Jeff Clark

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

This is a brilliant @elonmusk move to tax the politically left, fake orthodoxy of Twitter twits. It’s so “Chief twit”-like, @jonkarl @KeithOlbermann.😂🤣 (See, in one tweet, it’s possible to use “twit” both in its basic negative sense AND an ironic sense to apply to brilliance) — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

RT @Norm_Valz: @JeffClarkUS @elonmusk I had completely forgotten about the Drudgereport. It still exists.? — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

You have the journalistic ethics of Hearst and Pulitzer. Call it yellow journalism ethics. This reminds me of you hopping in when I retweeted someone who made a good point but that person had a typo error in their tweet. As I said, you’ve got a real instinct for the capillaries — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

2/3 Keith Olbermann may not see any nuance. But you are skilled at subtle knifings, like how you have portions of your Trump hatchet-job book talking about me, but You NEVER called or tried to reach me before attacking me. So you get the point, but you’re pretending not to. — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

1/3 If you can’t process that Musk can have some fun with himself with a bit off wordplay but Drudge can use the word in the sense of “no, you’re an actual ‘twit,’” and how the takeover is going shows that, then I can’t help you, Jonathan. — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

Not the sense in which Drudge means it Keith. Which is why I clipped in the context of Drudge’s obvious attacks on how the takeover is going. But what you weren’t gifted with is any ability to discern context or nuance. Which is why when I hear a clip from you you’re screaming. — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

Drudge has taken to calling @elonmusk a “Twit”, the “Chief Twit.” Musk, one of, if not the greatest businessman of our age. No Drudge, if that label applies to anyone, you should look in a mirror for how your site has fallen off a cliff since you sold out or changed your stripes https://t.co/BEKghO45SP — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

Chinese infiltration story #99, yet Don Beyer will likely in just a few days still be re-elected by the overwhelmingly blue voters of Arlington. This story reminiscent of course of Senator Feinstein having a Chinese spy gofer for 20 yrs under her nose. https://t.co/Q8bT7XD73D — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

RT @SenRonJohnson: Hearing Dr. Peter McCullough has been stripped of his medical certifications. On what basis did this occur? He has dedic… — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

Very interesting article about the evolution of what might be called “official conservatism” and how it evolved via a series of purges. https://t.co/LBNraI0rnQ — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

I’m part Lithuanian. Not a fan of the Russian Bear. Raised to be very wary of it. But I am a fan of Amer. First foreign policy, not the Cheneys’ military-industr. complex first approach. I’ve no doubt Dems would have howled if Bush had sent $50B+ abroad. https://t.co/LQXDrzztHP — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

Wonder if @RpsAgainstTrump has as many “Republicans” /cough/ as Lincoln Project. Fake If conservatives. had no principles they’d have a hundred groups too with names like Dems Against Inflation, … Wokism, … Biden, … the World Econ Forum, Dems in Favor of Border Control, etc. — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

RT @ync1994: @JeffClarkUS https://t.co/mJCYSoKXiK — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

Quite familiar with Sup. Ct. amicus practice. I’m also familiar with how that process gets gamed. My favorite Sup. Ct. amicus briefs are the ones filed in every env’tl case from a collection of past EPA Administrators. Always pro more regulation. You can set your watch to it. — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

Not a fan of mail-in ballots. Neither was President Carter originally. We should have in-person voting with strict ID requirements, paper ballots, no private funding like Zuckerbucks, equal numbers of observers from each party, and vote counting required to be completed same day — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

I don’t think you can process the text of the Constitution, Richard. Kind of like garlic to the vampire. Monitor Moore v Harper re the independent state legislature doctrine. You may disagree but the argument there is surely colorable (and much more than that). It’s not “nuts.” — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

See, now you admit by conduct you’ve pitifully lost the debate. Last resort of scoundrels is ad hominem. Was content to debate with you a bit until you took the low road. Meet the block. Run for dog catcher next time. You will have a captive audience you can blare tirades to. — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

What did your “we” mean as to questioning the 2000 election, Richard? Just a Freudian slip? Did you hold your nose when you voted for Bush, knowing you’d need to vouch that to sneak in as the White House ethics czar? You’ve outed yourself. You can’t dodge your own admission. — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

3/3 To avoid further abasing yourself here to the true objects of your allegiance, don’t even try to argue that John Wood was minor.counsel. For those not following, he was Cheney’s lawyer on J6 Cmte. He tried to be a spoiler in a Senate race but gave up https://t.co/KpJMXntMBt — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

2/3 Then the public hearings were carefully scripted partial reveals of the secret testimony + tall-tale spinners like Cassidy Hutchinson + audience appearances by Sean Penn, raised by a Communist, et al. You’d be right at home with a despotic English monarch or the Stasi, Rich. — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

1/3 Amazing to see a lawyer endorse/believe a one-sided Committee process that collected all testimony in a Star Chamber secret process, allowing no minority counsel to have equal time, and allowing no cross examination. — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

+1 Supposedly you were a Republican until 2018? By referring to yourself as a “we” with Democrats questioning the 2020 election, you’ve just outed yourself as a bald-faced liar. A pretend Republican all along. Repubs don’t hook up with CREW and the Labor Party. — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

You were a Bush appointee. Clearly that was infiltration. I like your “we” admission. You count yourself among the “we,” who questioned the 2000 election. Yet you accepted an appointment in an Admin you were part of the “we” questioning the legitimacy of? I see. No principles. — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

RT @RWPUSA: We disagreed about the 2000 election (over 400 votes in Fla., not thousands of votes in several states), but still there was no… — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

This is a lie. I question your ability to read. But Left doesn’t believe in written law. They add to text of the Constitution, ignore textual provisions, or badly twist others. Same with statutes. It’s all about naked power and outcomes over faithful interpretation. Sophistry. — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

This is silly. Just playing your part in a wrap-up smear. Yrs ago, I met you at a libertarian conference. You seemed reasonable. Maybe something happened to you like Cheney’s plunge off the deep end. Maybe you were infiltrating. Now you’re just one of MSNBC’s stable of leftists — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

Such a woman of integrity that she laughed along with Jaime Raskin that he wrote a book alleging her father and George Bush stole the 2000 election. What consistency. What principles. What courage. I stand in awe of the integrity she displays re Raskin. https://t.co/2vSH0u6e0J — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

@HollyMac Yes, you’re right Cheney has every 1st Amend right to endorse Dems, start her own PAC as political speech, be a whiny finger wagger, etc. But at no point did I argue to the contrary. More important, she’s shown her true colors as a neocon warmonger first, not a conservative. — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

RT @DanielRStreet1: @JeffClarkUS Dems objected to the certification of the 2004 election also. But if the Dems do it that is GREAT. Challen… — PolitiTweet.org

Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS

It’s really telling when a former US Attorney thinks muted profanity is an actual argument. Liz Cheney has led a sanctimonious, walking-talking due process violating Cmte for months. WY tossed her out of Cong. Won’t be silenced with ad hominems, Preet. And clean up your language — PolitiTweet.org