Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet interface.

Showing page 60 of 1543.

Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@TShampling IMHO The Atlantic has published many good things on Trump and many good things in general but happy to agree RE the flaws of racial essentialism among Democrats — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@BrianEdwardMKE @imyourmoderator A rise in all cause mortality gives me pause. I am worried that murder is up, that overdoses are up, that car crashes are up, etc. I worry that lockdowns caused some of this. Evidence of all cause mortality being higher among vaxxed than unvaxxed would worry me but I've seen none — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@TShampling I certainly agree that there is real overlap. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@RhetoricLReince How is that not an accurate characterization of Twitter explicitly saying that it violates their rules and must be removed? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@imyourmoderator @BrianEdwardMKE Your erroneous presumption that I will dismiss anything you link out of hand, rather than reading and evaluating the evidence presented, is the obstacle here. And only you have the power to eliminate it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@BrianEdwardMKE @imyourmoderator Are you saying merely that *all cause* is up or are you saying that *all cause among vaxxed* is up more than *all cause among unvaxxed*? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@TShampling I agree. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@imyourmoderator @BrianEdwardMKE So the best evidence against my position does not exist anywhere in electronic form, but is only accessible in voice conversation with you? I am skeptical of that. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@GoonShyRyan @nytdavidbrooks You pointed it out! — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@TShampling Fair enough, but a slight misreading of your meaning and responding to it is not condescending, just a slight misreading and responding to it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@imyourmoderator @BrianEdwardMKE Is there a link you can offer to the place where I can find the best argument against my position? A PDF you can email me? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@SDane8 @imyourmoderator Is there a specific article there that you're alluding to? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@TShampling If I erroneously presumed that we disagree where we don't, my apologies, but at this point I can't tell what your view is. And I am trying to engage you, not condescend to you. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@BrianEdwardMKE @imyourmoderator No, I am not denying that. I am saying that you and Bret Weinstein and many others can and do question the efficacy of vaccines, and that I have consumed many such arguments and found them unpersuasive, rather than never having been exposed to them because one "can't" say them. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@JeremyM72014840 It isn't arbitrary when it always goes in one direction. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@BrianEdwardMKE @imyourmoderator You are questioning it right now, Brian. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@TShampling I don't think there was anything uncharitable about my reading or my response. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@imyourmoderator @BrianEdwardMKE Cut the bullshit. I didn't ask you to cite The Authoritative Source for your claims about cancer. I asked you to cite *any* source so I could read it. And you declined to do so. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@TShampling Here are my last 20 articles https://t.co/JS1A9wVZKK One of them mentions Donald Trump. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

Whatever one thinks of the merits of this person's perspective on their own experience with gender dysphoria, it seems highly objectionable to declare it unsayable on this platform. — PolitiTweet.org

Watson @ImWatson91

@gmpariseau I appealed, as the tweet clearly isn't hateful, but they rejected it anyway: https://t.co/sK5L7AsbjL

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@TShampling When you say "their party is *the* party of" you raised the question of the other party, not me. So we agree about the flaws of Democrats, and no, not everything need be about Trump, but if you can't see the racecraft and identitarian aspects of the GOP, you should try to — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@imyourmoderator https://t.co/9uRxoLE5ix — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@TShampling Of course Donald Trump also views race in this way, so it isn't as if the other party isn't a party of regressive identitarianism... — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@imyourmoderator I have spent a long time today interacting with you, a person who disagrees with me, and imploring you to link evidence to your claims so that I can learn if there is any basis for them, but you refuse to provide evidence. So it seems like you, not this site, is the obstacle. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@imyourmoderator it would lay the foundation for a potentially fruitful conversation. (Note that I have asked for links to evidence that would better help me to know the foundation for your beliefs, but you have refused to provide any.) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@imyourmoderator If I take the time for a phone call with a stranger I want it to be constructive. At present, we have so wide a chasm in our modes of engaging that it would not be constructive. That book, however, lays out my priors better than I could. In other words, — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

What does raising the salience of race do? "You don’t get a righteous struggle against oppression. You get a bunch of people who assume that public life is a brutal struggle of group against group, and who are probably going to develop derogatory views of people in rival groups." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@imyourmoderator Recommending a book to someone is neither condescending nor a favor to the recommender. The book is excellent and would benefit anyone who read it. I learned from it myself and so would you. Stop being so quick to take offense. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@imyourmoderator If you read this book I will have a phone conversation with you about it https://t.co/hwC8rHsMid — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

.@nytdavidbrooks on the L.A. politicos recording: "Their first assumption was that America is divided into monolithic racial blocs. The world they take for granted is not a world of persons; it’s a world of rigid racial categories." https://t.co/FgclemewNl Yep. Let's end that. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2022