David Sacks

David Sacks @DavidSacks

“It’s not harassment but I’ll go away if you give me $50,000.” https://t.co/GZ7nQHvkLu — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@JoelKatz The rules allow the flights to be published on a delay. The real-time aspect serves no good purpose. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

As I've long argued, free speech on social networks does not mean “anything goes” but rather that categories of impermissible speech should be grounded in established concepts and case law. https://t.co/iOVxn34EB6 — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Real-time doxxing is illegal in California under Penal Code 653.2. It is not constitutionally protected speech. https://t.co/uXNbRUM4h2 — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@VitalikButerin I can agree with this as a general principle. For cases where real safety is involved (not just words), there’s a reason to move more expeditiously. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Interesting that the strongest result is for treating the corporate media the same as everyone else. I suspect this is why they’re acting so hysterically right now. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Final results: —> 72% say Twitter should not allow real-time doxxing. —> 71% say temporary account suspensions are a reasonable way to enforce the policy. —> 84% say the policy should be applied to corporate journalists the same as everyone else. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@craig1851 It was an existing policy and it only applies when you copy another user’s name and profile photo. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

As you probably don’t remember, the incident he’s referring to and still gaslighting about was the enforcement of an existing requirement that parody accounts have to identify themselves as such (to avoid impersonation). Only a hysteric could see this as a ban on comedy. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Comedy isn’t legal on Twitter? Please tell that to @TheBabylonBee. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

RT @ClayTravis: This is absolutely staggering to read. The @fbi had 80 agents monitoring @Twitter and was regularly demanding accounts, whi… — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

RT @mtaibbi: Instead of chasing child sex predators or terrorists, the FBI has agents — lots of them — analyzing and mass-flagging social m… — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

So the FAA gives Elon a new plane identifier (called ICAO) every month because of threats to his safety. But Sweeney wrote software to hack this privacy measure in order to continuously doxx him. How is this legal? — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

“I would rather be governed by the first 2,000 people in the telephone directory than by the Harvard University faculty.” -- William F. Buckley — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Postscript 2: As it turns out, Elon was using the FAA's privacy program (which anonymizes ICAO) but Sweeney hacked it. This only strengthens the doxxing argument against Sweeney because the info he's publishing is non-public. https://t.co/rbeY7VH585 — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@lopp Should have included the word "continuous." — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Should the policy apply to corporate journalists the same as everyone else? — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Are temporary account suspensions a reasonable way to enforce the policy? — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Should real-time doxxing be allowed on Twitter? — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@micsolana Worse than Atlas Shrugged. https://t.co/JP9Ga0yrcH — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

RT @theallinpod: E108 👀 -- doxing debate -- nuclear fusion breakthrough -- state of the markets -- startup valuation collapse -- what LPs… — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@jason_kint @elonmusk Curious which senators you plan on approaching. https://t.co/SRKQDX4bzV — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@EricNewcomer Sudden attack on his child would explain both. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@DDGZDY No, their claim was that hearing an opinion they didn’t like was a threat to their safety. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

The people who shrieked loudest that Elon would allow hate and safety threats on Twitter are now shrieking that he’s banned hate and safety threats on Twitter. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Elon’s content moderation decisions so far: - no swastikas - no continuous real-time doxxing What’s the problem? — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Postscript: Some people are trying to assert that I don’t think private planes should file flight plans or transmit ADS-B data. That is not true. If you want to get technical, I’m suggesting that the FAA shouldn’t publish ICAO addresses. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Of course, the MSM, which supports censorship in the name of “harm reduction” when their favored policies are criticized, sees no issue when actual physical safety is involved. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

But given that the government is actively leaking PII, no social media policy is going to be perfect. At most, it’s a harm reduction strategy; possibly it’s futile. But at least it draws attention to the underlying issue which needs to be fixed. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

The government should protect PII (nobody thinks that’s a violation of free speech) and certainly should not be the active leaker of it. — PolitiTweet.org