Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 35 of 1543.
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
RT @NBA: The end of regulation in Lakers vs. Sixers was WILD đ˛ https://t.co/3RhRWa0iq4 — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@izzy_diab I think the risk of ideological capture will be somewhat lower due to more ideological variance between owner and upper management and that the ideological capture that does happen will be in a different direction than the site's elite users — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@izzy_diab Watch new owner change policies is exactly what is going to happen. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@sivavaid @nytimes The premise that you can reliably judge people on this platform by whatever Tweet of theirs you find dumbest, extrapolating to the rest of their life based on it, is unsound. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@KI7BDA @AlFromTehBlock Where is the evidence that they are expected to do that? — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@NGrossman81 That is not what that tweet says — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@ijbailey This tweet makes no sense. We agree that this story is less important than Watergate. Comparing the two by saying Watergate was more important is totally unobjectionable. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
A holiday gift guide for home bartenders by @petersuderman https://t.co/1M2Ab7GPpF — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
In 2018 I urged Twitter to ban all sitting world leaders from the platform. https://t.co/voXR68QbHM I still think that's a good idea. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
It's incredible, in an industry that mostly publishes articles that incrementally increase understanding of marginally important stories, to see reporting mocked and denounced because it isn't as important as Watergate and comprehensive at the start in a way Watergate wasn't — PolitiTweet.org
Damon Linker @DamonLinker
The "Twitter Files" have done more than anything in a while to make me feel like a homeless centrist. My TL is fill⌠https://t.co/v5AWsu0cUc
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@ijbailey @CathyYoung63 You think that book is such that there are no words that could legitimately criticize it? — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@danozzi If a content moderator flagged you for misinformation for labeling people who aren't fascists as fascists how would you respond? — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@JDHaltigan Seems like a reasonable reaction — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
In service of the narrative that the old Twitter regime was moral and responsible while the new Twitter regime is not, many journalists have overlooked relevant context, failed to engage obvious counterarguments, and revealed their own double standards. https://t.co/koUDx8FSVM — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@danielwinlander @ijbailey This is different in that Musk owns Twitter but leaker dictating where a thing is published is not as different as you're making it out to be — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@danielwinlander @ijbailey It seems to me that leakers often choose journalists precisely because they want the information to be published first in a specific outlet, and that if the (say) NYT journalist said "I'm going to post it on Instagram instead" they'd give the story to someone else — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@ijbailey @CathyYoung63 Perhaps if you suggest a superior alternative it will catch on instead — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
I've been waiting a long time to see who would be smart enough to snap up @coldxman — PolitiTweet.org
Coleman Hughes @coldxman
Very excited to announce that I'm joining The Free Press as a contributing writer! @TheFP @bariweiss https://t.co/c7GQYZGMux
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
RT @AliceFromQueens: No, itâs not ânewsâ to me that most people are incurious and complacent about the opaque factors that structure their⌠— PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@ijbailey @thomaschattwill I suspect it was understood that he would publish at the newspaper where he worked. As I understand it, *publish on Twitter first* is the only condition. That seems to give the journos involved lots of freedom re comprehensiveness & I expect to see lots more info over time — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@ijbailey @thomaschattwill For the same reason the Obama administration sometimes went to Ezra Klein for scoops on the Affordable Care Act. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@ijbailey @IonaItalia It is much more transparent than pre Musk Twitter and seems ethical to me — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@bendreyfuss I won't know what I think of the coverage decisions for sure till they all come out, but I think adding this much specificity to the debate about shadow banning, however defined, may well be among the most clarifying and therefore newsworthy things that are uncovered. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@TedBrogan2 @Wraith978 @bendreyfuss @michaelbd Twitter motte and bailey'd I'm a highly misleading way — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@bendreyfuss I think you may be significantly overestimating the state of public knowledge and clarity about content moderation practices because you did it professionally. IMHO the average reader of Bari's thread is learning a lot. I myself have new clarity on some things — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
The answer is yes https://t.co/KqnjSrFNl3 — PolitiTweet.org
Marc Andreessen @pmarca
The Big Question is, has any arm of the US government been illegally and unconstitutionally outsourcing violations⌠https://t.co/Ar4aBSXalf
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
This would be an excellent improvement. — PolitiTweet.org
Elon Musk @elonmusk
Twitter is working on a software update that will show your true account status, so you know clearly if youâve been⌠https://t.co/eTkCySLqYw
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@bendreyfuss @michaelbd And Twitter responded, in effect, *no, we're not making it so your Tweets are invisible to everyone but you, your followers can go to your timeline and see them!* — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
It's not entirely implausible. Imagine of Twitter had throttled the reach of all accounts that championed *defund the police*. Would that have helped or hurt the electoral prospects of Democrats? I can imagine it going either way — PolitiTweet.org
Jeryl Bier @JerylBier
If I understand correctly, shadowbanning helped Republicans because Twitter helped suppress the nuttiest ravings of⌠https://t.co/9IDciMmvYw
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@bendreyfuss @michaelbd The problem is that the vast majority of people who complained about "shadow banning" were objecting to something other than the way Twitter defined it in that blog post. They were saying, in essence, you're throttling the reach of my Tweets because of your ideological bias. — PolitiTweet.org
