Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@effphoto Há pessoas - inclusive na esquerda - que acham que Pepe é um teórico da conspiração mentiroso. Quero que ele seja ouvido. Isso pq não confio em bilionários norte-americanos para controlar os debates políticos brasileiros do jeito que você faz. https://t.co/rhSqvCLr9e — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@JeremyT_of_C You're in my replies talking about Jews. . . . hmmm. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@stuckwithafork You're not allowed to talk about billionaire influence on politics unless it's the Koch Brothers and Sheldon Adelson. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

A liberdade de expressão não é fascista. A censura é fascista. A liberdade da expressão não é imperialismo. Aplaudir os bilionários estrangeiros por controlar os debates do seu país é imperialismo. A censura sempre acabará engolindo não apenas seus inimigos, mas seus aliados.🤷‍♂️ — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

As pessoas que exigem censura por parte dos oligarcas tecnológicos norte-americanos e que expressam gratidão aos bilionários do Google e do Facebook por silenciarem seus inimigos brasileiros não têm o direito de reclamar quando seus camaradas ideológicos são silenciado também. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

RT @wyattreed13: Land of the free https://t.co/3bzYAW7h6R — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@SethAGinger @TheBigOldDog Ask Rachel Maddow, Chris Hayes, Michael Moore, Hasan Piker, the Lincoln Project scumbags, Cenk Ugyur, and a zillion RUSSIA-TOOK-OVER! authors how easy it is to get extremely rich by catering to left-liberal sensibilities. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

In which toxic underground David-Brock/Neera-Tanden lab was this hideous caricature cooked up? — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

This is the new "disinformation," "fact-checking" and "anti-extremism" industry: they choose neutral-and-benign sounding names, present them as "experts" to trash anything they can't control, always funded by US/NATO and Soros/Omidyar to control speech: https://t.co/Iy2S1BeIHq — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

When Rumble announced I along with others such as @TulsiGabbard was moving there, the WPost extensively quoted something called "the Institute for Strategic Dialogue" to trash Rumble. It's funded/partnered by Google, FB, US/NATO security services, etc. https://t.co/Ply19KnJCP https://t.co/mnHt8gFA4I — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

This isn't that far off from what is actually happening. Occasionally they create "fact-checking" groups with the most neutral and benign-sounding names (Center for Extremism Studies) that are always funded by the same western security state agencies and liberal billionaires. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@mhewlettWSJ Are you really so stupid that you think people won't notice that nobody said "most" mass shooters have this ideology, but instead you just completely fabricated that? — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@lpolgreen @semaforben @jbarro @bariweiss That would work better than Ben's idea. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@M_feeney Euphemisms can be preexisting words or phrases for something benign that are repurposed for something more malignant, or can be a newly created term to disguise the reality of something: https://t.co/9iM9GgQB8S — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@TheBigOldDog @SethAGinger That's the most ironic pat of the "grifter" claim. By far the easiest path to making huge money in media over the last 5 years was anti-Trump agitprop and Russiagate hysteria. Ask Lincoln Project. If I were motivated by $, that is the path I would have taken. It was right there. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@M_feeney Yes, there really is such a thing as "enhanced interrogation techniques" that fall short of torture. That doesn't preclude the fact that it was also an invented euphemism for torture. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@dlboardman @jbarro @semaforben @bariweiss All I can tell you is that the size of my audience on Substack is triple or quadruple what it was at The Intercept, where I was the most-read writer every year since its inception (except the last year when I left). True of many writers I know who went independent. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@sullydish @esaagar Yeah, it's a huge success story. But since she did it with standard anti-Trump and pro-DNC agitprop - just descriptive, not critical - it doesn't fit into the corporate media's demonization script for Substack (anti-trans bigots and racists!) so they ignore her. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

RT @HotlineJosh: Sign of the times: “As the midterm elections pick up, Democrats are calling for more police funding and attempting to co-o… — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@sullydish @esaagar It's very possible she has a million free subscribers - seriously doubt she has 1 million paid subscribers, but she's earning in excess of $3 million/year from Substack and maybe substantially more. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

RT @ajwimsatt: Here is @ggreenwald on FNC talking about Neocons getting cozy with the Biden administration. https://t.co/ClqSXaQ0Nw — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@dlboardman @jbarro @semaforben @bariweiss My own personal experience, the experience of many journalists I know, and consistent polling data all confirm that view: https://t.co/lxvSjiUFvy — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

🤷‍♂️ - When you only publish things you know your readers want to hear based on the homogenized ideology of your readership, such embarrassment is inevitable: https://t.co/tPBIe2ZgsJ — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

The Intercept published an article mocking FBI for believing this ideology exists and can lead to violence (headline: "The Strange Tale of the FBI’s Fictional 'Black Identity Extremism; Movement"). That's what happens when you "report" what's pleasing. https://t.co/bQHgcu6Y5c — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

RT @esaagar: By my count of the top 20 paid newsletters on Substack: 8 are establishment left, 2 are Never Trump, 4 are dissident left, 2 a… — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

RT @esaagar: The discourse never seems to reckon with the fact that mega Biden booster Heather Cox Richardson and two Never Trump publicati… — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@leithliterary Yes, I feel comfortable -- having watched hours of those YouTube videos -- posting the preliminary observation on Twitter that media descriptions of his ideology are deliberately misleading. That doesn't mean I have whipped up a fully researched, edited and fact-checked article. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@jbarro @semaforben @bariweiss I agree with you that little if any of Bari's thoughts fall outside the bounds of acceptable limits. That's why she got influential jobs with WSJ and NYT (though she had problems there) and hasn't been censored from social media. Still: many people only trust independent writers. — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

It's public knowledge that many writers who received large advances from Substack are neither white nor male, but the NYT printed the claim anyway that that's who gets advances because the goal of this article, as always, is to demonize any independent platform that won't censor: — PolitiTweet.org

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

- When we banned you for questioning the NATO role in and claims about Ukraine, that wasn't censorship. It was just "content moderation." - Oh, OK, great. Never mind then. https://t.co/n5WyEzTNG7 — PolitiTweet.org