Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 317 of 630.
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Meanwhile, Trump's choice for the Federal Reserve says that the income tax is evil and that "Capitalism is a lot more important than democracy" 2/ https://t.co/cS2OQBWgnd — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
The GOP plan for the election: to paint Dems as extremists with a combination of out of context quotes and flat-out lies 1/ https://t.co/Cy8xKZpNLw — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
RT @JanetGornick: @paulkrugman is on @CNBC "The next downturn will be a ‘smorgasbord recession’". @stone_lis @GC_CUNY @jmalt87 Stay tuned f… — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
RT @KFILE: Stephen Moore: "I don't really think I've said anything much about the gold – I'm not in favor of a gold standard." Erin Burnet… — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
In this, as in so much else, the rot runs deep. Trumpism is not an aberration 9/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
And as far as I can tell, not one of the SRCEs has spoken against Moore's appointment. In fact, Greg Mankiw is pretty much the only prominent Republican economist willing to speak up against a man they all know is a charlatan and crank 8/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
There's a whole class of what I've taken to calling SRCEs – supposedly respectable conservative economists – who happily fed the GOP's monetary delusions. The 2010 open letter to Ben Bernanke gives you a good sample 7/ https://t.co/1jZBEcL7AQ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
On the contrary, to be a Republican economist in good standing, you have to have been consistently wrong about monetary policy, and refuse to admit that you were wrong. Moore is a flamboyant example, but not unique 6/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
In fact, the concept of core inflation is one of the economic doctrines that – along with the liquidity trap and the Keynesian multiplier – came through the post-crisis years with flying colors. But there has been no reckoning on the right 5/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Of course, they didn't demand monetary expansion during the commodity price dip of 2015-6 – only GOP presidents get expansionary monetary policy. Still, let's act as if they were sincere. Surely the failure of runaway inflation to materialize should have provoked rethinking 4/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Republicans gave the Fed huge grief over that view. During the period 2010-2012, when commodity prices were rising due to global recovery, they kept insisting that this was a sign of imminent runaway inflation requiring tight money 3/ https://t.co/zqEyy93uu1 — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Here's the history of commodity price inflation vs the Fed's preferred measure of core inflation since 2005. The Fed's view has always been that core, which excludes volatile commodity prices, is a better guide to underlying inflation 2/ https://t.co/NbKJJWJ1e6 — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
And what he now claims to support -- pegging the dollar to a basket of commodities – would be almost as bad as a gold standard. There's a history here – a history people like Moore refuse to learn from 1/ — PolitiTweet.org
Stuart Rothenberg @StuPolitics
Steve Moore just said on CNN that he doesn't support a return to the gold standard. Then Erin Burnett ran three cli… https://t.co/SHtFIpc9My
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
A really interesting piece from @sjwrenlewis on British media failures, in particular the failure to appreciate how far right the Tories had gone. Obvious parallels with US, where many pundits somehow keep being surprised by GOP extremism https://t.co/6jkpnZtcfi — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
RT @MaxKennerly: Five years ago, @paulkrugman called out Moore in a column titled "Charlatans, Cranks and Kansas." Moore's response in the… — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
I guess astrophysicist Katie Bouman is now in the same honored category as Captain Marvel: any kind of female achievement brings out the trolls https://t.co/55xfB3PZLx — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Indeed. While Stephen Moore is totally unqualified for the Fed, his actual policy views are also really stupid — PolitiTweet.org
Justin Wolfers @JustinWolfers
For a moment, take Moore at his word. He's arguing that a headline "U.S. Fed raises interest rates on news of weak… https://t.co/gcbuKbbXvj
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
GND vs M4A: I'd take either gladly if we can get them, but I think the Green New Deal is smart strategy but Medicare for All -- as opposed to plans that let private insurance continue -- isn't https://t.co/19mO1Y5ZF6 — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Purity vs. Pragmatism, Environment vs. Health https://t.co/5rEWcSDpP8 — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Hence the Green New Deal. In the end, I expect and hope that a carbon tax will end up being part of that program. But the program has to deliver a lot to make people accept that tax 7/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
That's why it's a good idea to link NYC's new congestion charge to subway repair and renovation. And since a carbon tax is a much bigger thing, it would need to be sold as part of major program of life-changing investments 6/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
I think the same thing would happen to a redistributed carbon tax. Some people would be furious -- think of the yellow vests in France -- while the broad public wouldn't notice their gains. To work, climate action has to be linked to things that loom large in people's lives 5/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Think of the political failure of the Trump tax cut. yes, it was terrible policy. But it did give many voters a little bit of a cut. Yet the sums involved were small, and most people didn't even notice them 4/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
What we need, then, is something that gives ordinary people a stake in climate legislation. Yet like @drvox, I don't think a carbon tax redistributed as a dividend to the public would do the job. Why? Because it wouldn't generate enough intensity 3/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Waxman-Markey wasn't an idealistic attempt to achieve the politically impossible; it tried to buy off interest groups by giving them the emission rights under cap and trade. But its pragmatism was aimed at appeasing industry, not getting public buy-in 2/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
I want to return to this @drvox thread on why the climate bill failed in 2009-10; he thinks the lessons make the case for a Green New Deal, and so do I 1/ https://t.co/bde5waJ52D — PolitiTweet.org
David Roberts @drvox
1. In 2013, famed political scientist Theda Skocpol released an influential analysis of what went wrong with the 20… https://t.co/vRDOAaJPcz
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
RT @drvox: 1. In 2013, famed political scientist Theda Skocpol released an influential analysis of what went wrong with the 2008-2010 clima… — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
RT @JanetGornick: Yes, that's pretty much it. (The number fluctuates a bit, year to year). #secondgildedage Source: Forbes. https://t.co/… — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
RT @tribelaw: I agree with @LHSummers here. The law is clear that the Treasury Secretary has no authority to prevent IRS from complying wit… — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
RT @donie: NEW: Racist and anti-Semitic comments flooded YouTube livestream of congressional hearing on white nationalism. YouTube was fo… — PolitiTweet.org