Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

"Content moderation" is the Orwellian euphemism which corporate journalists and liberals (excuse the redundancy) have created for the term "censorship." — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

Hilarious, predictable, pathetic: — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@leithliterary Maybe responsible journalists need more than 10 hours to publish articles that accurately describe a person's worldview and political ideology in detail. Sorry if journalism isn't like McDonald's where you get hungry, demand something, and it appears 5 minutes later. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@jbarro @semaforben @bariweiss Huge numbers e don't trust platforms that advocate and practice censorship, and for good reason: there's no way to know the writer is expressing their honest views as opposed to staying within the bounds of permissible thought set for them. All Substack writers benefit from that. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

In any event, it's an extremely safe bet that if this "person of interest" is in fact the lone attacker in Brooklyn, this story will disappear from the public discourse before you can bat an eye. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

If you watch the YouTube videos of the named "person of interest" in the Brooklyn subway shooting, you will be astonished at the huge gap between his actual dominant ideology and political worldview and how liberal corporate media outlets are describing it. Or maybe you won't be. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@SethAGinger I've despised censors like you for decades before I began publishing videos on Rumble. Also, my Rumble income is a small portion of my overall income so it seems unlikely they could get me to change what I think. But as I said, I've always regarded people like you as menaces. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@blackmarketwit I don't receive any paycheck from Peter Thiel. If you're talking about Rumble - where Thiel is a very recent minority investor - he has no control over what I say, pays me nothing, and the income I receive from Rumble is a small portion of my income. When was I pro-NATO? — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@netschonwerder If an alliance acts aggressively or offensively in wars then it's not a "defensive alliance." It's just like every other military alliance in history: sometimes it acts offensively and sometimes defensively. Calling it a "defensive alliance" means that its sole purpose. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

People are obviously free to regard NATO as the most benevolent and noble force in all of human history, but how can it still be referred to as a purely "defensive alliance" after its bombing campaigns in Yugoslavia and Libya? Which NATO members were being "defended" there? — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@SethAGinger You are the fascist and authoritarian avatar of intolerance that you think you're fighting. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@SethAGinger I think people like you - who want to harness oligarchical and state power to silence everyone who disagrees with you - are more dangerous than the people you want to censor. There was never a time when I thought otherwise. Reporting on state/monopolistic censorship is reporting. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@daviddiano Democrats often think that censorship is justified provided that they deem the banned views sufficiently upsetting. That's the point. That's what makes your party and political faction so authoritarian: an endless supply of excuses to justify oligarchical/state censorship. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@SethAGinger Stupid modern-day leftists think free speech is fascist and a union of state and oligarchical power to censor dissenting views is heroic. You are such a slave to state and corporate power that I'd be surprised if you don't have art on your bedroom wall with the Google logo. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

The last 5 years has seen a series of "crises" which were exploited to condition Westerners not just to accept but be grateful for state/corporate censorship: Russiagate, 1/6, COVID, now this war. No matter your views, this should be highly alarming: https://t.co/OoZp4769JU — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

The reason why even these small pockets of dissent must be censored is clear. The benefits from a proxy war in Ukraine are immense for numerous key power centers in DC. Hence no questioning can be permitted: too risky. https://t.co/MDPYbI1eop — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

This is an under-discussed fact. Big Tech censorship is not random but always aligned with US foreign policy and DC orthodoxy because monopolies like Google and Amazon have very close ties to the US security state. The censorship regime from them is always imposed with that goal. https://t.co/3Rpi0hKNfJ — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

Note: the censorship goes in one direction. Just as "disinformation" was fully permitted as long as it was devoted to propping up Dems and undermining Trump, lies and disinformation are permitted if it serves the NATO cause in Ukraine. Only"pro-Russian"voices are censored. https://t.co/PZRXZbguEv — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

Preventing populations from asking who benefits from a protracted proxy war in Ukraine, and who pays the price, is paramount. A closed propaganda system is vital to achieve that. That's what explains the unprecedented spate of state/corporate censorship in the West. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

Western Dissent from US/NATO Policy on Ukraine is Small, Yet the Censorship Campaign is Extreme https://t.co/OoZp4769JU — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@FaithRubPol Fascists famously for free speech and against state and oligarchical censorship. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

This is what needs to happen at all costs: https://t.co/UBK1atBpGr — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

It cannot be overstated: (a) how surreal and dangerous it is that the leaders of the campaign for greater censorship are "journalists" (i.e., employees of large media corporations) and (b) how vital it is to have free speech platforms resisting this coercion to censor: — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@NotMyLinkedIn You're literally a neo-Nazi, so I don't think you're in a position to throw around terms like that. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@NotMyLinkedIn I've never been paid any money by Fox, or CNN, or MSNBC for all the times I've appeared on any of those cable outlets. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@regalillest People have left the NYT for Substack, precisely because succeeding at Substack is a journalist's dream: you reach way more people, all of whom are your own personal and portable readership, for far greater compensation, and full editorial freedom. https://t.co/1j40W0xg8E — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@NotMyLinkedIn Yes, after 18 years at Fox, he suddenly had a crisis of conscience. Had nothing to do with the huge mountain of millions they tossed at him. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

Imagine leaving your extremely influential perch as host of Fox's Sunday news program in order to go to a CNN streaming service where you know that every time you speak, fewer than 10,000 people are listening. Small YouTubers are embarrassed by those numbers. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@thinkmoreBrazil @cirogomes Como vai a campanha presidencial de Moro? Muito bem? Assim como as condenações que ele impôs na Lava Jato? Tão bom quanto sua lucratividade com uma consultoria que representa as grandes empresas envolvidas na Lava Jato? Assim como seu ano como ministro da Justiça de Bolsonaro? — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

Is Gretchen Whitmer mad at the FBI for creating, organizing, financing and overseeing a plot to kidnap her? — PolitiTweet.org