authorized by Court in fact. — PolitiTweet.org
Maddow Blog @MaddowBlog
Maddow to DOJ officials: Wake up, you guys! You're going to work every day at an active crime scene, and there's no… https://t.co/u1o7NLjMDn
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
RT @NatCryptoMuseum: Steganography is the art of hiding messages. In 2010, @FBI arrested 10 Russians posing as U.S. citizens who were sendi… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
RT @WarOnTheRocks: Beth Van Schaack, a professor at Stanford Law School and a former deputy to the ambassador-at-large for war crimes issue… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
RT @AndrewDesiderio: NEWS: Barr distances himself from DOJ’s secret subpoenas of Democratic lawmakers, telling @politico that that while he… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
I hope this is true. Regardless, it's cult conspiracy impact will be felt for some time. — PolitiTweet.org
Virginia Heffernan @page88
Time to notice that QAnon is finished. My column @latimesopinion : https://t.co/JpaoEP8wzl
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
#ConsequencesForSedition How disgraceful that a law enforcement officer was involved. — PolitiTweet.org
NBC News @NBCNews
A officer with the Chicago Police Dept. was arrested and charged for his alleged role in the Jan. 6 riots at the U.… https://t.co/yivsCMemlP
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
GOP Secretary of State. But apparently @GOP doesn't care. — PolitiTweet.org
GA Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState
The continuing false claims of a stolen election have led to violent/death threats, intimidation, and claims of pri… https://t.co/Jf9sKywsUl
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
RT @RoScarborough: Trump, his supporters need to ease up on voter fraud claims. Ga. election workers are being threatened. Ga. did hand rec… — PolitiTweet.org
GA Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState
The continuing false claims of a stolen election have led to violent/death threats, intimidation, and claims of pri… https://t.co/Jf9sKywsUl
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Very true. In fact, 4/9 Justices favorably commented that criminal prosecution of @nytimes might have resulted in completely different decision than govt failure to meet high burden of civil injunction. #PentagonPapers — PolitiTweet.org
Peter Baker @peterbakernyt
Among the pieces is a fascinating look at the legal consequences by the one and only @adamliptak who says that the… https://t.co/9TKJQGFk7i
Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@peterbakernyt @adamliptak Nope, it wasn't. In fact, 4/9 Justices favorably commented that criminal prosecution of @nytimes might have resulted in completely different decision than govt failure to meet high burden of civil injunction. — PolitiTweet.org
