(((tedfrank)))

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @TrungTPhan: Up to the 1990s, raw salmon sushi was not eaten in Japan. What changed? Norway went on a 10-year marketing campaign to sel… — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @dollarsanddata: Perfect case study of how “Everyone feels like a genius in a bull market” https://t.co/MNCVwr8hRZ — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@ChrisExpTheNews Throw it away and order the usual. Life is short. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

Even has a triangle. https://t.co/XSdcJ8ilAg — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @ojdunford: @RMFifthCircuit We ( @PacificLegal ) have a similar argument going in the 10th Circuit. We're asking for an injunction pendi… — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @grandoldmemes: https://t.co/KTO13JCDgP — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

He’s had a tough two years. Wish him health. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @ChristinaPushaw: 1. Identify a respected institution. 2. kill it. 3. gut it. 4. wear its carcass as a skin suit, while demanding respec… — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@keepaustinnasty @mckeds It’s certainly a point when it’s harmless error at worst, but it wasn’t even error. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@ABoyandHisYeti @mckeds What’s the core landlord? — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @kerpen: Biden's student loan bailout should really lose 9-0. Reminds me of the time Obama tried to make recess appointemnts while the… — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@LovesSardine @Natesfault Exactly. A no contact order doesn’t mean that the inmate gets to retroactively regret recorded statements he gave to third parties not working for the state. It means the state can’t interview him without the lawyer’s permission. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Natesfault @paulheaston @HanShawnity @realjeffreyross That “facilitates” test would bar prisons from providing phones to inmates, because the inmate might incriminate himself on the recorded line. Take the L. There’s no constitutional violation here. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Natesfault 1. A lawful execution isn’t murder, by definition. 2. The lawyers bringing frivolous cases to try to end the death penalty will happily bring frivolous cases to end life sentences once they get the murderers off death row. Hold the line. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@BillyPillgrm @Natesfault Yes, and I know the difference between a state agent and a third party. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@leah_nylen @tkdylan @nancyscola Not entirely randomly. There was a huge onion futures scandal in 1955 where a couple of traders cornered 98% of the market and caused price fluctuations from $2.75 to $0.10/bag that prompted the silly legislation. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@MercuryC0bra @whowhatnow56 Work on your reading comprehension if you’re really going to share my profession. And maybe read facts of a case before jumping to conclusions. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@MercuryC0bra @whowhatnow56 I said nothing of the sort. I merely am noting that there’s no injustice here. Fwiw, there’s not even a technical violation. This is a delay tactic to inflict more pain on the victims and expense on taxpayers. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@whowhatnow56 @mckeds Work on your reading comprehension. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@paulheaston @HanShawnity @Natesfault Fwiw, Ross denies it, but I was being ironic. Regardless of the truth of the allegations I was previously unaware of, I’m entertained that Ross’s roast incriminated a sociopath, but it was probably irrelevant given the overwhelming evidence of sociopathy. https://t.co/WKj9idIvxP — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@paulheaston @HanShawnity @Natesfault @realjeffreyross Yes. He asked to be interviewed. I’ll take your attempt to change the subject as an admission that you were talking out of your butt before when claiming a constitutional violation. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@paulheaston @HanShawnity @Natesfault @realjeffreyross The prison didn’t violate the no contact order. A no contact order means that state agents can’t ask to talk to the prisoner. No state agents asked to talk to the prisoner. The state subpoenaed a tape of a voluntary conversation with a third party. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Natesfault So he was supposed to be in solitary confinement? Is he not allowed to call his mother on a recorded line? A no contact request means the state can’t ask to speak with him. The sociopathic murderer asked to speak to the tv crew, and state subpoenaed the tape later. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@paulheaston @HanShawnity @Natesfault @realjeffreyross If I ask to be interviewed by a tv crew and incriminate myself, there isn’t a constitutional violation when the state later subpoenas the tape. Is SBF’s 6th Amendment right violated when DOJ uses his tweets against him? His counsel sure didn’t authorize the tweets. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@CreatedInTheD One take is fictional. TV crew came in, said they wanted to interview prisoners, the sociopathic murderer volunteered, signed a waiver, incriminated himself on film, and the state subpoenaed the tape. TV crew wasn’t a state agent, and there’s no violation. This is a delay tactic. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@FrankBednarz @webbystlbirds Correct. Also don’t want people to harass the lawyer, who has fewer followers than me. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Natesfault No one’s right to counsel was violated. TV crew comes in and says we want to speak to prisoners, prisoner says he wants to be filmed and signs a waiver, state subpoenas the tape. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@CreatedInTheD @zombie_esq @mckeds No. That isn’t what happened. Read the case, not your imaginary version of it. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Salviaplath94 @mckeds There was no constitutional violation here. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@whowhatnow56 @mckeds Please identify the case in the last seventeen years where I defended a corporation in court. Have two cert petitions being opposed by class action defendants as we speak. You’re the one siding with the frivolous claim of an armed sociopath over a wheelchair-bound woman. — PolitiTweet.org