Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet interface.

Showing page 349 of 1543.

Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@noUpside @micsolana @kimmaicutler I disagree that it's never been taken seriously before. Human rights law provisions and vaccine exemptions in multiple polities point to it being taken seriously, though there is, I hasten to add, a very strong case for vaccine mandates too. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@IsaLeeWolf It isn't clear to me as a vaccinated person to what degree the unvaccinated increase my risk of getting serious Covid. It's one bit of info that will shape my ultimate view on this. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@AmandaMarcotte I can see that argument, and it's definitely a liberal position, though I wouldn't say "the." Different folks reason differently on the same sides of both issues. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@themattylee @JillFilipovic @badler Yes, and that distinction could prove decisive. Then again, the certainty of ending a fetal life versus the uncertainty of an unvaccinated person contracting and spreading Covid cuts in the other direction. I'm not arguing for how courts should or would rule. I don't know. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@Dmurphyryan I am extremely pro vaccination. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@JillFilipovic @badler I suspect that opponents of a mandate will make the case that the privacy interest outweighs the public health interest and the proponents of the mandate the opposite. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@JillFilipovic @badler Not at all, and I'm going to go reread Roe now. I recall it finding a right of privacy, though not an unconstrained one, given it's finding of a state interest in protecting prenatal life. The question would be how privacy vs protection of life would be balanced wrt a vaccine, & — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@thormaster111 Vaccine or insurance could handle that. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@mattyglesias @bdomenech Thanks will read — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@annamerlan It seems to me that the 1905 and on vaccine precedents are in tension with the 1970s and on medical privacy precedents. Maybe I'm wrong but I am not just randomly musing on them, they appear to be the two most significant things SCOTUS could decide in the near future — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@davidbix Very normal way to converse, David — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@noUpside @doritmi Thanks! — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@colinwoodesq @noUpside @micsolana @kimmaicutler Time for me to reread all these — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

(Some people raise variants as a reason to mandate vaccines. Is there anything to that or not? And does the much higher number of global non-vaccinated render that effectively moot? Or not? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@tcddoyle @kimmaicutler Because Roe is largely about a right to privacy in medical decisions. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@noUpside @micsolana @kimmaicutler Yes, it seems very thorny with lots of tensions to me. How does one measure the certainty of killing a fetus against the higher probability of being a conduit for a virus that spreads via super spreaders and kills (I don't know exactly) percent of people infected? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@annamerlan It isn't clear that distinction resolves the tension with the logic of Roe. At least not to me, but perhaps you have thoughts on that I'm not seeing? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@zfurnas If it's airlines doing it I think that's different than the government doing it. If I owned an airline, I would mandate it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@noUpside @micsolana @kimmaicutler As someone with libertarian inclinations, it seems to me that the privacy logic of Roe should be applied to many other issues by those who believe in it, but I think that there is much inconsistency because people like the results more than the reasoning. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

1) What's the closest we can come to quantifying the risk an unvaccinated person poses to a vaccinated person? 2) How many people can't be vaccinated for medical reasons and what does their risk calculus look like with and without the mandate? Probably other questions too... — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

I'm quite conflicted about vaccine mandates. In favor for doctors and nurses, military personnel and others. And I believe private companies have a right to require them and that many should. (Airlines are one example.) But for what Biden is suggesting I have these questions: — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@badler Obviously. Will that distinction prove decisive in a privacy analysis of the penumbras of the 14th amendment? That isn't clear to me. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@skidoosh10 They are obviously different in many ways, and I am quite conflicted about both — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@thormaster111 I was referring to the logic of Roe which is rooted in a right to privacy that is at the very least in tension with vaccine mandates. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@fighting_wxrds How do you verify vaccination if not by intruding into private medical matters? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@kimmaicutler Do you not see any tension with the logic of Roe? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@SciencePartisan @rasmansa @AlanLevinovitz @kmele @NewLiberalsPod There's no hypocrisy. I don't think people should deliberately be mean, myself included. I haven't been absolutely perfect in my life at meeting that difficult standard; it is not hypocrisy to believe it is the right standard to aspire to — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

Evidently we're going to have a debate about vaccine mandates and abortion at the same time--that is, both culture war tribes are simultaneously going to take both positions on the rights to medical privacy and "my body my choice" autonomy — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@AdamSerwer It's not so far off from an actual Black Mirror episode. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@SciencePartisan @AlanLevinovitz @rasmansa @kmele @NewLiberalsPod These are the definitions I'm working with. https://t.co/rUGlhB0YCJ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2021