Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 38 of 153.
David Sacks @DavidSacks
Since the World’s Greatest Moderator™️ forgot to ask about the most important issue in the world this week on @theallinpod, I went on @lochhead’s podcast to discuss Ukraine and President Biden’s “Armageddon” warning. Here’s our deep dive on that: https://t.co/DJZr5u7AP1 — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@AriDavidPaul @RoaringFujin @PeterMcCormack @theallinpod I’m describing a cultural dynamic. If you think this is ad hominem, you should spend 5 minutes in my notifs. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@Arturmaks @RadioFreeTom @TimothyDSnyder Look at their track records. Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya. These are not experts. Realism & Restraint, not The Atlantic, is the foreign policy school that got these decisions right, listen to them. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
The bombing of civilian centers, in retaliation for the bombing of the bridge, is an atrocity. The escalatory spiral will continue unless a negotiated settlement is reached, with nuclear use as an increasingly inevitable end point. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
RT @freddiesayers: Russia realists are being given the same moralistic treatment the lockdown sceptics received, argues @james_billot at @U… — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@AlteraPete @vkhosla The Russian naval base at Sevastopol has been there since 1783! It preexists Ukrainian independence or even the transfer of Crimea from Russia to Ukraine by the USSR. If Ukraine tries to take it by force, Moscow would consider it grounds for nuclear use. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
RT @onlyonecrypto: @DarcyBurner @DavidSacks https://t.co/uRzG8R3PWI — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
I have no Russian investors. Has anyone noticed that the pro-war side of this debate is a non-stop smear machine? — PolitiTweet.org
John L Davidson @HHIDavidson
Tellingly omits his investors. It is a small World https://t.co/GPKy9Venyg
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@vkhosla Russia has a huge naval base at Sevastopol that is home to the Black Sea fleet. Very unlikely they give that up and allow it to become a NATO base without resorting to nuclear use. Do you have a plan for that? — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
So dumb. I don’t have any business with Russia, or Ukraine for that matter. Now, who’s paying you to be pro-war? Defense contractors or Ukraine directly? Obviously a person can’t have a view without a pecuniary motive. — PolitiTweet.org
Darcy Burner🌻 @DarcyBurner
Wondering why venture investors like @davidsacks are oddly vocally antiwar re Ukraine? Their portfolios. Many (ma… https://t.co/hQlyhy1TDx
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@DarcyBurner So dumb. I don’t have any business with Russia, or Ukraine for that matter. Now, who’s paying you to be pro-war? Defense contractors or Ukraine directly? Obviously a person can’t have a view without a pecuniary motive. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@kimmaicutler Nice job with the oppo. I’m sure you’re very familiar with his work. Sachs wanted the US to provide economic assistance to Russia to avert the catastrophe. He left when his approach was rejected. Who knows if it would have worked but it’s hard to blame him when it wasn’t tried. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
All of you who fancy yourselves good liberals but keep braying for war need to listen to Prof Jeffrey Sachs, who has spent his life doing international development. He actually is a good liberal with first-hand knowledge of what’s happening. https://t.co/DcVc37sRcE — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@Austen @josh__wolff Gallup and German polling among other sources. https://t.co/UdZecCHbyi — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
“The U.S and European Union may want to save Crimeans from themselves. But the Crimeans are happy right where they are.” -Forbes, 2015. https://t.co/UdZecCHbyi — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@Russ_Wilcox 2015 is fresher data. https://t.co/UdZecCYeAi — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@MarcBodnick Yup. Wanting to avoid nuclear war is now an “extremist” view. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
I’m using the word Democracy to mean the right to self-determination. The vast majority of people in Crimea are Russian and would choose to go with Russia. It would escalate the war massively, while violating our own principles, to deny their right to self-determination. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@josh__wolff The vast majority of Crimea is Russian and wants to be part of Russia. If we support self-determination, we will allow that. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
Two very distinct phases to this war: 1. War for Democracy - defending Kiev. 2. War against Democracy - attacking Crimea. The US accomplished something with #1. It should not support #2. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@ZevinClark I said the opposite. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
Open your minds. Listen. — PolitiTweet.org
Elon Musk @elonmusk
@tegmark Nuclear war probability is rising rapidly
David Sacks @DavidSacks
LOL — PolitiTweet.org
Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC
“PayPal mafia” was supposed to be an endearing reference to the company’s alum—not a business plan. https://t.co/rfaAn5Gbag
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@BrendanCarrFCC LOL — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@drchethansathya @Jason @theallinpod This is not a conspiracy theory. It’s a cultural dynamic. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@davemcclure @triptepper If they’re willing to fight a nuclear war. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@davemcclure @triptepper I am NOT ridiculing people who have only recent interest in Ukraine. I am ridiculing people who have only recent interest in Ukraine AND want to fight a nuclear war on its behalf. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@davemcclure Puhlease. I see a far greater number of those types of accounts on the other side of this debate. Look at the hysteria when Elon floated a peace proposal. The bots were working overtime to shoot that down. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
@davemcclure Justifying broader wars on the basis of “domino theories” have a very poor historical track record. Unless of course you think Vietnam made sense. — PolitiTweet.org
David Sacks @DavidSacks
No American president has ever claimed Ukraine to be a vital interest of the US. Even Biden stopped short of that in his State of the Union. This is why Biden refused the No Fly Zone and direct military involvement at the start of the war. To claim otherwise now is mission creep. — PolitiTweet.org
Dave McClure @davemcclure
has to be most moronic, obviously untrue statement of the week. Sacks: “Ukraine isn’t a vital interest of the US”… https://t.co/5CbkYT58F3