Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 396 of 4031.
David Weigel @daveweigel
What's the point of having a Marshall of the Supreme Court if he can't use his death penalty powers on leakers? — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
RT @natalie_allison: "I think our North Carolina Republican Party is being hijacked" by Club for Growth and "current and former members of… — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
RT @MCTuthill: @Gracie_Raw @daveweigel https://t.co/JfwGTUYgJU — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
RT @murderxbryan: Feeling bad for the justices in this troubling time — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
RT @kenklippenstein: Good lord https://t.co/ENLizy2rKx https://t.co/fDuK8lBqbl — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
RT @mkraju: Schumer says he will schedule a vote to “codify the right to an abortion in law.” But a similar bill got less than 50 votes in… — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
I agree with part of this, but if you want a total abortion ban, SCOTUS isn't delivering that. Your goal is a federal law. Read @CAKitchener: https://t.co/xxNs7PrQ32 https://t.co/14wNZKf3FX — PolitiTweet.org
Craig T @FuriousGiorge
The assumption that the filibuster acts as a brake on bad law is one of my least favorite Pundit Tropes. What it do… https://t.co/927xO7AoKV
David Weigel @daveweigel
RT @HotlineJosh: Here's statement from Sen. Sasse: In my early conversations with GOP operatives, a lot more focus on the *process* of thi… — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
RT @MattZeitlin: look sometimes i wish i could forget everything that's happened since 2015 but i can't, jealous of whatever neuralyzer the… — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
RT @mattyglesias: I have no idea who leaked the opinion but there have always only been two real possible outcomes at the Court: — Totall… — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
RT @Bencjacobs: @daveweigel There's an unlikely but not entirely insane scenario where control of the House in the lame duck comes down to… — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
So in #NY19 and #TX34, Dems have created two chances for Rs to flip seats and shrink Pelosi's majority. Political masterclass https://t.co/JkVvmqCtw5 — PolitiTweet.org
Justin Allen @JAllen_NYC
@daveweigel By law we are looking at a summer special election.
David Weigel @daveweigel
Obviously this is the fault of the "defund the police" movement, and maybe the Bernie Sanders campaign. Suggesting that moderate Dems are screwing over the party would be crazy. — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
Depending on if/when a special election is scheduled to replace Delgado in #NY19, Rs could pick up two Dem seats before November, reducing Pelosi's majority further. Rs already have a good shot at flipping #TX34, where Rep. Vela quit to become a lobbyist. — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
RT @dceiver: another fun fact: The Democrats ran someone named Sara Gideon against Collins in 2020, here is how they decided to deploy her… — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
New York Working Families Party criticizes the Delgado-to-LG move, via spox @ravi_mangla. "We’re deeply concerned about the implications for the House seat, especially in the wake of Roe. We should be doing all we can to preserve the House majority right now.” — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
@jamalraad There's some genuine disagreement among conservatives, though - leave it to the states versus ban it everywhere. Maybe the "sure, let California abort whoever" side loses the argument, but it's an argument. — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
RT @dilanesper: This, by the way, is also a good lesson for Sheriff Villanueva in LA. And it was a good lesson for Nixon. "Who leaked it?"… — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
@DonnyFerguson I'm seeing some "this could help Cisneros beat Cuellar" takes from people who have clearly never been to Laredo. — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
"Who leaked it" is a super interesting reporting question, and also something it's hard to imagine normal, human voters caring about. This isn't an electorate that gets angry about leaks, it wants to know stuff. https://t.co/glKGSDz6xh — PolitiTweet.org
Sam Youngman @samyoungman
Mitch is a coward. Too afraid to take ownership of what he’s done, he is hoping for a process story. It’ll probably… https://t.co/XGzSlgAAoV
David Weigel @daveweigel
RT @baseballcrank: Among other things, overturning Roe would end for good the national political aspirations of blue-state R GOVs & red-sta… — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
Indeed they did! There's no evidence yet that this helps Dems, it's all vibes and cope. https://t.co/pWhsTSsUEI — PolitiTweet.org
Nick Pappas 🌻 @NickAPappas
@daveweigel I recall you mentioning before that Texas Rs actually picked up D held seats in the state legislature f… https://t.co/VRTqkIn2o0
David Weigel @daveweigel
https://t.co/WKVhZ04Ymm https://t.co/OZUH6xfx14 — PolitiTweet.org
Manu Raju @mkraju
Susan Collins: “If this leaked draft opinion is the final decision and this reporting is accurate, it would be comp… https://t.co/IP0c64s8Um
David Weigel @daveweigel
Theory still holding up! Half my mentions are versions of "DO SOMETHING" as if Roe's fate wasn't sealed in 2016. https://t.co/4wuBGzv9MB — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
Pretty popular tweet, good for my theory that SCOTUS striking down or scaling back Roe won’t polarize voters like D… https://t.co/24iQ8aOhVt
David Weigel @daveweigel
RT @adamgoldmanNYT: The original Roe v. Wade decision also was leaked to the press https://t.co/VA78TPEP33 — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
I am once again asking you to look up the 2024 Senate map https://t.co/SKdXDU6V25 — PolitiTweet.org
Andy Barr @realAndyBarr
This is galaxy brain shit. Democrats should never be afraid to have an election be about reproductive rights; it is… https://t.co/v8NQ2AQg4e
David Weigel @daveweigel
But if there's no filibuster, or a carve-out for abortion, Rs can pass a federal abortion ban with 51 votes in 2025. Do Dems think they'd just blow up the filibuster to do this anyway? Does that change their risk assessment? Probably moot, they don't have 50+VP votes rn. — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
"Should Dems blow up the filibuster to codify Roe" is interesting strategic Q, even if it isn't likely. Rs have a clear path to a trifecta in 2025. With filibuster intact, they'd need 60 votes for a national abortion ban; post-Roe status quo keeps abortion legal in blue states. — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
RT @ggreenwald: Democrats control both houses of Congress and the White House. They of course have the power to establish a national right… — PolitiTweet.org
David Weigel @daveweigel
RT @hats_for_bats: @daveweigel You can't run on "theres nothing we can do" even if its the truth — PolitiTweet.org
