Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 67 of 307.
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
@nsarwark That’s a very intellectually dishonest characterization, as I note in the thread and you fail to address. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
Friedman ranked possibilities: 1) Free movement, no welfare state. 2) Welfare state, restrict benefits to legal i… https://t.co/FCo81uVJJV
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
This is a brilliant marketing campaign to make me buy a game I don’t have time to play. — PolitiTweet.org
Brianna Wu @BriannaWu
Hogwarts Legacy isn’t a game. It’s a character test. And a lot of people are about fail it.
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
@nsarwark @wendigo143 How many refugees and homeless are living in your house now? Or are you just proposing to spend other people’s money by force? Very libertarian of you. How much of a tax increase are you willing to bear to pay for the trillions open borders would cost? — PolitiTweet.org
Nicholas Sarwark @nsarwark
@wendigo143 @tedfrank Protecting individual human rights has costs. It's still the right thing to do.
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
https://t.co/WDDUJaI0nx “Illegal immigration is only good if it’s illegal.” Because of Plyler, Wong Kim Ark, EMTALA, and a number of state laws, illegal immigrants qualify for govt benefits, therefore illegal immigration isn’t illegal, and Friedman would agree it’s not good. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
@aeschulman *Wong Kim Ark. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
@aeschulman Plyler v Doe. Wing Kim Ark. Legislatively, EMTALA, etc. Other state laws and state constitutional decisions giving government benefits to illegal immigrants. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
@aeschulman Plyler v Doe. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
In the US, possibility #1 is politically infeasible. Possibility #2 is foreclosed by SCOTUS rulings and federal law, as well as being politically infeasible. That leaves possibility #3, enforcement of immigration law as superior to open borders plus welfare state. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
Friedman ranked possibilities: 1) Free movement, no welfare state. 2) Welfare state, restrict benefits to legal i… https://t.co/FCo81uVJJV
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
In the US, possibility #1 is politically infeasible. Possibility #2 is foreclosed by SCOTUS rulings and federal law, as well as being politically infeasible. That leaves possibility #3, enforcement of immigration law as superior to open borders plus welfare state. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
Friedman ranked possibilities: 1) Free movement, no welfare state. 2) Welfare state, restrict benefits to legal immigrants and withhold from illegals without enforcement of immigration laws. 3) Welfare state, enforce immig. law. 4) Welfare state, give benefits to everyone. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
@aeschulman Yes, but he based that on misunderstanding that it would be legally and politically feasible to withhold welfare state benefits from illegal aliens. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
@nsarwark No, I don’t. Free movement of people in a nation with a welfare state is disastrous, as Friedman correctly noted, and it’s politically (and currently in US legally) untenable to not extend the welfare state to illegal immigrants, which was MF’s second-best solution. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
@VolokhSpeech IF it’s required to be mentioned in every scheduling order to avoid traps for unwary, then work doesn’t expand to regularly file briefs at 11:45 PM, and it’s more humane for attorneys. 25 years ago, briefs had to physically stamped before 5 pm. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
Milton Friedman would disagree. — PolitiTweet.org
Nicholas Sarwark @nsarwark
There is no libertarian argument for interfering with the free movement of a peaceful person. There are certainly… https://t.co/86S2jXmArS
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
Yes, the Eleventh Circuit already has a de facto rule that's before midnight because one has to logistically manage to get paper copies in the clerk's hands by the next day. #appellatetwitter https://t.co/ifNLwXku7a — PolitiTweet.org
Frank Bednarz 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 @FrankBednarz
@tedfrank The nightmare of inconsistent procedure already exists, so no problem there.
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
@charlesmurray I agree, but the ratio will be misleading when crime is going down. What does the data look like when it's prisoners per 100,000 adults? That should show the same effect without double-counting. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
@smmarotta I’d sign on to that rather than duplicating your effort. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
@charlesmurray Isn’t this necessarily going to be correlative? If crime goes down, the ratio will go up and vice versa, simply because prisoners will be a lagging variable. I agree about causation, but I’m not convinced this is a good way to demonstrate it because of the confounding math. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
It’s a good rule, and the only thing that needs to change is that a scheduling order should make clear that the deadline is 5 pm. Will submit comments to that effect. #AppellateTwitter — PolitiTweet.org
Bradley Girard @BradleySGirard
#AppellateTwitter, in case you missed it CA3 is proposing a rule that makes filings due at 5:00p.m. eastern. I unde… https://t.co/gAc2FIDbjc
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
RT @bdquinn: One of hint I've come away from talking to antivaxxers is that, if they knew how common heart attacks are and have always been… — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
RT @arawnsley: I don’t think I’m ready for the AI-generated “Muppets Take Fallujah” movie. I probably will never be. https://t.co/JUTc0KVKS… — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
Incarceration works. https://t.co/nfYcU0p43V — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
@AmySilverberg Glad it worked out with the student in your writing class. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
@MSarelson https://t.co/1kEIMJRE3o — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
@billjamesonline You had a great example with George Brett in one of the 1980s abstracts. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
So much for the Herman Cain 8-8-8 strategy. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
RT @Vincent_Ledvina: So I just walked out my front door and saw THIS! Wow. Literally got out of bed in my pajamas and threw on my boots 😂😂… — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
@bdomenech Is there any civil action on this? Are there going to be protests? Canada has time to change their mind on not appealing. Unimaginable with a black victim. — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
RT @FCDallas: We know a few guys that can kick the ball btw — PolitiTweet.org
(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank
Shades of Rick Ankiel. — PolitiTweet.org
