Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 125 of 630.
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
The obvious point: Dems know that they face scorched-earth GOP opposition to everything, but (some) journalists still pretend that Biden could be bipartisan if he wanted, so this is a way to say hey, we are bipartisan, if you look at public opinion — PolitiTweet.org
G. Elliott Morris @gelliottmorris
More examples of public opinion polls helping the people get what they want out of government, this time from Psaki… https://t.co/mVaZQSZKIM
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Podcasting about the Biden agenda and all that, with Betsey Stevenson and Al Franken https://t.co/rantLy50qO — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Oh, and it was entirely bond-financed; no pay-fors except the prospect of future tolls 4/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
And this was a state, not a national project. As a share of New York's GDP, it was probably the equivalent of a national project > $1 trillion today 3/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
But the US economy was vastly smaller then than it is now, and prices were much lower. This may have been almost 1% of a year's GDP, the equivalent of ~$200 billion today 2/ https://t.co/V8LpBUd1Io — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Having a bit of fun delving into the history of infrastructure spending. Q: how big a deal was the Erie Canal? It cost $7 million, which sounds trivial. 1/ https://t.co/NanE6cT1Zy — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Facts don't necessarily matter. But I suspect Rs will need to come up with something better than the claim that taxing corporate profits is unpatriotic 5/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
And if you get into the weeds (which I'm trying to do), there were badly designed provisions in the TCJA that actually encouraged investment outside the US 4/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
As a result, Trump's tax cut was basically a giveaway to stockholders — and foreigners own 40 percent of US equities 3/ https://t.co/r4hCplNzOh — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
But it didn't. 2/ https://t.co/K06LaWTAlS — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
This attack might have a smidgen of credibility if the Trump tax cut had actually caused corporations to bring money back to America and invest more 1/ https://t.co/fI54n3gp9D — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Maybe the Biden team knows what it's doing ... — PolitiTweet.org
Sahil Kapur @sahilkapur
Buried in the new Morning Consult/Politico poll is an eye-popping statistic: Voters by a 2-to-1 margin prefer a $3… https://t.co/BCuxgjUgLF
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
In a way, Biden is positioning himself as a greener Dwight Eisenhower, on both spending and taxes. Not a bad place to be ... 7/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Republicans gonna Republican, shouting "job-killing" and "socialism." Biden team should hope they keep it up — this plays well to their faithful, but not with the rest of the country 6/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Gotta say I really like Greg Sargent's phrase "forward-looking nostalgia". Big infrastructure is an American tradition, from the Erie Canal to the Interstate Highway System.5/ https://t.co/PAXESs1IQA — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
But Biden team knows all this. If they can pass tax increases linked to physical infrastructure, this creates space for being relaxed about budget implications of child care etc initiatives 4/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Real interest rate over time (using previous 3-year core inflation) 3/ https://t.co/eViZnWxARf — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Also very much agree that the case for a full pay-for via taxes is weak, given extremely low real interest rates, which are a triple reason to spend: we can afford it, private sector doesn't see high returns, and it means that we need to worry about secular stagnation 2/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Agree with just about everything here. This looks like a solid plan, with almost everything justified; but it should be only part of building back better — the really high-return public investments are probably in people, especially children 1/ — PolitiTweet.org
Jason Furman @jasonfurman
Overall I quite like the American Jobs Plan. It is a serious proposal that would help increase economic growth, ens… https://t.co/0xkibmgoPl
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Infrastructure week has actually arrived! — PolitiTweet.org
Jeff Stein @JStein_WaPo
NEW: Part I of "Build Back Better" expected to = $2.25 in spending, $400B in clean energy credits Precise #s may c… https://t.co/pQZhr7FqsZ
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
The conservative establishment no longer controls the GOP — the bigots are now in charge — and right-wing economic policies are unpopular. Why doesn't the party move left? https://t.co/WJZeV4XVGn — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
RT @nytopinion: "Why are elected Republicans still so committed to right-wing economic policies that help the rich while shortchanging the… — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Anyway, I hope that the slight Very Serious People vibes I'm getting don't end up doing too much damage 5/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Of course, one possibility is that the administration expects some parts of the ARP — child tax credit and ACA enhancements — to become permanent, adding sustained stimulus 4/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
Under those conditions sustained deficit spending on investment is actually good — which was the case Larry Summers was ably making before he began his crusade against the ARP 3/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
The stimulus from the American Rescue Plan will be largely in the rear-view mirror by the time infrastructure ramps up; we'll probably be back in an environment of weak demand and low interest rates 2/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
This is preliminary, and probably being floated in part to get reactions. But for what it's worth, it sounds as if the Biden plan will be too deficit-averse 1/ https://t.co/qbDsFvOszn — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
The whole dynamic is remarkable: GOP intransigence is actually empowering policies much more progressive than those of the early Obama years, because centrist Dems have nobody on their right to compromise with 2/ — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
So far Build Back Better is looking politically like the American Rescue Plan: it's likely to be enacted on a straight party-line vote, but also to be highly popular. 1/ https://t.co/nNiDUPzq5r — PolitiTweet.org
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman
RT @nytopinion: . @PaulKrugman responded to readers commenting on his column "The Decline of Republican Demonization." Join the conversatio… — PolitiTweet.org