Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 11 of 1543.
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@StephenPiment What is this from? — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad @RottenInDenmark You offered no citation! — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@jaycaspiankang @gyc It would be very good for America if that message won over the MAGA right but I fear any backbencher with a fear-mongering spot about a "foreign invasion" at the border would quickly defeat e pluribus unum vibes with xenophobia — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
Really enjoyed this Conversations with Coleman roundtable https://t.co/Eg62dyzMwK — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
RT @Noahpinion: The U.S. can't build housing. Or transit. Or solar power. Or transmission lines. Or semiconductor fabs. We are the Build-… — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@Newyorkist @CoreyAtad You said he had cited things where he could but you can't give even one example? — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@Newyorkist @CoreyAtad Where was even one citation? — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
What the owner of Fox News thinks about whether some Fox News hosts endorsed obvious falsehoods https://t.co/wvJweEyfHy — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad You can only do this so many times to so many people before everyone starts to discern how reliant you are on vacuous bluster and insults and to stop imagining the fog machine of your rhetoric evidences any fire. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad It has attributes I've come to expect from you: performatively nasty, utterly ungrounded in evidence, evidencing a willingness to frivolously engage in character assassination, and betraying lots of dubious assumptions about how media works that you're unaware of. The thing is: — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@professorshih If structural racism is "policies and practices of social institutions... that clearly discriminate on the basis of race," isn't it possible Hollywood studios today are not structurally racist but that people working within them still sometimes experience interpersonal racism? — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@professorshih That makes sense to me, it's the definition I wish everyone used. What social institutions do you regard as structurally racist today? — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@professorshih When you say "structural racism" how are you defining it? I find different people use that phrase to mean distinct things — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
Say that Pres. Obama, then the country's most powerful man, encountered an elderly, homeless white amputee who saw his skin color and hurled a racial slur at him. To most, that would be a clear example of racism. This "bias + power" formula is interesting but not descriptive. — PolitiTweet.org
Rev. Dr. Jacqui Lewis @RevJacquiLewis
For those who need a refresher: Racism is bias + power. That's why "reverse racism" is a lie. It's the structural… https://t.co/9ky7WhFhwq
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad It is to your great discredit that you believe that Tweet vindicates the charge "when the government of Canada expanded its human rights protections to include gender identity, you took the side of an outright bigot who lied about the nature of the legislation." Staggering. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad I'm sure you'll try to invoke those imaginary volumes to justify some other tendentious attack in the near future. Meanwhile, goodnight. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad You just toss off the most inflammatory possible characterizations without a care for whether they are rigorous or true, and then you act aggrieved that the person you're smearing won't answer your -change-the-subject questions. It's really incredible. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad and then I said that I would write about it but never did. Who knows if that is correct, what with your faulty memory and penchant for frivolous smears, but regardless, *it's a wildly different claim* — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad See, before you claimed, "when the government of Canada expanded its human rights protections to include gender identity, you took the side of an outright bigot who lied about the nature of the legislation." Now, you are making a different claim: that you told me about c16, — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad As I said, I'll be happy to answer your questions when you answer mine. What is the citation for your claim? Alternatively, you could acknowledge the claim has no basis in fact and withdraw it, and we could move on. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad I cannot recall writing anything on C16. Perhaps I did and I have forgotten, but Googling, this is what I find on Jordan Peterson https://t.co/VRJHrq6CLs Do you always throw out inflammatory charges when you can't remember what they are based on or whether they are accurate? — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad My tweets do not delete, and all my Atlantic columns are on the Internet. Which column justifies your charge? — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad If you provide a citation that substantiates your last accusation, as I requested, I will be happy to continue engaging. But I am not going to engage if you keep jumping from unsubstantiated, overheated claim to unsubstantiated, overheated claim. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad I suspect that, much as you claimed I tweeted in error, and that countless people pointed it out, only to fall back on the weaker claim that you disagreed with me, you are being similarly careless with your charges here. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad You wrote "when the government of Canada expanded its human rights protections to include gender identity, you took the side of an outright bigot who lied about the nature of the legislation." I recall doing no such thing & don't generally find your claims trustworthy. So, where? — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad If you'd like to know the actual views of mine that informed my Tweets, you can find them here https://t.co/rmJRFiprLk and here https://t.co/ZkZC2U2EJ5 — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@XBillups @studentactivism I'd like to disaggregate some different questions here: 1) What do people mean when the… https://t.co/8klPyvW7DI
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad Citation, please. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad That you lack the capacity to comprehend fine distinctions or the project of making them to advance understanding of a complicated subject does not make me a troll, it makes you an inadequate interlocutor. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad No. I use that definition to clarify that, much as complaining about McCarthyism didn't mean one couldn't coherently oppose the Rosenberg trial, complaining about "cancel culture" doesn't mean one can't coherently oppose any instance of racist speech without contradiction. — PolitiTweet.org
Conor Friedersdorf @conor64
@CoreyAtad I have many opinions; that doesn't mean I am expressing them in every tweet. That isn't difficult to grasp, or shouldn't be. — PolitiTweet.org
