Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 39 of 153.
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@davemcclure No American president has ever claimed Ukraine to be a vital interest of the US. Even Biden stopped short of that in his State of the Union. This is why Biden refused the No Fly Zone and direct military involvement at the start of the war. To claim otherwise now is mission creep. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@davemcclure Try to remember what US policy was under Obama before your brain got infected with TDS. Obama refused to arm Ukraine because it “would provoke Moscow into a further escalation that could drag Washington into a proxy war.” Smart man, that Obama. https://t.co/14NUz696YT — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@davemcclure From TDS to WWIII is quite a leap. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
Here’s why we’re in a pickle: Biden does what the staff tells him. The staff does what the media tells them. The media does what the Twitter mob tells them. And the Twitter mob is a bunch of keyboard warriors who think they suffer no consequences for their virtue-signaling. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@davemcclure Why would I have needed to tweet about Ukraine before the US involved itself in a proxy war there? My whole point is that it’s not a vital interest of the US. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
Get your money out of paypal right now. — PolitiTweet.org
David Marcus @davidmarcus
It’s hard for me to openly criticize a company I used to love and gave so much to. But @PayPal’s new AUP goes again… https://t.co/Zq5Vh9miRi
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@BillAckman @Ukraine So what’s your plan if Putin detonates a tac nuke? — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@mtracey The American people ignore it because they understand that the disputed territories in eastern Ukraine are largely inconsequential to America. So they assume our leaders wouldn’t be stupid enough to get in a nuclear war over them. That’s the rub. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
How to know if you’re an easily propagandized chimp brain: you couldn’t find Ukraine on a map last year, you’ve never set foot on its soil, you can’t speak the language, but you’re willing to engage in nuclear war to defend its ethnically disputed border regions. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@aeyakovenko Yes of course it would. Everyone understands this. Especially now that Ukraine is trying to take back Crimea. https://t.co/7E6QGVQmJP — PolitiTweet.org
Clint Ehrlich @ClintEhrlich
The first option is not on the table. Putin has no power to turn the peninsula over to Ukraine. He would be brand… https://t.co/TQla8MZMIG
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@aeyakovenko Crimea, Donbas and Ossetia are ethnically Russian territories. They are also not part of NATO. I’m not saying that justifies his actions, just that it’s massive threat inflation to suggest that all of Europe is at risk. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@aeyakovenko Clearly he doesn’t have the capability for conquest, even if he had the desire. The only reason nukes are in play is because we’ve made the war existential for him. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@stogachess You obviously haven’t read any of my work on the subject. From April: https://t.co/4jKW82u3bx https://t.co/yho3pjqh3d — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@jgarzik @Noahpinion https://t.co/ozpJrQ7nr7 — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@iacobdm @Noahpinion https://t.co/ozpJrPQkp7 — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
RT @ClintEhrlich: THREAD: Today, a time for choosing arrived for America. A truck bomb has been detonated on the bridge that connects Cri… — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@Noahpinion It is not being “brought to our knees” to support a negotiated settlement based on the principle of self-determination for disputed territories that we have no vital interest in. We should have engaged in diplomacy before the war to avoid this situation. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
RT @liron: How US nuclear policy needs to face the present danger of the Ukraine war according to @Naval. A sober and scary wakeup call.… — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
RT @ClintEhrlich: The war in Ukraine has made Russia *less* likely than ever before to invade NATO states. Yet hawks act like Putin is Hi… — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
The world faces zero chance of conquest. Russia’s army barely functions beyond its immediate supply lines. The US is the most powerful nation in human history. Our only risk is being so wrapped up in our own sense of moral condemnation that we back Putin into a nuclear corner. — PolitiTweet.org
Noah Smith 🐇🇺🇦 @Noahpinion
No. If we must, we should fight WWIII to prevent the conquest of the world by brutal tyrants. Culture is only one p… https://t.co/IELWbprmU8
David Sacks @DavidSacks
Blue-checks think we should fight WWIII for “cultural trends.” — PolitiTweet.org
Noah Smith 🐇🇺🇦 @Noahpinion
Folks like @DavidSacks should understand that the free world isn't fighting for wokeness. Wokeness is just one (rec… https://t.co/VDvbeqtFnz
David Sacks @DavidSacks
RT @JohnAllenGay: Rhetoric like this has been floating around. It’s mistaken because it assumes all nuclear blackmail attempts are create… — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@Noahpinion Except for the people of Crimea. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@sfrantzman Sure, Ukraine has a right to self-defense, but if they want to do it with our money, weapons, training and intelligence, then we get a say too. And our own vital interest is to avoid further escalation of this war before it involves us. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
Whose “national security”? Certainly not the United States’s. — PolitiTweet.org
Adam Kinzinger #fella @AdamKinzinger
Evidently the Starlink system is down over the front lines of Ukraine. @elonmusk should make a statement about thi… https://t.co/nGnUZsgz2z
David Sacks @DavidSacks
RT @josh_hammer: "The U.S. Needs To Change Course Right Now in Ukraine." My syndictaed column for the week. https://t.co/9mC7obkWh7 — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
RT @theallinpod: E99! -- cheating scandals (chess, poker, fishing) -- $TWTR deal updates -- AI advancing rapidly & what the future holds -… — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@Avik Fixed it. Thx — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
Some of us non-experts were saying weeks ago that Putin is not bluffing, and that therefore US policy is on an unacceptably dangerous course. Thankfully Biden has accepted the former; now he just needs to accept the latter. https://t.co/ksScrpvpDt — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
Some of us non-experts were saying weeks ago that Putin is not bluffing, and that therefore US policy is on an acceptably dangerous course. Thankfully Biden has accepted the former; now he just needs to accept the latter. https://t.co/ksScrpvpDt — PolitiTweet.org
