Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 154 of 630.
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
So if you're shocked by what's happening now, you just weren't paying attention. Denial of reality has been central to modern conservatism for a long time 3/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
And before that it was a party that embraced the notion that climate change was a hoax perpetrated by a vast global scientific cabal 2/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
If you're shocked that only 1 in 10 Congressional Republicans is willing to accept the election results, bear in mind that this is a party that dismissed mass deaths from Covid-19 as fake news 1/ https://t.co/GPUS7I8j6A — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
And let's not forget this https://t.co/PVsS4NqXPj — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
For some reason I haven't seen many people noting that we've passed a milestone — 7 day average Covid deaths, more meaningful than daily rates, have now passed their April peak. So much for claims that we were just testing more https://t.co/ZuClVtkUMZ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
The moral here is that if Democrats take those Senate seats in GA, Biden should go ahead and spend on his priorities, ignoring deficit scolds. In the economy we have now, deficits are good 4/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
So what did go right? As I've been saying, inadvertent and unadmitted Keynesianism: big increase in cyclically adjusted deficits, driving demand 3/ https://t.co/NfXyna5OoH — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
And here's trade: 2/ https://t.co/t89pHGWutS — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
The paradox of the Trump economy: the economy did pretty well even though his two main policy initiatives — cutting taxes on corporations to encourage investment and tariffs to reduce trade deficits — were busts. Here's business investment: 1/ https://t.co/8LZE9Cx76F — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Gov. Murphy of NJ is not being polite to people who willfully endanger others. You got a problem with that? https://t.co/hA1cmTmsLr — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
So there's a lot of communicating and persuasion to be done. I wonder if any of Biden's economic advisers understand all of this? Oh, wait 3/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Unfortunately, aside from GOP sabotage, I don't think enough policy-adjacent people get this. I've been getting the same impression of failure to comprehend that, it seems, Jason Furman is getting 2/ https://t.co/NRhNMt1JQe — PolitiTweet.org
Jason Furman @jasonfurman
Fiscal policymakers are far, far behind central bankers in reconsidering macroeconomic policy in an era of low inte… https://t.co/NXBH7xrGxq
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
I'd say it's a combination of slow growth in working-age pop and lack of investment-driving new technology, but it doesn't matter that much; the point, as you say, is that we're awash in excess savings, and resources aren't scarce 1/ https://t.co/LmDKtg5tNy — PolitiTweet.org
Jared Bernstein @econjared
@paulkrugman Great points, @paulkrugman. But riddle me this: why does it take such strong pro-cyclical monetary and… https://t.co/9c3G0oRFSk
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
This tells you part of the stakes in the GA runoffs: if Rs hold the Senate, they will try to reverse this stimulus to cripple the Biden economy 3/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
The federal govt was providing roughly as much stimulus in 2019, with 4% unemployment, as in 2012, with 8% unemployment. The stimulus was badly designed — in particular, corporate tax cuts didn't boost investment. But still 2/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Looking back at the Trump economy, what's striking is how Keynesian policy was in practice. Look at the cyclically adjusted budget deficit, a rough measure of fiscal stimulus 1/ https://t.co/dqrhTBtPHd https://t.co/bySyKp2f80 — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
The truly terrifying thing is that millions of people think that Trump was a great president, and that zombie Hugo Chavez stole his much-deserved reelection 4/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Meanwhile, the virus was supposed to go away; instead, 200,000 more people have died, with high likelihood that another 100,000 or more will die before Trump leaves office 3/ https://t.co/kPt2Lb6SSB — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
This was supposed to lead to rapid economic recovery; in fact, after a few months the recovery slowed and has now effectively stalled, with the US still ~10 million jobs down 2/ https://t.co/BDYF6ieNiT — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
So, I was too busy to comment on the jobs numbers this AM. But let's step back: you should see where we are in the context of Trump's decision, back in April, to stop fighting the virus and in fact bully states into relaxing restrictions 1/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
RT @nytopinion: . @PaulKrugman responded to readers commenting on his column "Learn to Stop Worrying and Love Debt." Join the conversation… — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Oh, and since someone will surely bring it up, none of this has anything to do with MMT; it's pure mainstream analysis, but reflecting the reality of low interest rates 10/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
As I see it, at this point alarming long-run projections involve an element of unintentional bait-and-switch. They look as if they're being driven by the unsustainability of entitlement programs, but they're actually reflecting dubious assumptions about interest rates 9/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Without the assumed rise in rates, projected deficits would be much lower, debt considerably lower, and real interest payments much lower than CBO projects. The long-run budget outlook wouldn't look especially scary 8/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Well, it's all about interest rates, which CBO assumes will rise back to mid-2000s levels. Obviously this could be true — predictions are hard, especially about the future. But not clear why we should believe this 7/ https://t.co/mREhtsPPQr — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
And it's not mainly bc of rising debt: CBO projects debt/GDP doubling, but interest/GDP rising by a factor of 5. Why? 6/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Actually, though, the biggest component is a huge assumed rise in interest costs 5/ https://t.co/b82Hv8VSYr — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
CBO projects a big rise in spending as % of GDP, and if you don't look under the hood you might well assume that this is driven by fundamentals, especially the aging population 4/ https://t.co/sCECy9RjhQ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
But while I respect CBO's integrity, those long-run debt projections are much more questionable than people probably realize. Realistic projections, I (and many sensible economists) argue, are much less alarming 3/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Now, many people will surely start waving around frightening-looking projections, like those of the CBO 2/ https://t.co/J2XjDKa90L — PolitiTweet.org