(((tedfrank)))

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@pruett_collin Too many GOP politicians tried too hard to prove Democrats' scare stories correct, and promised prosecutions for crossing state lines, or to outlaw abortion without rape and incest exceptions, or to have federal overrides of state laws protecting abortion. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@pruett_collin Disagree. Reason Dems pushed issue & GOP didn't is because overturning Roe was unpopular (if only because voters widely misunderstood "overturning Roe"). Spending $ to explain Dobbs is a bad idea: if you're explaining, you're losing, & there was bad message discipline. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@RobPeck888 One would expect ex ante that smaller officers both (1) more often face suspects who think that resisting arrest is a viable strategy and (2) have to resort to weapons to defend themselves earlier in an altercation. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

The two responding officers weighed 290 pounds combined, compared to the 280-pound Dorsey, who had already hospitalized a security guard at the fitness center, which had to call 911 three times as Dorsey yelled and threatened staff and members. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

https://t.co/F6m3a20g2B — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@gtrswhiskeyguns @Not_the_Bee Again, that’s not what they ruled. It was a simple denial of the petition, and two justices wrote separately to point out that the father’s complaint was legally baseless because he already had a binding injunction that the mother agreed not to evade. https://t.co/lLaRODv9eu — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@blahblahblah9tn That’s the @AnnCoulter theory. LAPD decided officers should’ve called for backup, and I presume that’s what the suit is based on. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

The 5’1” officer, responding to a 911 call about a naked man causing a disturbance, shot the 6’1” 280-lb Dorsey as he was repeatedly punching a 5’5” female cop in the head as she lay helpless on the ground after tasing Dorsey when he resisted arrest. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@catboots_ @Not_the_Bee Read the judicial opinions. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Tonulukk @Not_the_Bee That fact isn’t a fact. The mother agreed to be enjoined against giving the drugs and promised the Texas Supreme Court she wouldn’t try to evade the injunction. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@CorruptBidens @Not_the_Bee The father took it this far after getting an injunction. California courts are bound to recognize the judgment, and there’s also judicial estoppel to boot. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@gtrswhiskeyguns @Not_the_Bee California doesn’t have the constitutional power to disregard that order (and it would also violate California’s Family Code to do so). But if you think California courts are going to unconstitutionally ignore a Texas court order, what difference would a SCOTX ruling make? — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

18 months later, whatever happened with this? — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @richardosman: 'Sweet Dreams' by Eurythmics was released closer to the end of the Second World War than to today. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@DaveC000 @Not_the_Bee Blocking you as illiterate. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@DaveC000 @Not_the_Bee When did you stop beating your wife? Learn how to read: I didn’t defend children being castrated. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@TheDuke6989 @Not_the_Bee Learn how to read. There’s already an injunction against mutilation. A pathological liar is manipulating you with a phony story. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Sir_Farticus @Not_the_Bee Learn how to read. The headline is fake news. No one is getting chemically castrated. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@gtrswhiskeyguns @Not_the_Bee The court didn’t rule that it lacked the authority. Read the opinion. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@MaloneyG15 @Not_the_Bee Learn how to read. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@watercup2022 @Not_the_Bee Learn how to read. Nothing is happening to the kids’ genitalia unless the father agrees to it. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@gtrswhiskeyguns @Not_the_Bee That’s not what happened either. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@potatospectrum @Not_the_Bee Learn how to read. There’s an injunction against chemical castration. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@sons_addy @Not_the_Bee He’s not the victim here, and the headline is false. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@DaveC000 @Not_the_Bee Learn how to read. No one is getting castrated. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@JJordan2215 @Not_the_Bee No one is getting castrated, chemically or otherwise. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@MaloneyG15 @Not_the_Bee I read the judicial opinions and you didn’t. The headline is fake news. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@CorruptBidens @Not_the_Bee The fact that there’s an injunction against chemical castration without his permission doesn’t matter when it contradicts the headline? — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@JoeFarnsworth8 @Not_the_Bee No. Because he didn’t lose. He has both an injunction and an agreement from the mom not to evade the injunction. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Not_the_Bee You left out a hell of a lot in the story, including how mom got the marriage annulled bc dad is a conman who scammed her, hasn’t visited his kids in a year, and how mom agreed to an injunction forbidding her from engaging in chemical castration without the father’s permission. — PolitiTweet.org