Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 61 of 190.
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
@AzamAnwarMD Next let’s see them withdraw from UNPRI, SASB, TCFD, Climate Action 100+, etc. And then we can take it seriously. — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
The two greatest concentrations of corporate power in human history: (1) BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard who coordinate to advance one political agenda, and (2) big tech companies who coordinate to silence one set of political viewpoints. Worst of all, they’re linked. — PolitiTweet.org
Heritage Foundation @Heritage
Meet ESG, three little letters that are hurting your bottom line 💸 @VivekGRamaswamy breaks down how some investmen… https://t.co/VpCo00vk51
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
@realmanofgenius @KurtSchlichter See my piece on exactly that point in WSJ: https://t.co/cZeiwYwgFX — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
If they want to be treated as private companies, then they need to behave like it: stop responding to government pressure. And Section 230(c)(2) should be an opt-in statute, with constitutional strings attached. — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
Facebook, Google, & Twitter should be bound by the First Amendment - period. They’re responding to carrots & sticks from the federal government to censor protected speech: if it’s state action in disguise, the Constitution applies. https://t.co/Y8mbbkIafv — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
Facebook, Google, & Twitter should be bound by the First Amendment - period. They’re responding to carrots & sticks from the federal government to censor protected speech: if it’s state action in disguise, the Constitution applies. https://t.co/Y5iOfIVIqD — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
RT @VivekGRamaswamy: Twitter didn’t simply engage in viewpoint discrimination. They lied about it and then tried to cover it up. That’s not… — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
The simplest definition of consumer fraud is: telling consumers you are doing one thing, when in fact you are doing the opposite. This is entirely separate from the constitutional state-action argument (and also much simpler). — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
@AmyPeikoff @MarioNawfal Happy to say a word about it, I’m on — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
@MarioNawfal What’s up guys — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
Twitter didn’t simply engage in viewpoint discrimination. They lied about it and then tried to cover it up. That’s not a good-faith mistake. It’s malicious and likely illegal. https://t.co/PKUEvrBOYq — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
@EliyyahSilva How do you request to be brought up? I can maybe join in a little bit. — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
@RandianJustice There’s great case law on this. Take a look at Brentwood for example. “Willful participation in a joint activity” with the government constitutes state action. So does responsiveness to inducements or threats. I’ve written extensively about the legal analysis. Check it out. — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
The idea that these were “private companies” simply enforcing their “terms of service” is a farce when they were working hand-in-glove with the federal government to censor constitutionally protected speech. Our Founding Fathers are doing backflips in their graves. — PolitiTweet.org
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
@ShellenbergerMD @bariweiss 20. This post about the Hunter Biden laptop situation shows that Roth not only met week… https://t.co/c2xBeNYVhQ
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
When I co-wrote this in Jan 2021, my goal was to warn against a grave constitutional violation. Instead the U.S. government and Silicon Valley interpreted it as a how-to guide: they colluded to do through the back door what government couldn’t do directly under the Constitution. — PolitiTweet.org
RexTwix @RexTwix
Relevant article to the conversation of the day. @VivekGRamaswamy https://t.co/TE6FZKzIgE
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
@DMC888333 @MsGraceyP This is also a great idea. Stay tuned on this issue…will have more to say before long. — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
Discussing this on air in 10 minutes with @foxandfriends. — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
@wormfriendly So far it looks like a fig leaf. The real issue is influence through shareholder engagement, not proxy voting. And even for proxy voting, they’ll need to abandon certain firmwide commitments they’ve actually made in order to do this…which CalPERS, etc., may not “let” them do. — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
Twitter execs lied about shadow banning, and Elon does a great public service by exposing it. But I’m confused by Elon’s own recent comments which seem to suggest that he plans to continue visibility filtering. “Freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach,” he said. This is odd. — PolitiTweet.org
Bari Weiss @bariweiss
9. “VF” refers to Twitter’s control over user visibility. It used VF to block searches of individual users; to limi… https://t.co/8uvOZtEblL
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
The CCP gave Apple nearly free labor via upstream suppliers. Apple wasn’t their customer; it was their product. BlackRock gave states nearly free index funds to invest in markets but taking their proxy votes for it. The states’ citizens weren’t the customer; they were the product — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
If you get something for free, it means you’re not the customer. You’re the product. That applies much more broadly than to internet companies. Think about it. — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
RT @jordanbpeterson: This is big deal. Are congratulations in order @VivekGRamaswamy at @StriveFunds ? If you don't know about @StriveFunds… — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
@TB12Posse Maybe, but that’s a separate point. — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
“Drexler says he and his team used several techniques to ensure their sequencing was as robust as possible. He says they are now re-checking their data carefully. “Should there have been a mistake despite all our precautions, we will handle this appropriately, of course.” — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
“I consider this the more likely explanation,” says Neher. “Given how rapidly Omicron spread once it entered the general population, it is unlikely that it had circulated for several months undetected across” Africa. — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
“An alternative explanation that needs further investigation is that samples containing very small amounts of Delta variant were contaminated with Omicron, says Darren Martin, a computational biologist at the University of Cape Town in South Africa.” — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
There’s now evidence to suggest that Omicron emerged from *lab contamination.* This is not a joke & it’s no mystery that public trust in science has cratered: imagine if the same people who invented cigarettes are now selling you their cure to lung cancer. https://t.co/AjfkbC2nLg — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
RT @VivekGRamaswamy: A “scope 3 emissions cap” does to Chevron what a “racial equity audit” does to Home Depot: harms its business interest… — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
“Equity Smash-&-Grab” might be even more accurate. — PolitiTweet.org
Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy
ESG = “Environmental Smash-&-Grab” (Of your money). — PolitiTweet.org
Dr Jordan B Peterson @jordanbpeterson
"mandatory ESG reporting" absolutely equals forced compliance with the radical leftist eco-fascist agenda (see… https://t.co/AselUHrDee