David Sacks

David Sacks @DavidSacks

This war has absolutely nothing to do with NATO expansion, but under no circumstances can we give it up! This is actually the position of our State Department. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Panetta cites a 25% chance of nuclear use. Here’s a chilling scenario of how it could happen. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@AdamKinzinger You got a problem with Jewish names, Kinzinger, or are you just flexing for your new friends? — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

RT @WarOnTheRocks: Jeremy Shapiro presents a scenario of nuclear escalation https://t.co/aDsOjTsNwJ — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Even if Moscow rejects the proposal now, keeping it on the table creates an alternative to nuclear use if they become desperate, thereby reducing risk of nuclear war. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

If Moscow rejects, war goes on until Feb 23 lines reached. If Ukraine wants to keep fighting beyond that, they’re free to do so as a sovereign country, but without US weapons and support. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Concrete suggestion: US proposes an armistice based on Feb 23rd lines, along with a guarantee that Ukraine won’t become part of NATO. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@Noahpinion @Noahpinion would you be willing to support this? — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@mysteriouskat @paulg 1) Budapest Memorandum is not a defense treaty. 2) Perhaps Ukraine shouldn’t have given up their nukes (Mearsheimer advised them not to) but they didn’t have a choice. Besides, those were Soviet not Ukrainian nukes and the launch codes were in Moscow. https://t.co/HA3OijsQbX — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@paulg Of course I would fully support America. But Ukraine is not America. We have our own interests to think about, which include avoiding nuclear war with Russia. Do you not see a distinction between US and Ukraine in this conflict? — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@Noahpinion I think the main reason to float this proposal now is to give Moscow an alternative to using a nuke. If Putin believes that all of Crimea is at stake, then he may view nuclear use as his only option. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@Noahpinion Armistice based on February 23rd lines, along with a guarantee that Ukraine won’t become part of NATO, would be a good proposal to put on offer. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@Noahpinion Putin is worse than Stalin? — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

A US Congressman declaring “Country First” while proudly self-identifying as a member of a foreign propaganda organization (NAFO) which was founded by a neonazi. Can things get any crazier? https://t.co/KnJEkq3SHt — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

This is who you’ve hopped in bed with @AdamKinzinger. https://t.co/E3AYMqV7mg — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@paulg If the question here is: should Ukraine be free to defend its territory the way that any country (including the US) would defend its territory, the answer is sure. But that doesn’t justify why the US should become a co-belligerent. We have to consider our own vital interests. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Ukraine is not our 51st state. It’s not even a treaty ally. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@Noahpinion The red line could easily be before Crimea but it’s hard to see how Crimea wouldn’t be a red line given the Russian naval base there. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@paulg Ukraine is not our 51st state. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Eastern Ukraine is the new organizing principle of American foreign policy: — Venezuela becomes a friend. — Saudi Arabia becomes an enemy. — Europe freezes. — Global South starves. — US has a recession. All over a piece of real estate that has never been a vital US interest. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Important to note that the Budapest Memorandum does not require the US to defend Ukraine militarily. It’s not a defense treaty. It was not ratified by the US Senate (as treaties must be). This was all explained to Ukraine at the time by American negotiators. https://t.co/RhjLX6WIhi — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@jonofarcadia @AdamKinzinger Fluids! 🤣 — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@splinter8675309 @KennethParrott6 @JeffNeelzebubII Actually it’s highly relevant. https://t.co/atWN2g4WhW — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

This crying congressman thinks he’s a tough guy for advocating direct US involvement. He’s willing to fight WWIII for Ukraine. He self-identifies as “NAFO,” which is a foreign propaganda effort. Who do you work for, @AdamKinzinger, because it’s not the American people. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

This crying congressman thinks he’s a tough guy for advocating direct US involvement. He’s willing to get into WWIII for Ukraine. He self-identifies as “NAFO,” which is a foreign propaganda effort. Who do you work for, @AdamKinzinger, because it’s not the American people. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@BoredElonMusk Ukraine is a country. Obviously. The question is what’s in America’s interest. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@geoffwolfe @RadioFreeTom @dhnexon @JosephCBrandt1 I look at track record. If The Atlantic’s writers were judged based on theirs, they would be out of a job. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@aeyakovenko @DecryptSim Bush created that situation with the Bucharest Declaration. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@AdamKinzinger I didn’t bawl like a little baby at a congressional hearing. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@RadioFreeTom @dhnexon @JosephCBrandt1 What have you written that holds up so well after 8 years? — PolitiTweet.org